Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Correction for head size in brain-imaging measurements

Open access
Mathalon, Daniel H., Sullivan, Edith V., Rawles, Jody M., Pfefferbaum, Adolf·1993·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

Structural brain-imaging measurements based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are often corrected or adjusted for normal variation in head size. Some methods of head-size correction, such as the ventricle-brain ratio (VBR), are based on taking the brain structure size as a proportion of the estimated head size, while other methods have used a regression model to obtain head-size residualized structure measures. Recently, head-size correction was shown to result in less reliable volumetric measures of brain structures (Arndt et al., 1991). In the present study, MRI was used to examine the effects of head-size correction on the interrater reliability of volumetric measures of gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid. Four raters independently scored MRI brain images from 26 subjects, generating separate estimates of head size and region of interest (ROI) size. Two methods were used to correct MRI values for differences in head size, one based on proportions and the other based on linear regression. Results confirmed that head-size correction did produce measures with lower reliability; however, further analysis based on classical measurement theory showed that the lower reliability was attributable not only to increased measurement error variance, but also to reduced true score variance. Subsequent analyses of criterion validity compared the raw (uncorrected) and head-size-corrected ROI measures in terms of their correlations with age in a sample of 43 normal control subjects, and in terms of their ability to differentiate schizophrenic patients (n = 22) from normal control subjects (n = 20). Results indicated that head-size correction often improved criterion validity, producing higher correlations with age and with diagnostic status than those produced by the raw measures. These findings suggest that head-size correction removes irrelevant true-score variance which reduces reliability yet improves the correlations with validity criteria such as age and diagnostic status.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0925-4927(93)90016-b

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Mathalon, D. H., Sullivan, E. V., Rawles, J. M., & Pfefferbaum, A.
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-06
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
121-139
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979985012
Cited by
261
References
0
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correction for head size in brain-imaging measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0925-4927(93)90016-b
The paper
Mathalon, D. H., Sullivan, E. V., Rawles, J. M., & Pfefferbaum, A. (1993). Correction for head size in brain-imaging measurements. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4927(93)90016-b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.