Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,011

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models

Homma, Toshimitsu, Saltelli, Andrea·1996·Reliability Engineering & System Safety

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0951-8320(96)00002-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Helton, 1989, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a dry containment test problem for the MAEROS aerosol model, Nucl. Sci. & Engng, 102, 22, 10.13182/NSE89-A23629 · DOI
  2. Helton, 1992, An exploratory sensitivity study with the MACCS reactor accident consequence model, Reliab. Engng System Safety, 36, 137, 10.1016/0951-8320(92)90095-3 · DOI
  3. Helton, 1993, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in a preliminary performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant, Nucl. Sci. & Engng, 114, 286, 10.13182/NSE93-A24041 · DOI
  4. Rabitz, 1989, System analysis at molecular scale, Sci., 246, 221, 10.1126/science.246.4927.221 · DOI
  5. Helton, 1993, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal, Reliab. Engng System Safety, 42, 327, 10.1016/0951-8320(93)90097-I · DOI · Paper page
  6. Welch, 1992, Screening, predicting, and computer experiments, Technometrics, 34, 15, 10.2307/1269548 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Saltelli, 1995, Sensitivity analysis of model output; performance of the iterated fractional factorial design (IFFD) method, Computational Stat. & Data Anal., 20, 387, 10.1016/0167-9473(95)92843-M · DOI
  8. Cawlfield, 1993, Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for one-dimensional reactive transport in porous media, Water Resources Res., 29, 661, 10.1029/92WR01948 · DOI
  9. Koda, 1992, Sensitivity analysis of stochastic dynamical systems, Int. J. System Sci., 23, 2187, 10.1080/00207729208949448 · doi:10.1080/00207729208949448
  10. Iman, 1988, An investigation of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, Risk Anal., 8, 71, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01155.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Saltelli, 1992, Sensitivity analysis for model output; performance of black box techniques on three international benchmark exercises, Computational Stat. & Data Anal., 13, 73, 10.1016/0167-9473(92)90155-9 · DOI
  12. Saltelli, 1993, Sensitivity analysis of model output; an investigation of new techniques, Computational Stat. & Data Anal., 15, 211, 10.1016/0167-9473(93)90193-W · DOI
  13. Iman, 1990, A robust measure of uncertainty importance for use in fault tree system analysis, Risk Anal., 10, 401, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00523.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Homma, 1995, Use of Sobol's quasirandom sequence generator for integration of modified uncertainty importance measure, J. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 32, 1164, 10.3327/jnst.32.1164 · doi:10.3327/jnst.32.1164
  15. Sobol', 1993, Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models, Math. Modeling & Computational Experiment, 1, 407
  16. Cukier, 1973, Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients I: Theory, J. Chemical Physics, 59, 3873, 10.1063/1.1680571 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Schaibly, 1973, Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients II: Applications, J. Chemical Physics, 59, 3879, 10.1063/1.1680572 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Cukier, 1978, Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems, J. Computational Physics, 26, 1, 10.1016/0021-9991(78)90097-9 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Sacks, 1989, Design and analysis of computer experiments, Stat. Sci., 4, 409, 10.1214/ss/1177012413 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Liepman, 1985, Development and global sensitivity analysis of a closed ecosystem model, Ecological Modelling, 30, 13, 10.1016/0304-3800(85)90035-3 · DOI
  21. Sobol', 1976, Uniformly distributed sequences with an additional uniform property, USSR Computational Math. & Math. Physics, 16, 236, 10.1016/0041-5553(76)90154-3 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Sobol', 1990, Quasi-Monte-Carlo methods, Progress in Nucl. Energy, 24, 55, 10.1016/0149-1970(90)90022-W · doi:10.1016/0149-1970(90)90022-w
  23. Morris, 1991, Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments, Technometrics, 33, 161, 10.2307/1269043 · DOI
  24. McKay, 1979, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 21, 239, 10.2307/1268522 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Bratley, 1988, Algorithm 659, implementing Sobol's quasirandom sequence generator, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 14, 88, 10.1145/42288.214372 · DOI
  26. Cotter, 1979, A screening design for factorial experiments with interactions, Biometrika, 66, 317, 10.1093/biomet/66.2.317 · DOI
  27. Saltelli, 1995, Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of dimethylsulphide (DMS) oxidation kinetics, J. Atmospheric Chem., 21, 187, 10.1007/BF00696755 · DOI
  28. Robinson, 1987, Exact solutions for radionuclide transport in the presence of parameter uncertainty, Radioactive waste management and the nuclear fuel cycle, 8, 283

Cited by

See all 2,011

Metadata

Authors
Homma, T., & Saltelli, A.
Venue
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-04
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026645785
Cited by
2,011
References
1
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0951-8320(96)00002-6
The paper
Homma, T., & Saltelli, A. (1996). Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(96)00002-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.