The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 129 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Impact of Sensor Degradation on Measurement Uncertainty in Prognostics and Maintenance Decision-Making: State of the art and challenges
Open accessAbstract
Prognostics and maintenance decision-making rely heavily on accurate and reliable measurements derived from sensors. However, sensor degradation introduces measurement uncertainties that compromise the precision of fault detection, remaining useful life estimation, and overall maintenance strategies. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the multifaceted impacts of sensor degradation on measurement uncertainty and its subsequent influence on prognostics and maintenance. The paper synthesizes various sensor degradation mechanisms and existing modelling techniques, emphasizing the growing research focus on developing accurate degradation models. The review also provides an in-depth analysis of how sensor degradation affects measurement uncertainty, exploring both qualitative and quantitative impacts through various modelling approaches and tools. Furthermore, this review examines the implications of this uncertainty on prognostics and maintenance decision-making methodologies, showcasing current mitigation methods and models. Finally, the review identifies key challenges and research gaps, outlining promising directions for future research in sensor degradation and its impact on prognostics and maintenance. By addressing these critical issues, this paper contributes to the advancement of more reliable, adaptive, and efficient Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) systems across various industrial and technological domains.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes how sensor degradation creates measurement uncertainty and how that uncertainty propagates into prognostics and maintenance decision-making. It maps degradation mechanisms, modelling techniques, impacts on measurement quality, and mitigation approaches, then identifies research gaps for more sensor-aware PHM systems.
Key findings
- Sensor degradation affects measurement uncertainty through gain degradation, bias, sensitivity degradation, noise, drift, shift, increased latency, and sensor failure; these effects are reported across temperature, optical, acoustic, motion, pressure, chemical, and power-electronics sensors.
- The review’s systematic search retrieved 824 papers from Web of Science (245), Scopus (369), IEEE Xplore (147), and ACM (63), with 85 papers selected after filtering.
- Prognostics and maintenance studies show that accounting for sensor degradation improves outcomes: Liu et al. (2019) reported a long-run cost rate lower than 36% compared with disregarding sensor degradation; Dinh et al. (2024) reduced maintenance costs by approximately 12.5%; Yoo et al. (2020) found a 6% drop in resilience due to sensor degradation.
- Yuan et al. (2024) reported that without predictive maintenance, financial loss risk can reach 336.13 per day when critical sensors fail simultaneously; Aldrin et al. (2007) linked increased random missed detection rate to 10% or detectable crack size to 0.07 inches with higher failure risks.
Methods
- Systematic literature review following Kitchenham guidelines, organized around three research questions on sensor degradation, measurement uncertainty, and their treatment in prognostics and maintenance decision-making.
- Searches used Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library with a Boolean search string combining sensor degradation terms with error, uncertainty, reliability, accuracy, precision, consistency, quality, prognostics, maintenance, and structural health monitoring.
- Two-phase filtering removed duplicates and non-English papers, screened metadata, then assessed full texts; 824 initial records were reduced to 85 reported papers, with bibliometric, keyword-occurrence, and thematic synthesis analyses.
Limitations
- The paper does not explicitly list limitations of its own review; it instead identifies field-level research gaps such as oversimplified degradation models, limited real-world operating conditions, scarce datasets, and insufficient integration of sensor degradation into prognostics and maintenance frameworks.
- Evident from the text: the review is limited to four databases and English-language articles, and its conclusions depend on the selected 85 papers rather than new experimental validation.
- Evident from the text: many cited modelling approaches rely on assumptions, expert knowledge, or historical data, and the review notes challenges in generalizing models across sensors, operating conditions, and complex multi-sensor systems.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
8 of 129 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Degradation-related features extracted from sensor data can dramatically improve the accuracy of RUL prediction.
“as degradationrelated features extracted from the sensor data can dramatically improve the accuracy of RUL prediction (Qin, Cai, Gao, Zhang, Cheng and Chen, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Qin, Cai, Gao, Zhang, Cheng and Chen, 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Most methods incorporate measurement uncertainty from sensor degradation, specifically gain degradation, bias, drift, and sensor failure, into the measurement model within filters.
“most methods incorporate measurement uncertainty from sensor degradation, specifically gain degradation, bias, drift, sensor failure, into the measurement model within filters”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Huang & Shen, 2021 source
- cites Hachem et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Liu et al., 2022 source
The Introduction discusses a prior filter for sensor gain degradation, and the Problem Formulation incorporates a time-varying degradation variable into this paper’s measurement model. The paper also models a degradation rate and notes that deterioration can eventually cause sensor failure. It does not establish that most methods model all four listed forms of degradation; in particular, the cited passages do not address bias or model complete sensor failure in a filter. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Degradation-induced noises cause the system to become non-Gaussian.
“Degradation-induced noises were reported to cause the system to become non-Gaussian (Liu et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Distributed optical fibre sensors exposed to radiation can experience increased noise intensity.
“Additionally, distributed optical fibre sensors exposed to radiation can experience increased noise intensity (Guo et al., 2024;Khanam et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Guo et al., 2024 source
The Abstract describes optical and electrical noise in Raman distributed fibre sensors and says Rayleigh optical noise increases the total signal intensity. It does not say that exposure to radiation increases noise intensity; the noise it discusses comes from scattered signals and circuit devices, not radiation exposure. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Khanam et al., 2021 source
In C. Results and Analysis, the paper reports that noise in a gamma-irradiated sensor increases with dose rate. III. Experimental Realization identifies that sensor as a Raspberry Pi CMOS camera, not a distributed optical fibre sensor. The radiation-related noise increase is supported, but its application to the specified sensor type is not. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Yuan et al. (2024) introduced a risk-based PdM method that quantifies the impact of sensor degradation on decision-making risks to optimize maintenance schedules.
“Yuan et al. (2024) introduced a risk-based PdM method that quantifies the impact of sensor degradation on decisionmaking risks to optimize maintenance schedules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Yuan et al. (2024) source
- Interpretationcitation
By continuously assimilating data from various sensors, digital twins can provide insights into potential degradation issues, allowing for timely interventions.
