Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 491

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Elitists, risk-takers, and rugged individualists? An exploratory analysis of cultural differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs

McGrath, Rita Gunther, MacMillan, Ian C., Scheinberg, Sari·1992·Journal of Business Venturing

Abstract

This study examines whether or not certain values are likely to be held consistently by entrepreneurs, which are not held by non-entrepreneurs. The four underlying dimensions of culture from Hofstede's 1980 study--power distance, individualism, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity--are used to derive a set of hypotheses suggesting that each dimension exists for entrepreneurs regardless of their cultural orientation. Responses from 1,217 entrepreneurs and 1, 206 non-entrepreneurs, in nine countries, were used to examine these hypotheses. Findings supported all five initial hypotheses, indicating that: entrepreneurs share a predictable set of values, when compared with non-entrepreneurs; entrepreneurs do not appear to mind social inequality, but expect to be at the top of any social hierarchy due to their own merit; entrepreneurs favor independent action and separation from groups; entrepreneurs can tolerate risk and ambiguity; and entrepreneurs are more highly motivated to obtain economic and recognition rewards than are non-entrepreneurs. (SFL)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0883-9026(92)90008-f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C., & Scheinberg, S.
Venue
Journal of Business Venturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-03
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
115-135
ISSN
0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072948949
Cited by
491
References
0
FWCI
13.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.