Cited by 54Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

Crises in clinical care: an approach to management

Open access
Runciman, W B·2005·Quality and Safety in Health Care

Abstract

A "crisis" in health care is "the point in the course of a disease at which a decisive change occurs, leading either to recovery or to death". The daunting challenges faced by clinicians when confronted with a crisis are illustrated by a tragic case in which a teenage boy died after a minor surgical procedure. Crises are challenging for reasons which include: presentation with non-specific signs or symptoms, interaction of complex factors, progressive evolution, new situations, "revenge effects", inadequate assistance, and time constraints. In crises, clinicians often experience anxiety- and overload-induced performance degradation, tend to use "frequency gambling", run out of "rules" and have to work from first principles, and are prone to "confirmation bias". The effective management of crises requires formal training, usually simulator-based, and ideally in the inter-professional groups who will need to function as a team. "COVER ABCD-A SWIFT CHECK" is a pre-compiled algorithm which can be applied quickly and effectively to facilitate a systematic and effective response to the wide range of potentially lethal problems which may occur suddenly in anaesthesia. A set of 25 articles describing additional pre-compiled responses collated into a manual for the management of any crisis under anaesthesia has been published electronically as companion papers to this article. This approach to crisis management should be applied to other areas of clinical medicine as well as anaesthesia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/qshc.2004.012856

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient safety risks and incidents caused by problems with computer use are widely recognized as an unintended consequence of healthcare information technology.

    “Patient safety risks and incidents caused by problems with the use of computers are now widely recognized as an unintended consequence of healthcare information technology (IT), 1e3 just as 'revenge effects' have been described after other system changes.4”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Runciman, Merry www.qshc.com on July 12, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/ Qual Saf Health Care: first published as 10.1136/qshc.2004.012856 on 2 June 2005. Downloaded from
  2. Runciman WB, Kluger MT, Morris RW, et al. Crisis management during anaesthesia. A set of 25 companion articles electronically published. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:e1-25. Available at http://www.qshc.com (for a list of these publications see box 1).
  3. Reason JT. Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  4. Runciman, Merry www.qshc.com on July 12, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/ Qual Saf Health Care: first published as 10.1136/qshc.2004.012856 on 2 June 2005. Downloaded from

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Runciman, W. B.
Affiliations
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Runciman, W B
Venue
Quality and Safety in Health Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
156-163
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3901
OpenAlex
W2111332661
Cited by
54
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
crisis management, anesthesia, medical emergencies, simulation-based training, interprofessional collaboration, confirmation bias, surgical complications
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Anesthesia, Anesthesiology, Australia, Emergencies, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Risk Management, Task Performance and Analysis, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review