“By continuously assimilating data from various sensors, digital twins can provide insights into the potential degradation issues, allowing for timely interventions (Liu, Blasch, Liao, Yang, Tsukada and Meyendorf, 2023;Li, Wang, Fan, Zhang and Gao, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Liu, Blasch, Liao, Yang, Tsukada and Meyendorf, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Li, Wang, Fan, Zhang and Gao, 2023 source
- Findingnone given
Effective solutions have emerged that integrate sensor degradation into predictive maintenance and condition-based maintenance frameworks.
“Effective solutions have emerged, integrating sensor degradation into predictive maintenance and condition-based maintenance frameworks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There are challenges in distinguishing system degradation from erroneous readings.
“Challenges in integrating explicit sensor degradation into RUL; distinguishing system degradation from erroneous readings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
There are challenges in integrating explicit sensor degradation into remaining useful life estimation.
“Challenges in integrating explicit sensor degradation into RUL; distinguishing system degradation from erroneous readings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The calibration approach to model sensor degradation manages sensor accuracy over time by adapting the model to real-world conditions.
“This approach offers the advantage of managing sensor accuracy over time, as it adapts the model to real-world conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The accuracy of prognostics is affected by multiple sources of uncertainties, including input uncertainty, model uncertainty, operational uncertainty, and measurement uncertainty such as sensor errors and estimation error.
“The accuracy of prognostics is affected by multiple sources of uncertainties, including input uncertainty such as initial state estimation; model uncertainty such as misspecified methods, unexplained features, unmodelled phenomena; operational uncertainty such as operating and environmental conditions; and measurement uncertainty such as sensor errors, estimation error”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Goebel, Saxena, Daigle, Celaya, Roychoudhury and Clements, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Saxena & Goebel, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Sankararaman & Goebel, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Sensor degradation worsens error metrics such as Mean Squared Error (MSE) or Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE).
“Thereby, it worsens error metrics such as Mean Squared Error (MSE) or Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hachem, Vu and Fouladirad, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Sensor degradation introduces measurement uncertainties that compromise the precision of fault detection, remaining useful life estimation, and overall maintenance strategies.
“However, sensor degradation introduces measurement uncertainties that compromise the precision of fault detection, remaining useful life estimation, and overall maintenance strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Sensor degradation can introduce systematic errors in the data sensors collect.
“The degradation of sensors can introduce systematic errors in the data they collect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mukhopadhyay, Liu, Bedford and Finkelstein, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ohsuga & Ohyama, 1988 source
- cites Zhang, Si, Du and Hu, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Stochastic matrix transformation offers tools for capturing the probabilistic nature of sensor degradation.
“Additionally, stochastic matrix transformation (van Oosterom et al., 2017) offers additional tools for capturing the probabilistic nature of sensor degradation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Oosterom et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Bias in sensor measurements can cause data distortion.
“Bias in sensor measurements can cause data distortion (Liu et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Mean normalized bias tends to increase, associated with ageing of electric components and accumulation of dust on optical components.
“Mean normalized bias tends to increase, associated with the ageing of electric components and the accumulation of dust on optical components (Bai et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bai et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Sensor failure is linked with catastrophic deterioration process.
“Sensor failure was linked with catastrophic deterioration process (Murthy, 1982).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murthy, 1982 source
- Premisecitation
Anemometers and wind speed indicators suffer from failure due to sticking in a fixed position due to mechanical failure.
“Anemometers and wind speed indicators suffer from failure due to sticking in a fixed position due to mechanical failure (Li et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Continuous glucose monitoring sensors experience drift over time.
“In continuous glucose monitoring sensors, the sensors experience drift over time (Feng et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Feng et al., 2018 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The various manifestations of sensor degradation contribute to increased measurement uncertainty.
“The various manifestations of sensor degradation contribute to increased measurement uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Sensitivity degradation affects the responsiveness of sensors.
- Rests on an assumption: Noise is a pervasive issue in sensor systems and is exacerbated by degradation processes.
- Rests on an assumption: Drift in sensor readings is a synthesised impact and can result from long-term use or improper storage.
- Rests on an assumption: Increased latency is a measurement impact of sensor degradation.
- Rests on an assumption: Sensor failure is an inevitable outcome of severe degradation.
- Premisecitation
Mechanical degradation processes and ageing contribute to drift in pressure and temperature sensors.
“Mechanical degradation processes and ageing also contribute to drift, as shown in pressure and temperature sensors (Bikmukhametov et al., 2018;Mandal et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Membrane dissolution and oxidative ageing in intraocular pressure sensors contribute significantly to zero drift over time, a common issue in long-term implantation.
“Membrane dissolution and oxidative ageing process in intraocular pressure sensors contribute significantly to zero drift over time, which is a common issue in long-term implantation scenarios (Phan et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Phan et al., 2024 source
- Premisecitation
Mechanical degradation in pressure and temperature sensors leads to increased measurement noise.
“Mechanical degradation in pressure and temperature sensors leads to increased measurement noise (Bikmukhametov et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bikmukhametov et al., 2018 source
- Premisecitation
Drift can lead to error in estimation algorithms, as seen in RNN-Direct estimations.
“Drift can lead to error in the estimation algorithm, as seen in Recurrent Neural Network Direct (RNN-Direct) estimations (Loo et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Loo et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Noise can cause significant fluctuations in estimated task space coordinates and other measurements.
“The presence of noise can cause significant fluctuations in estimated task space coordinates and other measurements (Loo et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Loo et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Thematic mapper sensors show decreasing response times over periods of use.
“Thematic mapper sensors show decreasing response times over periods of use (Kamstrup & Hansen, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kamstrup & Hansen, 2003 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Normalization approaches offer the integration of expert insights into sensor degradation phenomena.
“Normalization approaches offer the integration of expert insights into sensor degradation phenomena.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Mechanical degradation in pressure and temperature sensors can lead to sensor failure.
“Mechanical degradation in pressure and temperature sensors can lead to sensor failure (Bikmukhametov et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bikmukhametov et al., 2018 source
- Premisecitation
Ultra-wide Band sensors suffer from bias when transceivers face physical obstructions during transmission.
“Ultra-wide Band (UWB) sensors suffer from bias when transceivers face physical obstructions during transmission (Chughtai et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chughtai et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The main vulnerability of experience-based methods is potential for subjectivity and bias, as accuracy is constrained by the quality and completeness of expert knowledge.
