The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rehabilitation of the Offender
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such subconscious, automatic processes may be one reason why even adequate rehabilitation programs for high-risk offenders show only rather moderate effects.
“Such subconscious, automatic processes may be one reason why even adequate rehabilitation programs for high-risk offenders show only rather moderate effects (Lösel, 2001).”
From Social information processing, experiences of aggression in social contexts, and aggressive behavior in adolescents (2007) · cites this paper as Lösel, 2001
Citations
Cites
Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies
Hall, G. C. N. (1995) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.63.5.802 · Cited by 532
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Andrews, 1990, Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis, Criminology, 28, 369, 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x · DOI · Paper page
- Gendreau, 1999, The forgotton issue in effective correctional treatment: Program implementation, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 180, 10.1177/0306624X99432005 · DOI
- Laws, 1999, Relapse prevention: The state of the art, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 285, 10.1177/088626099014003005 · DOI
- Lösel, 1995, The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta-evaluations
- Redondo, 1999, The influence of treatment programmes on the recidivism of juvenile and adult offenders: An European meta-analytic review, Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 251, 10.1080/10683169908401769 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lösel, F., Bliesener, T., & Bender, D. (2007) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854806295833 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lösel, F.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Lösel, F.
- ORCID
- Lösel, F.
- Venue
- International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 12988-12993
- OpenAlex
- W4235407682
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- offender rehabilitation, offender treatment programs, treatment efficacy assessment, program intensity, program integrity, offender characteristics, follow-up care, community reintegration, methodological issues, rehabilitation guidelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
