Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another distinctive categorisation of aggregation methods is choosing between compensatory and non-compensatory approaches.
“Another distinctive categorisation of the aggregation methods in the literature would be that of choosing between 'compensatory' and 'non-compensatory' approaches (Munda 2005b).”
From On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness (2019) · cites this paper as Munda 2005b
Cites
Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding
Roy, B. (1996) · Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1 · Cited by 1,350 · see citing works
“Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework
Munda, G. (2005) · Environment, Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9 · Cited by 1,325 · see citing works
“19 Another distinctive categorisation of the aggregation methods in the literature would be that of choosing between ‘compensatory’ and ‘non-compensatory’ approaches (Munda 2005b).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVollmer, D., Pribadi, D. O., Remondi, F., Rustiadi, E., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2016) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2015.10.004 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Munda, G.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Munda, Giuseppe
- ORCID
- Munda, Giuseppe
- Venue
- International Series in Operations Research & Management Science
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag
- Published
- 2006-01-17
- Pages
- 953-986
- OpenAlex
- W1762303435
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 29.65
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
- Keywords
- multi-criteria decision making, sustainable development, sustainability conflicts, sustainability policy, sustainability assessment, good practice guidelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