“The approach's main vulnerability, however, lies in its potential for subjectivity and bias, as the model's accuracy is fundamentally constrained by the quality and completeness of the expert knowledge it is built upon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Liu et al. (2019) proposed a maintenance policy utilizing estimated system and sensor states as key maintenance inputs, derived through a stochastic filtering approach using the Kalman filter, applicable to systems operating in harsh environments.
“Liu et al. (2019) proposed a maintenance policy utilizing estimated system and sensor states as key maintenance inputs, derived through a stochastic filtering approach using the Kalman filter, applicable to systems operating in harsh environments, such as wastewater treatment plants, manufacturing systems, chemical plants, and pharmaceutical factories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al. (2019)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Oosterom et al. (2017) presented a maintenance strategy that integrated sensor degradation into its decision-making process utilizing a belief state that quantifies the probability that the system is in an out-of-control state, applied in safety-critical systems.
“Oosterom et al. ( 2017) presented a maintenance strategy that integrated sensor degradation into its decision-making process utilizing a belief state that quantifies the probability that the system is in an out-of-control state, applied in safetycritical systems, such as chemical plants, hospitals, and nuclear power reactors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oosterom et al. (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Liu et al. (2019) method effectively accounts for both system degradation and sensor degradation, ensuring accurate state estimation despite measurement uncertainties.
“This method effectively accounts for both system degradation and sensor degradation, ensuring accurate state estimation despite measurement uncertainties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al. (2019)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In Aldrin et al. (2007), sensor degradation significantly increases the probability of failure.
“The results show that sensor degradation significantly increases the probability of failure (e.g., an increase in random missed detection rate to 10% or detectable crack size to 0.07 inches leads to higher failure risks), while slightly reducing total maintenance costs due to fewer repairs, highlighting the critical need for sensor replacement or recalibration to balance safety and cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aldrin et al. (2007) source
- Premisecitation
Zhang et al. (2023) degradation scenarios show that neglecting sensor degradation can significantly increase the expected LCC compared to strategies that account for measurement uncertainty.
“Specifically, the results from degradation scenarios show that neglecting sensor degradation can significantly increase the expected LCC compared to strategies that account for measurement uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. (2023) source
- Interpretationnone given
The performance of filtering approaches is critically dependent on the accuracy of the underlying system model and the statistical assumptions about process and measurement noise.
“The performance of these filtering approaches is critically dependent on the accuracy of the underlying system model and the statistical assumptions made about the process and measurement noise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Considering degrading sensors allows for the optimization of maintenance strategies, balancing the trade-off between sensor performance and the costs of maintenance.
“Considering degrading sensors allows for the optimization of maintenance strategies, balancing the trade-off between sensor performance (minimizing variance in estimation) and the costs of maintenance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Aldrin et al. (2007) employed a probabilistic risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis to evaluate how sensor degradation affects the reliability of SHM systems.
“To address this, Aldrin et al. (2007) employed a probabilistic risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis to evaluate how sensor degradation affects the reliability of SHM systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aldrin et al. (2007) source
- Premisecitation
In Aldrin et al. (2007), sensor degradation slightly reduces total maintenance costs due to fewer repairs.
“The results show that sensor degradation significantly increases the probability of failure (e.g., an increase in random missed detection rate to 10% or detectable crack size to 0.07 inches leads to higher failure risks), while slightly reducing total maintenance costs due to fewer repairs, highlighting the critical need for sensor replacement or recalibration to balance safety and cost.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aldrin et al. (2007) source
- Premisecitation
Zhang et al. (2023) results demonstrate that ignoring SHM performance degradation significantly elevates the lifecycle cost (LCC) of structures.
“The results demonstrate that the impact of ignoring SHM performance degradation significantly elevates the lifecycle cost (LCC) of structures, underscoring the necessity of incorporating time-varying measurement uncertainties into maintenance strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. (2023) source
- Interpretationcitation
Multi-dimensional correlated sensor degradation remains underexplored.
“Multi-dimensional correlated sensor degradation remains underexplored (Mandal et al., 2017;Hua et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mandal et al., 2017 source
- cites Hua et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Real-time synchronization between the physical and digital environments allows for proactive and precise maintenance strategies.
“This real-time synchronization between the physical and digital environments allows for proactive and precise maintenance strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Existing approaches often fail to model degradation across different operating points.
“Existing approaches often fail to model degradation across different operating points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Traditional degradation modelling methods such as the Wiener process, though widely used, may not be sufficient to capture the nonlinear and complex nature of sensor degradation.
“Traditional degradation modelling methods such as the Wiener process, though widely used, may not be sufficient to capture the nonlinear and complex nature of sensor degradation (Liu et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Current research typically focuses on isolated degradation mechanisms, failing to capture the interdependence among these dimensions.
“Current research typically focuses on isolated degradation mechanisms, failing to capture the interdependence among these dimensions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Dinh et al. (2024) introduced an adaptive PdM strategy specifically designed for manufacturing systems where measurement uncertainty arises from the degradation of health monitoring devices (HMDs).
“Dinh et al. (2024) introduced an adaptive PdM strategy specifically designed for manufacturing systems where measurement uncertainty arises from the degradation of health monitoring devices (HMDs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dinh et al. (2024) source
- Interpretationreasoning
This limitation hinders the generalization of models to real-world data, where degradation conditions vary significantly across different sensors.
“This limitation hinders the generalization of models to real-world data, where degradation conditions vary significantly across different sensors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Performance under a wide range of operating conditions has received insufficient attention.
“Furthermore, performance under a wide range of operating conditions has also received insufficient attention (Mehdizadeh et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mehdizadeh et al., 2012 source
- Premisecitation
The Solar Diffuser Stability Monitor (SDSM) cannot track degradation uniformly across its full sensing range.
“This is evident in the case of the Solar Diffuser Stability Monitor (SDSM), which cannot track degradation uniformly across its full sensing range (Sun & Xiong, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun & Xiong, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The challenge of developing precise models that represent sensor degradation processes persists.
