Cited by 1Reliability and Maintenance OptimizationTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFault Detection and Control Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MODELLING AND MAINTENANCE OF DETERIORATING SENSORS FOR FILTERING

Murthy, D.N.P.·1982·Theory and Application of Digital Control

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-08-027618-2.50038-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kalman, 1961, New results in linear filtering and prediction theory, Trans ASME Jr. of Basic Engineering, 83, 95, 10.1115/1.3658902 · DOI
  2. Athans, 1968, The Matrix Minimum Principle, Information Control, v. 11, 592

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Murthy, D. N. P.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Murthy, D.N.P.
Venue
Theory and Application of Digital Control
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1982
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
209-213
OpenAlex
W182084085
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • IFAC Proceedings Volumes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
sensor maintenance, degradation modeling, maintenance optimization, filtering, fault-tolerant control, maintenance scheduling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review