The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nonlinear multivariate analysis
Abstract
Since the industrial revolution and the production model that has since been used, there has been an intensification in the scarcity of natural resources in terms of qualitative and quantitative parameters. Therefore, studies aiming to understand human actions on these resources are essential for the maintenance and conservation of these assets for current and future generations. The objective here is to identify and analyze land use and land cover changes in the hydrographic basin of Verdinho River (Brazilian Cerrado) and its geographical context between 1986 and 2016 using geotechnological resources. We analyzed a significant replacement of pasture for agricultural areas, decreases in Cerrado vegetation, expansion of industrial areas, rural construction and water availability, and significant increases in areas with laminar erosion. The increase in exposed soil areas from 7.81 ha in 1986 to 262.35 ha in 2016 (3259.15%) was due to a history of inadequate soil use and management. Anthropic actions have suppressed the natural vegetation and given rise to agricultural activities, which often provide the agroecosystem with favorable conditions for intensifying erosion processes. This study subsidizes the implementation of effective and efficient actions in this hydrographic basin considering the economic and social development aligned with environmental conservation and serves as a basis for other studies conducted at the site and in other regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 · Cited by 16,064
Ter Braak, C. J. F., & Prentice, I. C. (1988) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60183-x · Cited by 1,963
A bootstrap resampling procedure for model building: Application to the cox regression model
Sauerbrei, W., & Schumacher, M. (1992) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780111607 · Cited by 600
The effects of child abuse and neglect on cognitive functioning in adulthood
Gould, F., Clarke, J., Heim, C., Harvey, P. D., Majer, M., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2012) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.01.005 · Cited by 367
Nonlinear Principal Components Analysis With CATPCA: A Tutorial
Linting, M., & van der Kooij, A. (2012) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.627965 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- De Leeuw, J.
- Venue
- Evaluation Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-157
- ISSN
- 0886-1633 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148150708
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear multivariate analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0886-1633(90)90050-n
- The paper
- De Leeuw, J. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. Evaluation Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(90)90050-n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.