“The challenge of developing precise models that represent sensor degradation processes persists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Multi-rate systems (MRSs) with sensor degradation have received particularly little attention, despite the clear need for robust fusion estimation methods tailored to handle degradation effects.
“Multi-rate systems (MRSs) with sensor degradation have received particularly little attention, despite the clear need for robust fusion estimation methods tailored to handle degradation effects (Huang & Shen, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huang & Shen, 2021 source
- Probably not a substantial claim. 79
- It may state two separate claims as one. 71
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationYuan et al. presented a data-driven method for predicting RUL of sensors considering impacts of sensor degradation on measurement uncertainty, employing a Weibull distribution to estimate failure probabilities over time based on historical sensor failure data.
“Yuan et al. (2024) presented a data-driven method for predicting the remaining useful life of sensors, considering the impacts of sensor degradation on measurement uncertainty, by employing statistical models such as the Weibull distribution to estimate failure probabilities over time based on historical sensor failure data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Yuan et al., 2024 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingreasoningAfter filtering, 85 papers were selected for the review.
“resulting in 85 papers being selected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The selected scientific databases (Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library) are sufficient for a literature search.
- Rests on an assumption: Article metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, and keywords) are meticulously curated by authors and editors to reflect the core content of the article.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataIn the keyword occurrence network, sensor degradation is the most prominent and interconnected keyword.
“At the centre of the network,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The selected scientific databases (Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library) are sufficient for a literature search.
- Rests on an assumption: Article metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, and keywords) are meticulously curated by authors and editors to reflect the core content of the article.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenNo comprehensive review on the impacts of sensor degradation on prognostics and maintenance decision-making has been conducted to date.
“Despite the critical impact of sensor degradation on prognostics and maintenance decision-making, no comprehensive review on this topic has been conducted to date.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The selected scientific databases (Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library) are sufficient for a literature search.
- Rests on an assumption: Article metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, and keywords) are meticulously curated by authors and editors to reflect the core content of the article.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataThe keyword-based search yielded 824 references from digital libraries.
“The keyword-based search yielded 824 references from digital libraries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The selected scientific databases (Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library) are sufficient for a literature search.
- Rests on an assumption: Article metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, and keywords) are meticulously curated by authors and editors to reflect the core content of the article.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenOperator perception of uncertain data, trust, and cognitive biases are underexplored.
“Data quality variations from degradation influence decisions; operator perception of uncertain data, trust, and cognitive biases underexplored.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenThere is insufficient integration of uncertainty management principles across the sensor lifecycle (design, manufacturing, deployment, maintenance).
“Insufficient integration of uncertainty management principles across sensor lifecycle (design, manufacturing, deployment, maintenance).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenThere is a gap in the research on quantifying how much sensor degradation can be tolerated while still ensuring reliable prognostics and maintenance decisions.
“For example, there is a gap in the research on quantifying how much sensor degradation can be tolerated while still ensuring reliable prognostics and maintenance decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenMitigation strategies such as state estimation, filtering techniques, and revised maintenance policies have been developed to account for sensor degradation and sustain system reliability.
“Furthermore, mitigation strategies such as state estimation, filtering techniques, and revised maintenance policies have been developed to account for sensor degradation and sustain system reliability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenStudies have highlighted a range of methods for addressing sensor degradation and measurement uncertainty in prognostics.
“Studies have highlighted a range of methods for addressing sensor degradation and measurement uncertainty in prognostics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenData quality variations from degradation influence maintenance decisions.
“Data quality variations from degradation influence decisions; operator perception of uncertain data, trust, and cognitive biases underexplored.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenCondition-based maintenance lacks integrated models for sensor abnormal behaviours and failure patterns.
“CBM lacks integrated models for sensor abnormal behaviours/failure patterns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenSensor degradation significantly affects measurement reliability, potentially compromising the accuracy of fault detection, remaining useful life estimation, and maintenance optimization.
“The review highlighted that sensor degradation significantly affects measurement reliability, potentially compromising the accuracy of fault detection, remaining useful life estimation, and maintenance optimization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningMaintenance for unknown system states is challenging.
“Policies often lack dynamic recalibration/adjustment; maintenance for unknown system states is challenging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenMaintenance policies often lack dynamic recalibration or adjustment.
“Policies often lack dynamic recalibration/adjustment; maintenance for unknown system states is challenging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenThere are limited self-healing mechanisms or advanced redundancy strategies.
“Limited self-healing mechanisms or advanced redundancy strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenMany of these approaches leverage optimization algorithms to enhance decision-making efficiency, ensuring that both sensor maintenance and overall system performance are effectively managed.
“Many of these approaches leverage optimization algorithms to enhance decision-making efficiency, ensuring that both sensor maintenance and overall system performance are effectively managed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenTheoretical and data-driven approaches, including statistical, probabilistic, and machine learning-based methods, offer deeper insights into degradation patterns and their impact on system performance.
“Additionally, theoretical and data-driven approaches, including statistical, probabilistic, and machine learningbased methods, offer deeper insights into degradation patterns and their impact on system performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenThese approaches often utilize expert knowledge, physical degradation models, and data-driven or hybrid methods to enhance generalization across diverse applications.
“These approaches often utilize expert knowledge, physical degradation models, and data-driven or hybrid methods to enhance generalization across diverse applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThere is a lack of clear standards for managing sensor uncertainties.
“Lack of clear standards for managing sensor uncertainties; need to quantify tolerable degradation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe contribution of journal articles has substantially increased in recent years.
“In addition, it is worth mentioning that the contribution of journal articles has substantially increased in recent years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe number of selected publications shows a trend of being low in the early years but shows a significant increasing trend from 2018 onwards.
“Figure1shows that the number of selected publications shows a trend of being low in the early years but shows a significant increasing trend from 2018 onwards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenVarious modelling techniques have been employed to address sensor degradation challenges, ranging from empirical models based on experimental data to advanced filtering methods within state estimation frameworks.
“Various modelling techniques have been employed to address these challenges, ranging from empirical models based on experimental data to advanced filtering methods within state estimation frameworks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenBalancing maintenance costs, downtime, and degradation risk is complex.
“Balancing maintenance costs, downtime, and degradation risk is complex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe review identified 824 papers across databases: Web of Science 245, Scopus 369, IEEE Xplore 147, and ACM 63.
