Cited by 706Speech and dialogue systemsUsability and User Interface DesignAI in Service Interactions

Wizard of Oz studies — why and how

Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L.·1993·Knowledge-Based Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0950-7051(93)90017-n

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., & Ahrenberg, L.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Venue
Knowledge-Based Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
258-266
ISSN
0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999184850
Cited by
706
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
Wizard-of-Oz study, natural language dialogue systems, human-machine interaction, human-computer interaction, natural language interfaces, intelligent user interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review