The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anesthesia crisis resource management: Real-life simulation training in operating room crises
Open accessAbstract
Little formal training is provided in anesthesiology residency programs to help acquire, develop, and practice skills in resource management and decision making during crises in practice. Using anesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM) principles developed at another institution, 68 anesthesiologists and 4 nurse-anesthetists participated in an ACRM training course held over a 2 and a half-month period. The anesthesia environment was recreated in a real operating room, with standard equipment and simulations requiring actual performance of clinical interventions. Scenarios included overdose of inhalation anesthetic, oxygen source failure, cardiac arrest, malignant hyperthermia, tension pneumothorax, and complete power failure. A detailed questionnaire was administered following the debriefing and completed by all participants, documenting their immediate impressions. Participants rated themselves as having performed well in the simulator. Senior attendings and residents rated themselves more highly than did their junior counterparts. The potential benefit of this course for anesthesiologists to practice anesthesia more safely in a controlled exercise environment, was rated highly by both groups. Over one half of respondents in all categories felt that the course should be taken once every 12 months; another third of each group felt that the course should be taken once every 24 months. While no senior attendings believed that the course should be taken once every 6 months, approximately 10% of respondents in other categories that it should. Of respondents in the senior and junior attending category, 5% felt the course should never be taken. Although attendings were less favorable than residents in their rating of the value of the course, both groups were still enthusiastic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluating Clinical Simulations for Learning Procedural Skills: A Theory-Based Approach
Kneebone, R. (2005) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200506000-00006 · Cited by 423
Beyond crisis resource management: new frontiers in human factors training for acute care medicine
Petrosoniak, A., & Hicks, C. M. (2013) · Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aco.0000000000000007 · Cited by 74
Crises in clinical care: an approach to management
Runciman, W. B. (2005) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.012856 · Cited by 54
(2002) · Human factors and aerospace safety
Metadata
- Authors
- Holzman, R. S., Cooper, J. B., Gaba, D. M., Philip, J. H., Small, S. D., & Feinstem, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 675-687
- ISSN
- 0952-8180 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988967120
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anesthesia crisis resource management: Real-life simulation training in operating room crises. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0952-8180(95)00146-8
- The paper
- Holzman, R. S., Cooper, J. B., Gaba, D. M., Philip, J. H., Small, S. D., & Feinstem, D. (1995). Anesthesia crisis resource management: Real-life simulation training in operating room crises. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/0952-8180(95)00146-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.