Cited by 1,987Model-Driven Software Engineering TechniquesAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages

Open access
Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.·2000·IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Abstract

Software architectures shift the focus of developers from lines-of-code to coarser-grained architectural elements and their overall interconnection structure. Architecture description languages (ADLs) have been proposed as modeling notations to support architecture-based development. There is, however, little consensus in the research community on what is an ADL, what aspects of an architecture should be modeled in an ADL, and which of several possible ADLs is best suited for a particular problem. Furthermore, the distinction is rarely made between ADLs on one hand and formal specification, module interconnection, simulation and programming languages on the other. This paper attempts to provide an answer to these questions. It motivates and presents a definition and a classification framework for ADLs. The utility of the definition is demonstrated by using it to differentiate ADLs from other modeling notations. The framework is used to classify and compare several existing ADLs, enabling us, in the process, to identify key properties of ADLs. The comparison highlights areas where existing ADLs provide extensive support and those in which they are deficient, suggesting a research agenda for the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/32.825767

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. R. Allen. HLA: A Standards Effort as Architectural Style. In A. L. Wolf, ed.. Proceedings of theSecond International Software Architecture Workshop (ISAW-2), pages 130-133, San Francisco, CA, October 1996.
  2. B. W. Boehm and W. L. Scherlis. Megaprogramming. In Proceedings ofthe Software Technology Conference 1992, pages 63-82, Los Angeles, April 1992. DARPA.
  3. M. R. Cagan. The HP SoftBench Environment: An Architecture for a New Generation of Software Tools. Hewlett-Packard Journal, pages 36-47, June 1990.
  4. P. C. Clements. ASurvey ofArchitecture Description Languages. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Software Specification andDesign, Paderbom, Germany, March 1996.
  5. D. Garlan, editor. Proceedings ofthe FirstInternational Workshop on Architectures for Software Systems, Seattle, WA, April 1995.
  6. J. V. Guttag and J.J.Homing. Larch: Languages and Toolsfor Formal Specification. Springer-Verlag, 1993.
  7. D. Garlan and M. Shaw. An Introduction to Software Architecture: Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, volume I. World Scientific Publishing, 1993.
  8. W. L. Hursch, L. M. Seiter, and C. Xiao. In any CASE: Demeter. American Programmer, pages 46-56, October 1991.
  9. P. Kogut and P. Clements. Feature Analysis of Architecture Description Languages. In Proceedings of the Software Technology Conference (STC'95), Salt Lake City, April 1995.
  10. J. Magee and J. Kramer. Modelling Distributed Software Architectures. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Architectures for Software Systems, pages 206-222, Seattle, WA. April 1995.
  11. N. Medvidovic and R. N. Taylor. Reusing Off-the-Shelf Components to Develop a Family ofApplications in the C2 Architectural Style. To appear in Proceedings ofthe International Workshop on Development and Evolution ofSojiware Architecturesfor Product Families, Las Navas del Marques. Avila, Spain, November 1996.
  12. N. Medvidovic, R. N. Taylor, and E. J. Whitehead, Jr. Formal Modeling ofSoftware Architectures at Multiple Levels of Abstraction. In Proceedings of the California Software Symposium 1996, pages 28-40, Los Angeles, CA. April 1996.
  13. J. E. Robbins and D. Redmiles. Software architecture design from the perspective of human cognitive needs. In Proceedings of the California Software Symposium (CSS'96}, Los Angeles, CA, USA, April 1996.
  14. J. M. Spivey. The Znotation: a reference manual. Prentice Hall, New York, 1989.
  15. R. N. Taylor, N. Medvidovic, K. M. Anderson, E.J.Whitehead, Jr., J. E. Robbins, K. A. Nies, P. Oreizy, and D. L. Dubrow. A Component-and Message-Based Architectural Style for GUI Software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineerins pages 390-406, June 1996.
  16. W. Tracz. Parameterized Programming in LILEANNA. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium onApplied Computing (SAC'93), February 1993.
  17. W. Tracz. LILEANNA: AParameterized Programming Language. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software Reuse, pages 66-78, Lucca Italv March 1993.
  18. IEEE, Inc. IEEE Standard VHDL Language Reference Manual. IEEE Standard 1076- 1987. Los Alamitos, CA, IEEE CS Press, 1987.
  19. A. L. Wolf, editor. Proceedings ofthe Second International Software Architecture Workshop (ISAW-2), San Francisco, CA, October 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medvidovic, N., & Taylor, R. N.
Affiliations
  • Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Published
2000-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
70-93
ISSN
  • 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3520
  • 2326-3881
OpenAlex
W2162366870
Cited by
1,987
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 88
FWCI
329.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
architecture description languages, software architecture, modeling notation, formal specification, module interconnection, simulation languages, programming languages, architectural modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review