CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A framework for governance of projects: Governmentality, governance structure and projectification

Müller, Ralf, Zhai, Li, Wang, Anyu, Shao, Jingting·2016·International Journal of Project Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The EFA results provided a psychometric foundation for the hypothesis testing completed in this study.

    “Future researchers will find confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to be a logical next step; however, the EFA results provided a psychometric foundation for the hypothesis testing completed in this study, which is consistent with other exploratory studies conducted in project management research (Müller et al., 2016;Saani, 2021).”

    From Exploring the Moderating Effect of Ethical Project Management Practices in the Success of IT Project: Evidence From the Public Sector (2026) · cites this paper as Müller et al., 2016

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Alvesson, 2000, Varieties of discourse: on the study of organizations through discourse analysis, Hum. Relat., 53, 1125, 10.1177/0018726700539002 · DOI
  2. Alvesson, 2007, Constructing mystery: empirical matters in theory development, Acad. Manag. Rev., 32, 1265, 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586822 · DOI
  3. Amihud, 1981, Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers, Bell J. Econ., 12, 602, 10.2307/3003575 · DOI
  4. Ayoob, 2002, Humanitarian intervention and state sovereignty, Int. J. Hum. Rights, 6, 81, 10.1080/714003751 · DOI
  5. Badewi, 2016, The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: towards developing a project benefits governance framework, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 34, 761, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.05.005 · DOI
  6. Begley, 1987, Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses, J. Bus. Ventur., 2, 79, 10.1016/0883-9026(87)90020-6 · DOI
  7. Biesenthal, 2014, Multi-level project governance: trends and opportunities, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 32, 1291, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.005 · DOI
  8. Busenitz, 1997, Biases and heuristics in strategic decision making: differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations, J. Bus. Ventur., 12, 9, 10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-1 · DOI
  9. Clases, 2003, Studying Trust in Virtual Organizations, Int. Stud. Manag. Organ., 33, 7
  10. Clegg, 1994, Weber and Foucault: social theory for the study of organizations, Organization, 1, 149, 10.1177/135050849400100115 · DOI
  11. Clegg, 2002, Governmentality matters: designing an alliance culture of inter-organizational collaboration for managing projects, Organ. Stud., 23, 317, 10.1177/0170840602233001 · DOI
  12. Davis, 1997, Towards a stewardship theory of management, Acad. Manag. Rev., 22, 20, 10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258 · DOI
  13. Dixit, 2009, Governance institutions and economic activity, Am. Econ. Rev., 99, 5, 10.1257/aer.99.1.5 · DOI
  14. Easton, 2010, Critical realism in case study research, Ind. Mark. Manag., 39, 118, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.06.004 · DOI
  15. Elonen, 2003, Problems in managing internal development projects in multi-project environments, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 21, 395, 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00097-2 · DOI
  16. European Union, 2003, Commission recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, Off. J. Eur. Union
  17. Franck, 2003, Reconciling rent-seekers and donators—the governance structure of open source, J. Manag. Gov., 7, 401, 10.1023/A:1026261005092 · DOI
  18. Gemünden, 2005, The influence of project autonomy on project success, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 23, 366, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.03.004 · DOI
  19. Hernandez, 2012, Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship, Acad. Manag. Rev., 37, 172, 10.5465/amr.2010.0363 · DOI
  20. Hoetker, 2009, Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type, Strateg. Manag. J., 30, 1025, 10.1002/smj.775 · DOI
  21. Jacobsson, 2011, Breaking out of the straightjacket of project research: in search of contribution, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 4, 378, 10.1108/17538371111144139 · DOI
  22. Jensen, 1976, Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, J. Financ. Econ., 3, 305, 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X · DOI · Paper page
  23. Jensen, 1994, The nature of man, J. Appl. Corp. Finance, 7, 4, 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1994.tb00401.x · DOI
  24. Klakegg, 2011, Governance of major public investment projects: in pursuit of relevance and sustainability, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 4, 157, 10.1108/17538371111096953 · DOI
  25. Klakegg, 2008, Governance frameworks for public project development and estimation, Proj. Manag. J., 39, 27, 10.1002/pmj.20058 · DOI
  26. Krasner, 2001, Rethinking the sovereign state model, Rev. Int. Stud., 27, 17, 10.1017/S0260210501008014 · DOI
  27. Lemke, 2001, The birth of bio-politics: Michel Foucault's lecture at Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality, Econ. Soc., 30, 190, 10.1080/03085140120042271 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lemke, 2007, An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory, Distinktion Scand. J. Soc. Theory, 8, 43, 10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946 · DOI
  29. McGrath, 1992, Elitists, risk-takers, and rugged individualists? An exploratory analysis of cultural differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs, J. Bus. Ventur., 7, 115, 10.1016/0883-9026(92)90008-F · DOI
  30. Midler, 1995, “Projectification” of the firm: the Renault case, Scand. J. Manag., 11, 363, 10.1016/0956-5221(95)00035-T · DOI
  31. Miller, 2005, Governance regimes for large projects, Proj. Manag. J., 36, 42, 10.1177/875697280503600305 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Müller, 2014, Operationalizing governance categories of projects, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 32, 1346, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.005 · DOI
  33. Müller, 2005, The impact of principal–agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 23, 398, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.03.001 · DOI
  34. Müller, 2008, Project portfolio control and portfolio management in different contexts, Proj. Manag. J., 39, 28, 10.1002/pmj.20053 · DOI
  35. Müller, 2013, The interrelationship of governance, trust, and ethics in temporary organizations, Proj. Manag. J., 44, 26, 10.1002/pmj.21350 · DOI
  36. Müller, 2014, Organizational enablers for governance and governmentality of projects: a literature review, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 32, 1309, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.007 · DOI
  37. Müller, 2014, Ethics, trust and governance in temporary organizations, Proj. Manag. J., 45, 39, 10.1002/pmj.21432 · DOI
  38. Müller, 2015, Organizational enablers for project governance and governmentality in project-based organizations, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 33, 839, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.008 · DOI
  39. Ouchi, 1980, Markets, bureaucracies and clans, Adm. Sci. Q., 25, 129, 10.2307/2392231 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Pinto, 2009, Trust in projects: an empirical assessment of owner/contractor relationships, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 27, 638, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.09.010 · DOI
  41. Pitsis, 2014, Governing projects under complexity: theory and practice in project management, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 32, 1285, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.09.001 · DOI
  42. Poppo, 2002, Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?, Strateg. Manag. J., 23, 707, 10.1002/smj.249 · DOI
  43. Pryke, 2005, Towards a social network theory of project governance, Constr. Manag. Econ., 23, 927, 10.1080/01446190500184196 · DOI
  44. Saunders, 2007
  45. Teddlie, 2007, Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples, J. Mixed Methods Res., 1, 77, 10.1177/2345678906292430 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Too, 2014, The management of project management: a conceptual framework for project governance, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 32, 1382, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.006 · DOI
  47. Turner, 2003, On the nature of the project as a temporary organization, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 21, 1, 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00020-0 · DOI
  48. Winch, 2001, Governing the project process: a conceptual framework, Constr. Manag. Econ., 19, 799, 10.1080/01446190110074264 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Müller, R., Zhai, L., Wang, A., & Shao, J.
Venue
International Journal of Project Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
957-969
ISSN
0263-7863
DOI
10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.002
Cited by
84
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review