The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A calculus of mobile processes, I
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages
Medvidovic, N., & Taylor, R. N. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.825767 · Cited by 1,987
Ownership types for flexible alias protection
Clarke, D. G., Potter, J. M., & Noble, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications · doi:10.1145/286936.286947 · Cited by 580
Genetic process mining: an experimental evaluation
de Medeiros, A. K. A., Weijters, A. J. M. M., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-006-0061-7 · Cited by 490
Subtyping for session types in the pi calculus
Gay, S., & Hole, M. (2005) · Acta Informatica · doi:10.1007/s00236-005-0177-z · Cited by 373
Modeling formalisms in Systems Biology
Machado, D., Costa, R. S., Rocha, M., Ferreira, E. C., Tidor, B., & Rocha, I. (2011) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/2191-0855-1-45 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Milner, R., Parrow, J., & Walker, D.
- Venue
- Information and Computation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-40
- ISSN
- 0890-5401 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128932399
- Cited by
- 2,845
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A calculus of mobile processes, I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0890-5401(92)90008-4
- The paper
- Milner, R., Parrow, J., & Walker, D. (1992). A calculus of mobile processes, I. Information and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-5401(92)90008-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