“| Web Of Science | 245 |”
- Also stated in: § 8. CONCLUSION · plain
“| Scopus | 369 |”
- Also stated in: § 8. CONCLUSION · plain
“| IEEE Xplore | 147 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 8. CONCLUSION · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationUncertainties caused by sensor degradation and limitations in degradation mechanisms can lead to inaccurate determination of machinery condition, which in turn affects the reliability of maintenance decisions.
“However, the uncertainties caused by sensor degradation and limitations in degradation mechanisms can lead to inaccurate determination of machinery condition, which in turn affects the reliability of maintenance decisions (Li et al., 2021;Huynh, Barros and Bérenguer, 2012;Hegedus & Kosztyán, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationFiltering methods encounter filtering error dynamic instability due to sensor degradation, indicating difficulty in deriving exact values of filtering error covariance (FEC) which tends to be increasing.
“Filtering methods encounter filtering error dynamic instability (He, Wang and Zhou, 2008), indicating difficulty in deriving exact values of filtering error covariance (FEC) which tends to be increasing (Huang & Shen, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites He, Wang and Zhou, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Huang & Shen, 2021 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSensor degradation is a well-known phenomenon that impacts the accuracy and reliability of measurements; as sensors degrade over time, the data they provide become less precise and more uncertain.
“Sensor degradation is a well-known phenomenon that impacts the accuracy and reliability of measurements, as sensors degrade over time, the data they provide become less precise and more uncertain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSensor degradation results in distorted measurements, causing observations to deviate significantly from true values, which can mislead Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) strategies.
“Liu et al. (2019) highlighted that sensor degradation results in distorted measurements, causing observations to deviate significantly from true values, which can mislead Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al. (2019)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductcitationThe review protocol followed in this paper adheres to the Kitchenham guidelines.
“The review protocol followed in this paper adheres to the Kitchenham guidelines (Keele, 2007), ensuring a thorough and systematic literature review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keele, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSensor degradation causes increased measurement error and error rates over time.
“Many existing references in the literature note that sensor degradation causes increased measurement error (Mukhopadhyay, Liu, Bedford and Finkelstein, 2023;Ohsuga & Ohyama, 1988;Zhang, Si, Du and Hu, 2018;He, Sun, Xie and Kuo, 2022) and error rates over time (Zhang, Xin, Yin, Wang and Wang, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mukhopadhyay, Liu, Bedford and Finkelstein, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ohsuga & Ohyama, 1988 source
- cites Zhang, Xin, Yin, Wang and Wang, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationAccurate prognostics requires reliable measurement of the states of the system, which can be compromised by sensor degradation and the resulting measurement uncertainty.
“Accurate prognostics requires reliable measurement on the states of the system, which can be compromised by sensor degradation and the resulting measurement uncertainty”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningModelling of sensor degradation provides essential insights for advancing the acquisition of reliable measurements by translating understanding of degradation mechanisms into quantitative frameworks, enabling predictive analysis of sensor performance and reliability.
“Modelling of sensor degradation provides essential insights for advancing the acquisition of reliable measurements as it translates the understanding of degradation mechanisms into quantitative frameworks, thereby enabling predictive analysis of sensor performance and reliability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe quality of measurements provided by sensors is a critical factor impacting the performance of prognostics, maintenance decision-making and optimization, and it can be compromised by sensor degradation.
“The quality of measurements provided by sensors is a critical factor impacting the performance of prognostics, maintenance decision-making and optimization, and it can be compromised by sensor degradation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu, Do, Iung and Xie, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationPoor data quality can lead to incorrect assessments of equipment health, resulting in unnecessary maintenance or unexpected failures.
“Lukens, Rousis, Baer, Lujan and Smith (2022) echoed that poor data quality can lead to incorrect assessments of equipment health, resulting in unnecessary maintenance or unexpected failures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lukens, Rousis, Baer, Lujan and Smith (2022) source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationSensor degradation weakens the correlation between sensor output and actual conditions, leading to reduced measurement reliability.
“Consequently, it weakens the correlation between sensor output and actual conditions (Li, Price, Stott and Marshall, 2007) leading to reduced measurement reliability (Wanga, Al Atata, Ghaffaria, Leea and Xib, 2008;Li & Dai, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Li, Price, Stott and Marshall, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wanga, Al Atata, Ghaffaria, Leea and Xib, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Li & Dai, 2020 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMany maintenance models assume that sensor performance remains constant, which is often not the case in reality.
“Many maintenance models assume that sensor performance remains constant, which is often not the case in reality (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2023;van Oosterom, Maillart and Kharoufeh, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mukhopadhyay et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites van Oosterom, Maillart and Kharoufeh, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSensor degradation is a complex phenomenon driven by a variety of physical and chemical conditions, and is highly dependent on the sensor type and its operational environment.
“The degradation of sensors is a complex phenomenon driven by a variety of physical and chemical conditions, and are highly dependent on the sensor type and its operational environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCalibration methods suffer from a reduction in accuracy, possible errors in the calibration coefficients, and increased frequency of recalibration due to sensor degradation.
“Calibration methods suffer from a reduction in accuracy (Sun & Xiong, 2020;Yu & Wu, 2009), possible errors in the calibration coefficients (Kamei, Nakamura, Yamamoto, Nakamura, Tsuchida, Yamamoto and Wu, 2012), and increased frequency of recalibration (Aldrin, Medina, Allwine, QadeerAhmed, Fisher, Knopp and Lindgren, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Sun & Xiong, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Yu & Wu, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kamei, Nakamura, Yamamoto, Nakamura, Tsuchida, Yamamoto and Wu, 2012 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenTime-dependent degradation is typically modelled using discrete calibration-based methods or continuous normalization and deterministic models.
“Time-dependent degradation is typically modelled using either discrete approaches, such as calibration-based methods, or continuous approaches, including normalization techniques and deterministic models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationNormalized gain shows a decreasing trend.
“Another form, which is normalized gain, shows a decreasing trend (Jiang et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningDeterministic models often struggle to capture the inherent randomness and variability of real-world degradation processes, and their accuracy is highly dependent on precise knowledge of physical parameters that can be difficult to obtain.
