Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The shift of trend has not removed the problems of providing effective feedback.
“As Leki (2002) and Susser (1994) remark, however, the shift of trend has not removed the problems of providing effective feedback.”
From A comparative study of the effect of teacher’s group and individual feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ learning of speech acts in apology letter writing (2020) · cites this paper as Susser, 1994
Cites
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies
Zamel, V. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586647 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Pourmousavi, Z., & Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2020) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00088-w · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Susser, B.
- Corresponding author
- Susser, Bernard
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-47
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094446310
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- process writing, ESL writing instruction, EFL writing instruction, writing instruction, first language writing, writing theory, composition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
