The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing predictive accuracy: How to compare brier scores
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982) · Judgment under Uncertainty · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.023 · Cited by 1,967
Cited by
Bendapudi, P. K., Hurwitz, S., Fry, A., Marques, M. B., Waldo, S. W., Li, A., Sun, L., Upadhyay, V., Hamdan, A., Brunner, A. M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Haematology · doi:10.1016/s2352-3026(17)30026-1 · Cited by 561
Use of Brier score to assess binary predictions
Rufibach, K. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.009 · Cited by 454
The role of non-financial factors in internal credit ratings
Grunert, J., Norden, L., & Weber, M. (2005) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.05.017 · Cited by 438
The Performance of Risk Prediction Models
Gerds, T. A., Cai, T., & Schumacher, M. (2008) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.200810443 · Cited by 288
Head‐to‐head comparison of leading blood tests for Alzheimer's disease pathology
(2024) · doi:10.1002/alz.14315 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Redelmeier, D. A., Bloch, D. A., & Hickam, D. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1141-1146
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051201630
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing predictive accuracy: How to compare brier scores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90146-z
- The paper
- Redelmeier, D. A., Bloch, D. A., & Hickam, D. H. (1991). Assessing predictive accuracy: How to compare brier scores. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90146-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