“However, these models often struggle to capture the inherent randomness and variability of real-world degradation processes, and their accuracy is highly dependent on precise knowledge of physical parameters that can be difficult to obtain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationStrain-gauge acoustic emission transducers and ultrasonic eddy current sensors suffer from sensor bond degradation and can result in inconsistent sensitivity.
“Additionally, strain-gauge acoustic emission transducers and ultrasonic eddy current sensors suffer from sensor bond degradation processes and can result in inconsistent sensitivity (Aldrin et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aldrin et al., 2007 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenUsing stochastic processes to model sensor degradation captures the probabilistic nature of degradation over time and allows a dynamic representation reflecting inherent randomness.
“Using stochastic processes to model sensor degradation offers the advantage of capturing the probabilistic nature of degradation over time, allowing for a dynamic representation that reflects the inherent randomness of the phenomena.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLong-term use of antimony-based sensors leads to formation of an antimony oxide layer, resulting in decreased response sensitivity and longer response times.
“Long-term use of antimony-based sensors leads to the formation of an antimony oxide layer, resulting in decreased response sensitivity and longer response times (Liu et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationAs sensors age and accuracy diminishes, the complex nature of degraded measurements makes it difficult to accurately capture system states, directly affecting precision and credibility of measurements.
“As sensors age and their accuracy diminishes, the reliability of the data they produce is compromised as the complex nature of degraded measurements makes it difficult to accurately capture system states (Wen et al., 2023), directly affecting the precision and credibility of measurements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wen et al., 2023 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationA uniform distribution was used to model the sensor degradation process.
“A uniform distribution was also used to model sensor degradation process (Huang & Shen, 2021;Wen et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningDeterministic models offer high interpretability because they are based on well-understood physical laws and empirical evidence.
“The primary advantage of this approach lies in its high interpretability, as the models are based on well-understood physical laws and empirical evidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationSensitivity degradation is associated with optical sensors.
“It was mentioned to be associated with optical sensors (Kamei et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kamei et al., 2012 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationUWB sensors often encounter outliers and missing data.
“UWB sensors often encounter outliers and missing data (Chughtai et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chughtai et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationAntimony-based sensors exhibit performance characteristics causing potential drift.
“For instance, antimony-based sensors exhibit such performance characteristics, causing potential drift (Liu et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenFiltering technique-based models enhance adaptability and provide robust uncertainty quantification by leveraging inherent structures of filtering algorithms.
“This approach enhances adaptability and provides robust uncertainty quantification by leveraging inherent structures of filtering algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationWhen sensor deterioration occurs, estimating the exact gain reduction becomes challenging, complicating maintenance and prognostics.
“When sensor deterioration occurs, estimating the exact gain reduction becomes challenging, complicating maintenance and prognostics processes (He et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe normalization approach is fundamentally limited by its reliance on expert knowledge, which can be subjective, and the challenge of defining an accurate non-degraded baseline for comparison.
“However, the approach is fundamentally limited by its reliance on expert knowledge, which can be subjective, and the challenge of defining an accurate non-degraded baseline for comparison.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationContinuous glucose monitoring and energy expenditure sensors may experience missing signals, stuck signals, spikes, and other noise-related issues.
“Continuous glucose monitoring and energy expenditure sensors may experience missing signals, stuck signals, spikes, and other noise-related issues (Feng et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Feng et al., 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenStochastic degradation is analysed using probability distributions or matrix transformations to capture inherent randomness.
“On the other hand, stochastic degradation is analysed using probability distributions or matrix transformations to capture the inherent randomness of the process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationAgeing processes increase noise levels, affecting sensor accuracy.
“Ageing processes further increase noise levels, affecting sensor accuracy (van Oosterom et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Oosterom et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationGain degradation is a common impact in sensor systems and can be caused by ageing, intermittent failure, and transmission congestion.
“Gain degradation is a common impact in sensor systems and can be caused by factors such as ageing, intermittent failure, and transmission congestion (Liu et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSensor degradation causes a shift in sensor measurements, altering the gradient of the load-response regression relationship and distorting the distribution of measurement data.
“Sensor degradation also causes a shift in sensor measurements; for instance, it can alter the gradient of the load-response regression relationship, which distorts the distribution of measurement data (Hickinbotham & Austin, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hickinbotham & Austin, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMeasurement biases can be complex and might not follow a Gaussian distribution.
“Measurement biases can be complex, as reported in (Li & Ying, 2017) and might not follow a Gaussian distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li & Ying, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenAs sensors age and performance deteriorates, the reliability and accuracy of the data they produce are compromised, directly affecting the precision and credibility of measurements.
“As sensors age and their performance deteriorates, the reliability and accuracy of the data they produce are compromised, directly affecting the precision and credibility of measurements derived from them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThe calibration approach heavily relies on the availability of stable and reliable reference data for frequent recalibration, which can be costly and challenging to obtain.
“however, can heavily relies on the availability of stable and reliable reference data for frequent recalibration, which can be costly challenging to obtain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenStochastic process modeling of sensor degradation has the limitation of significant mathematical complexity and the requirement for substantial historical data to select the appropriate process and estimate its parameters.
“The limitation of this approach lies in the significant mathematical complexity and the requirement for substantial historical data to accurately select the appropriate stochastic process and estimate its parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationSensor data records may show long-term and erroneous drift due to a non-uniform degradation process.
“It was mentioned that sensor data records may show long-term and erroneous drift due to a non-uniform degradation process (Sun & Xiong, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun & Xiong, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationDrift increases are associated with a gradual deterioration process.
“Additionally, drift increases were also mentioned as being associated with a gradual deterioration process (Murthy, 1982).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murthy, 1982 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenDegradation processes can be broadly categorized into time-dependent degradation, which may be gradual or abrupt, and stochastic degradation, which is probabilistic.
“Degradation processes can be broadly categorized into two main types: time-dependent degradation, which may occur either gradually (continuous) or abruptly (catastrophic), and stochastic degradation, which follows a probabilistic nature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMurthy et al. (1982) results showed that the optimal maintenance strategy often involves either full maintenance during a portion of the operational time or no maintenance, with maintenance improving the mean time to failure and reducing the variance of the signal estimation error.
