Cited by 54Treatment of Major DepressionSleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Longitudinal Effects of Nortriptyline on EEG Sleep and the Likelihood of Recurrence in Elderly Depressed Patients

Buysse, D·1996·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Our objectives were to determine the effects of nortriptyline and placebo on subjective and EEG sleep measures over 1 year of maintenance therapy in elderly depressed patients and to determine the relationship of such effects to recurrence in nortriptyline or placebo-treated patients during maintenance therapy. EEG and subjective sleep assessments were conducted before and during a maintenance therapy study of patients suffering from major depression. During acute treatment all patients received nortriptyline plus interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT). During maintenance treatment patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment in one of four cells: nortriptyline with IPT; nortriptyline with medication clinic (no IPT); placebo with IPT; or placebo with medication clinic. Sleep evaluations were conducted at one point before treatment, one point following remission during continuation nortriptyline/IPT treatment, and at three time points after random assignment to maintenance treatment. The setting was the sleep laboratory of the outpatient depression treatment clinic, and subjects were a convenience sample of media-recruited and clinically referred elderly outpatient depressed patients (n = 72). Complete sleep analyses were conducted for 21 nortriptyline- and 10 placebo-treated patients throughout 1 year of maintenance treatment. The main outcome measures were subjective and EEG sleep measures and the recurrence of major depression. Our results show that nortriptyline ac…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0893-133x(95)00114-s

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower phasic REM activity in the first year of maintenance therapy with nortriptyline is associated with recurrence of depression.

    “In fact, lower phasic REM activity in the first year of maintenance therapy with nortriptyline is associated with recurrence of depression [Buysse et al., 1996].”

    From Depression, sleep physiology, and antidepressant drugs (2001) · cites this paper as Buysse et al., 1996

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buysse, D.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Buysse, D
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
1996-04
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
243-252
ISSN
0893-133X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069413986
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH052247, MH-43832, MH30915)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
nortriptyline, geriatric depression, major depressive disorder, depression recurrence, maintenance therapy, REM sleep, sleep apnea, periodic limb movements, subjective sleep quality, interpersonal psychotherapy, tricyclic antidepressants, sleep EEG
MeSH terms
Aged, Depressive Disorder, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Nortriptyline, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review