Cited by 525EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackWriting and Handwriting Education

The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing

Paulus, Trena M.·1999·Journal of Second Language Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a difference between teacher feedback and peer feedback as teachers are more subject-matter experts and need less support in providing feedback.

    “According to the literature, there is a difference between teacher feedback and peer feedback as teachers are more subject-matter experts with lots of feedback experiences and knowledge, and compared to students they need less support in providing feedback (Gielen et al., 2010; Paulus, 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paulus, T. M.
Affiliations
Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
Paulus, Trena M.
Venue
Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-09
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
265-289
ISSN
1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979413092
Cited by
522
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI
17.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords
peer feedback, teacher feedback, ESL writing, writing revision, process approach, multiple drafts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review