“The results showed that the optimal maintenance strategy often involves either full maintenance during a portion of the operational time or no maintenance, with maintenance improving the mean time to failure and reducing the variance of the signal estimation error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murthy et al. (1982)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLiu et al. (2019) method achieves a near-optimal maintenance policy and a long-run cost rate lower than 36% compared to when sensor degradation is disregarded.
“The method achieves a near-optimal maintenance policy effectively addressing sensor degradation and achieving a long-run cost rate that is lower than 36% compared to when sensor degradation is disregarded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al. (2019)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLiu et al. presented a physics-based approach using a Wiener process to model both system and sensor degradation of wastewater treatment plants and employed a Kalman filter to incorporate sensor degradation parameters into state estimation for RUL prediction.
“Liu et al. (2019) presented a physics-based approach that uses a Wiener process to model both system and sensor degradation of wastewater treatment plants and employed the Kalman filter to incorporate sensor degradation parameters into the system's state estimation for accurate RUL prediction through its cumulative distribution function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenDisregarding sensor degradation significantly increases the risk of inaccurate system state estimation, leading to suboptimal maintenance decisions with ineffective actions and increased costs.
“Disregarding sensor degradation significantly increases the risk of inaccurate system state estimation, leading to suboptimal maintenance decisions with ineffective actions and increased costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Sensor degradation increases the probability of undetected failures and unnecessary repairs due to false alarms.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenA principal benefit of empirical models is practicality, as they can often be developed and implemented straightforwardly from available data.
“A principal benefit of this approach is its practicality, as these models can often be developed and implemented straightforwardly from available data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationZhang et al. (2023) developed maintenance decision-making in the context of SHM systems, specifically addressing how measurement uncertainty caused by sensor degradation impacts the reliability of maintenance strategies.
“Zhang et al. (2023) developed maintenance decision-making in the context of SHM systems, specifically addressing how measurement uncertainty caused by sensor degradation impacts the reliability of maintenance strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. (2023) source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationHachem et al. incorporated sensor degradation parameters into state estimation models for wastewater treatment using Gamma and Wiener stochastic processes with particle filters, and RUL was predicted by simulating the future degradation path; this resulted in a significant reduction in MSE and RMSE when sensor degradation was considered.
“Hachem et al. (2024) incorporated parameters about sensor degradation into state estimation models in the case of wastewater treatment using stochastic processes such as Gamma and Wiener, with state estimation carried out through particle filters, and RUL is predicted by simulating the future degradation path based on the current state estimation-based particle filter, specifically, for each”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hachem et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSensor degradation impacts prognostics by reducing the availability of effective monitoring data and making it difficult to distinguish adjacent health states, leading to inaccurate predictions of health conditions and increased risk of failure in critical systems.
“Sensor degradation impacts prognostics by reducing the availability of effective monitoring data and making it difficult to distinguish adjacent health states, leading to inaccurate predictions of health conditions and increased risk of failure in critical systems (Yin et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yin et al., 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationPredictive Maintenance leverages data through the prognostics process, enabling proactive predictions of future health based on current and historical data.
“Meanwhile, PdM leverages data through the prognostics process, enabling proactive predictions of future health based on current and historical data (Roehrich & Raffaele, 2023;Assagaf, Sukandi, Abdillah, Arifin and Ga, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Roehrich & Raffaele, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Assagaf, Sukandi, Abdillah, Arifin and Ga, 2023 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationInvestigating sensor degradation in prognostics is crucial, as accurate measurements are essential for predicting system health and sensor degradation is a significant source of measurement uncertainties that undermine the accuracy of prognostics.
“Investigating sensor degradation in prognostics is crucial, as accurate measurements are essential for predicting system health and sensor degradation is a significant source of measurement uncertainties that undermine the accuracy of the prognostics process (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2023;Zhang et al., 2018;Liu et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mukhopadhyay et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zhang et al., 2018 source
- cites Liu et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationYoo et al. presented a hybrid prognostics method integrating physics-based models of sensor degradation accounting for bias, gain, and drift with linear discriminant analysis to estimate system resilience, resulting in a more precise resilience estimation revealing a 6% drop in resilience due to sensor degradation.
“Yoo et al. (2020) presented a hybrid prognostics method that integrates physics-based models of sensor degradation accounting for faults such as bias, gain, and drift, and with linear discriminant analysis to estimate system resilience demonstrated with the electro-hydrostatic actuator (EHA) system, resulting in a more precise resilience estimation that reveals a 6% drop in resilience due to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yoo et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenDevelopment of integrated hybrid models can be more complex to properly fuse different modelling paradigms.
“Still, the development of such integrated models can be more complex to properly fuse the different modelling paradigms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationZhang et al. quantified the influence of sensor measurement errors on RUL prediction in a blast furnace by modelling system degradation with a Wiener process incorporating deteriorating sensor measurement errors quantified using Relative Entropy, and numerical results indicate controlling measurement error within specified permissible ranges significantly improves accuracy of lifetime estimates.
“Zhang et al. (2018) effectively quantified the influence of sensor measurement errors on RUL prediction in a blast furnace system by modelling system degradation with a Wiener process that incorporated deteriorating sensor measurement errors quantified using Relative Entropy, and estimated failure time using an Inverse Gaussian distribution, numerical results indicate that controlling the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningThe strength of the statistical/probabilistic approach lies in its versatility, offering a diverse toolkit to model a wide array of degradation effects.
“The strength of this approach lies in its remarkable versatility, offering a diverse toolkit of statistical methods to model a wide array of degradation effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationCondition-Based Maintenance is a proactive approach that utilizes real-time monitoring of equipment conditions to assess and determine the necessity for maintenance.
“CBM is a proactive approach that utilizes real-time monitoring of equipment conditions to assess and determine the necessity for maintenance (Golmakani, 2022;Kroculick, 2014;de Meyer, Goosen, van Rensburg, du Plessis and van Laar, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenExperience-based methods rely on historical data and expert knowledge to inform predictions and decision-making.
