Induction and expression of long- and short-term neurosecretory potentiation in a neural cell line
Abstract
In a neural cell line, the secretion of excitatory amino acids in response to a depolarizing stimulus is potentiated by the addition of serotonin. The duration of this potentiation is dependent on the strength of the stimulus. Persistent secretory potentiation induced by a strong stimulus requires the activation of both serotonin and NMDA receptors. Inhibiting the NMDA receptor during serotonin presentation prevented the induction of potentiation. The temporal characteristic of the potentiation is correlated with the elevation of cAMP levels. Serotonin exposure while inhibiting NMDA receptors results in a transient elevation of cAMP levels, whereas coactivation with NMDA and serotonin results in a persistent elevation of cAMP. Thus, it is possible to obtain potentiation of secretion in a single cell either transiently or persistently. The timing of potentiated responses in this system is of the same magnitude as that in similar systems used as models for short-term and long-term memory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HT22 cells are immortalized primary mouse hippocampal neuronal cells, derived from parent HT4 cells.
“HT22 cells are immortalized primary mouse hippocampal neuronal cells, derived from parent HT4 cells [22,24].”
From Shared and distinct microRNA profiles between HT22, N2A and SH-SY5Y cell lines and primary mouse hippocampal neurons (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Intracellular injections of EGTA block induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation
Lynch, G., Larson, J., Kelso, S., Barrionuevo, G., & Schottler, F. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/305719a0 · Cited by 1,116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Flavonoids Protect Neuronal Cells from Oxidative Stress by Three Distinct Mechanisms
Ishige, K., Schubert, D., & Sagara, Y. (2001) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(00)00498-6 · Cited by 841 · see citing works
Stanciu, M., Wang, Y., Kentor, R., Burke, N., Watkins, S., Kress, G., Reynolds, I., Klann, E., Angiolieri, M. R., Johnson, J. W., et al. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.275.16.12200 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Murphy, R., Villegas-Salmerón, J., Sanz-Rodriguez, A., Engel, T., Mooney, C., Henshall, D. C., & Jimenez-Mateos, E. M. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0326401 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morimoto, B. H., & Koshland, D. E.
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 875-880
- ISSN
- 0896-6273
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review