The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correction for head size in brain-imaging measurements
Open accessAbstract
Structural brain-imaging measurements based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are often corrected or adjusted for normal variation in head size. Some methods of head-size correction, such as the ventricle-brain ratio (VBR), are based on taking the brain structure size as a proportion of the estimated head size, while other methods have used a regression model to obtain head-size residualized structure measures. Recently, head-size correction was shown to result in less reliable volumetric measures of brain structures (Arndt et al., 1991). In the present study, MRI was used to examine the effects of head-size correction on the interrater reliability of volumetric measures of gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid. Four raters independently scored MRI brain images from 26 subjects, generating separate estimates of head size and region of interest (ROI) size. Two methods were used to correct MRI values for differences in head size, one based on proportions and the other based on linear regression. Results confirmed that head-size correction did produce measures with lower reliability; however, further analysis based on classical measurement theory showed that the lower reliability was attributable not only to increased measurement error variance, but also to reduced true score variance. Subsequent analyses of criterion validity compared the raw (uncorrected) and head-size-corrected ROI measures in terms of their correlations with age in a sample of 43 normal control subjects, and in terms of their ability to differentiate schizophrenic patients (n = 22) from normal control subjects (n = 20). Results indicated that head-size correction often improved criterion validity, producing higher correlations with age and with diagnostic status than those produced by the raw measures. These findings suggest that head-size correction removes irrelevant true-score variance which reduces reliability yet improves the correlations with validity criteria such as age and diagnostic status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia
Shenton, M. E., Dickey, C. C., Frumin, M., & McCarley, R. W. (2001) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(01)00163-3 · Cited by 2,346
Pfefferbaum, A., Mathalon, D. H., Sullivan, E. V., Rawles, J. M., Zipursky, R. B., & Lim, K. O. (1994) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1994.00540210046012 · Cited by 1,363
Self-citationCASEY, B. J., CASTELLANOS, F. X., GIEDD, J. N., MARSH, W. L., HAMBURGER, S. D., SCHUBERT, A. B., VAUSS, Y. C., VAITUZIS, A. C., DICKSTEIN, D. P., SARFATTI, S. E., et al. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199703000-00016 · Cited by 800
Episodic memory loss is related to hippocampal-mediated -amyloid deposition in elderly subjects
Mormino, E. C., Kluth, J. T., Madison, C. M., Rabinovici, G. D., Baker, S. L., Miller, B. L., Koeppe, R. A., Mathis, C. A., Weiner, M. W., Jagust, W. J., et al. (2009) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awn320 · Cited by 684
Cortical Abnormalities in Schizophrenia Identified by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Goldstein, J. M. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.6.537 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathalon, D. H., Sullivan, E. V., Rawles, J. M., & Pfefferbaum, A.
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-139
- ISSN
- 0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979985012
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correction for head size in brain-imaging measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0925-4927(93)90016-b
- The paper
- Mathalon, D. H., Sullivan, E. V., Rawles, J. M., & Pfefferbaum, A. (1993). Correction for head size in brain-imaging measurements. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4927(93)90016-b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.