The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selective detection of phosphopeptides in complex mixtures by electrospray liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry
Abstract
A mass spectrometry-based method that does not involve the use of radiolabeling was developed for selective detection of phosphopeptides in complex mixtures. Mixtures of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated peptides at the low picomole level are analyzed by negative ion electrospray liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry using C-18 packed fused-silica columns (≤320-μm i.d.). Peptides and phosphopeptides in the chromatographic eluant undergo collision-induced dissociation in the free-jet expansion region prior to the mass analyzing quadrupole. Using relatively high collisional excitation potentials, phospho|peptides containing phosphoserine, phosphothreonine, and phosphotyrosine fragment to yield diagnostic ions at m/z 63 and 79 corresponding to PO2 (-); and PO3 (-), respectively. Chromatographic peaks containing phosphopeptides are indicated where these diagnostic ions maximize. The highest sensitivity for phosphopeptide detection is obtained using selected-ion monitoring for m/z 63 and 79. Full-scan mass spectra that exhibit the diagnostic phosphopeptide fragment ions, together with pseudomolecular ions, may be obtained by stepping the collisional excitation potential from a high value during the portion of each scan in which the low-mass-to-charge ratio diagnostic marker ions are being detected to a lower value while the upper mass-to-charge ratio range is being scanned. Good sensitivity for phosphopeptide detection was achieved using standard trifluoroacetic acid containing mobile phases for reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Data illustrating the selectivity and sensitivity of the approach are presented for mixtures of peptides and phosphopeptides containing the three commonly phosphorylated amino acids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pinkse, M. W. H., Uitto, P. M., Hilhorst, M. J., Ooms, B., & Heck, A. J. R. (2004) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0498617 · Cited by 891
Immobilized Gallium(III) Affinity Chromatography of Phosphopeptides
Posewitz, M. C., & Tempst, P. (1999) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac981409y · Cited by 832
The interpretation of collision‐induced dissociation tandem mass spectra of peptides
Papayannopoulos, I. A. (1995) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.1280140104 · Cited by 657
Ekroos, K., Chernushevich, I. V., Simons, K., & Shevchenko, A. (2002) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac015655c · Cited by 306
Catch me if you can: Mass spectrometry‐based phosphoproteomics and quantification strategies
Eyrich, B., Sickmann, A., & Zahedi, R. P. (2011) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201000489 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Huddleston, M. J., Annan, R. S., Bean, M. F., & Carr, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 710-717
- ISSN
- 1044-0305 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009682799
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective detection of phosphopeptides in complex mixtures by electrospray liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/1044-0305(93)80049-5
- The paper
- Huddleston, M. J., Annan, R. S., Bean, M. F., & Carr, S. A. (1993). Selective detection of phosphopeptides in complex mixtures by electrospray liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1016/1044-0305(93)80049-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.