The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0417 · Cited by 4,215
The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary∗
Naess, A. (1973) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/00201747308601682 · Cited by 2,409
A Course in Microeconomic Theory
Kreps, D. M. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691202754.001.0001 · Cited by 1,592
The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary
(2007) · The Selected Works of Arne Naess · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_85 · Cited by 1,242
Consumer's Surplus Without Apology
Willig, R. D. (2016) · American Economic Review · Cited by 1,127
Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality
Bergstrom, J. C. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 701
(2013) · Electricity Markets and Power System Economics · doi:10.1201/b15550-8 · Cited by 400
A Course in Microeconomic Theory.
Bray, M., & Kreps, D. M. (1991) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233572 · Cited by 393
Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: What Do CVM Estimates Really Show?
Stevens, T. H., Echeverria, J., Glass, R. J., Hager, T., & More, T. A. (1991) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146546 · Cited by 376
Environmentalists, vanguard for a new society
Milbrath, L. W., & Fisher, B. V. (1984) · Cited by 322
Cited by
Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R. S., & van Ierland, E. C. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005 · Cited by 1,291
Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics
Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O'Neill, J. (1998) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(97)00120-1 · Cited by 783
Valuing the diversity of biodiversity
Christie, M., Hanley, N., Warren, J., Murphy, K., Wright, R., & Hyde, T. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.034 · Cited by 386
Self-citationThe Brave New World of Carbon Trading
Spash, C. L. (2010) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563460903556049 · Cited by 327
Self-citationMultiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development
Munda, G. (2006) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/0-387-23081-5_23 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Spash, C. L., & Hanley, N.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-208
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2271606566
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 47.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0921-8009(94)00056-2
- The paper
- Spash, C. L., & Hanley, N. (1995). Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)00056-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
