Cited by 198Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Differential reinforcement as treatment for behavior disorders: Procedural and functional variations

Vollmer, Timothy R., Iwata, Brian A.·1992·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

For many years, differential reinforcement has been a prevalent and preferred treatment procedure for the reduction of behavior disorders. This paper reviews the procedural variations of differential reinforcement and discusses their functional properties. It is proposed that such procedures are more likely to be successful if behavioral function is a primary consideration in prescribing treatments; furthermore, limited success noted in previous research may be due to the arbitrary relationship that often exists between reinforcers and target behaviors when behavioral function is unknown. Despite the promise of a function-based approach to differential reinforcement, several current limitations exist in the identification and manipulation of relevant variables. Thus, further research is required to elucidate the relationship between aberrant behaviors and the variables responsible for maintaining them; otherwise, successful treatment cannot be expected. Several areas for future research are discussed conceptually as extensions of current and past experimentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0891-4222(92)90013-v

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The paper characterizes procedures that reinforce alternative responses to thoughts as a differential reinforcement of alternative responses (DRA) process.

    “Either way, this could be characterized as a Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Responses (DRA) procedure, in which the usual response is extinguished in favor of new, alternative ones that are reinforced (cf.Vollmer & Iwata, 1992).”

    From A Process-Based Analysis of Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as Vollmer & Iwata, 1992

  • This process can be characterized as a Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Responses (DRA) procedure, in which the usual response is extinguished in favor of reinforced alternatives.

    “Either way, this could be characterized as a Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Responses (DRA) procedure, in which the usual response is extinguished in favor of new, alternative ones that are reinforced (cf.Vollmer & Iwata, 1992).”

    From A Process-Based Analysis of Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as Vollmer & Iwata, 1992

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 198

Authors
Vollmer, T. R., & Iwata, B. A.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vollmer, Timothy R.
  • Iwata, Brian A.
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-07
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
393-417
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984252587
Cited by
198
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
differential reinforcement, behavior disorders, functional analysis, behavioral functioning, therapeutic procedures, behavior maintenance, developmental disabilities
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Motivation, Reinforcement Schedule

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review