“Experience-based methods rely on historical data and expert knowledge to inform predictions and decision-making, drawing insights from observations and professional expertise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningThe complexity of sensor degradation necessitates a multifaceted approach incorporating domain expertise, computational techniques, and real-world validation to ensure robustness and reliability.
“The complexity of sensor degradation necessitates a multifaceted approach, incorporating domain expertise, computational techniques, and real-world validation to ensure robustness and reliability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningMachine learning models often act as black boxes with low interpretability, and their performance is critically dependent on the availability of large, representative training datasets.
“However, these models often act as”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenStatistical and probabilistic models are founded on principles of statistics and probability, focusing on deterministic relationships while incorporating uncertainty.
“Statistical and probabilistic models are founded on the principles of statistics and probability, focusing on deterministic relationships while incorporating elements of uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenThe strength of the hybrid philosophy is its ability to leverage first-principles models while using data-driven techniques to capture complex interactions or correct for unmodelled effects.
“The strength of hybrid philosophy is its ability to leverage first-principles models while using data-driven techniques to capture complex interactions or correct for unmodelled effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningThese effects can be systematically analysed and modelled using a variety of techniques, ranging from empirical models to filtering methods, statistical, probabilistic, and machine learning approaches.
“These effects can be systematically analysed and modelled using a variety of techniques, ranging from empirical models based on observations and experimental data to more advanced filtering methods employed within state estimation frameworks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLi and Ying (2017) proposed method significantly improves diagnostic accuracy, enabling the correct identification and quantification of components across five test cases.
“The proposed method significantly improves diagnostic accuracy, enabling the correct identification and quantification of components across five test cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li and Ying (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMurthy et al. (1982) developed maintenance for deteriorating sensors guided by degradation indicators, specifically signal intensity, noise intensity, and drift quantification, applicable broadly to industries relying on sensor-based systems.
“Murthy et al. (1982) developed maintenance for deteriorating sensors guided by degradation indicators, specifically, signal intensity, noise intensity, and drift quantification, which can be applied broadly to industries relying on sensor-based systems for real-time monitoring and control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murthy et al. (1982)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningA primary benefit of experience-based methods is high interpretability, as explicit encoding of expert rules allows clear insight into decision-making logic.
“A primary benefit of such methods is their high degree of interpretability, as the explicit encoding of expert rules allows for clear insight into the model's decisionmaking logic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningSensor degradation has discernible impacts on measurement quality, affecting both qualitative and quantitative aspects.
“In summary, it is clearly demonstrated that sensor degradation has discernible impacts on measurement quality, affecting both qualitative and quantitative aspects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenEmpirical models are constructed using data observed from experiments or real-world measurements, providing data-driven insights into system behaviour.
“Empirical models are constructed using data observed from experiments or real-world measurements, providing datadriven insights into system behaviour.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenA major weakness of empirical models is their limited ability to extrapolate, as predictive accuracy can degrade when applied to varying conditions outside the original observed operating points.
“However, a major weakness of empirical models is their limited ability to extrapolate, as their predictive accuracy can degrade when applied to varying conditions outside of the original observed operating points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationYin et al. proposed a BRB model to encode expert knowledge about sensor degradation and failure mechanisms, represented by probabilities of failure at each time step, accommodating uncertainties and inaccuracies caused by sensor degradation, and using fuzzy logic under Membership Functions to predict future health state.
“Yin et al. (2022) proposed a Belief Rule Base (BRB) model to encode expert knowledge about the sensor's degradation and failure mechanisms, represented by probabilities of failure at each time step of data, which accommodate uncertainties and inaccuracies in the data caused by sensor degradation, and subsequently use fuzzy logic under Membership Functions (MF) to predict the sensor's future health”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yin et al., 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningThe most significant advantage of the machine learning approach is its ability to automatically learn and represent highly complex and nonlinear degradation patterns directly from data.
“The most significant advantage of this approach is its ability to automatically learn and represent highly complex and nonlinear degradation patterns directly from data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenHybrid methods integrate physics-based models with data-driven techniques, either combining physical models of prognostics with data-driven insights into sensor degradation or vice versa, enabling more accurate and robust system health predictions.
“Hybrid methods in prognostics and health management represent a powerful approach by integrating physics-based models with data-driven techniques, either by combining physical models of prognostics with data-driven insights into sensor degradation or vice versa, enabling more accurate and robust system health predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThe core strength of data-driven prognostics is the ability to build effective prognostic models directly from operational data even without detailed first-principles understanding; however, the quality and quantity of historical data govern predictive accuracy and generalizability.
“The core strength of this approach is its ability to build effective prognostic models directly from operational data, even in the absence of a detailed first-principles understanding of the system's failure physics; however, the quality and quantity of historical data directly govern the model's predictive accuracy and generalizability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationLi and Ying (2017) presented an enhancement to gas turbine reliability by addressing measurement inputs affected by sensor degradation.
“Li and Ying (2017) presented an enhancement to gas turbine reliability by addressing measurement inputs affected by sensor degradation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li and Ying (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationSensor degradation leads to inaccuracies in lifetime estimation due to measurement errors, which can cause suboptimal maintenance decisions, increased costs, and elevated safety risks.
“Sensor degradation leads to inaccuracies in lifetime estimation due to measurement errors, which can cause suboptimal maintenance decisions, increased costs, and elevated safety risks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationCarratù et al. proposed a data-driven method for predicting RUL of MEMS sensors using a neural network trained to forecast RUL based on degradation trends captured by the Health Index.
“Carratù et al. (2024) proposed a data-driven method for predicting the RUL of MEMS sensors, that utilized a neural network trained to forecast RUL based on degradation trends captured by the Health Index.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carratù et al., 2024 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenA notable challenge of the statistical/probabilistic approach is the selection and validation of the appropriate statistical model, as an improper choice can lead to non-descriptive results and/or inaccurate predictions.
“A notable challenge, however, lies in the selection and validation of the appropriate statistical model, as an improper choice can lead to non-descriptive results and/or inaccurate predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationPrognostics approaches can be classified into data-driven, physics-based, and hybrid methods.
“Prognostics approaches can be classified into three categories: data-driven, physics-based, and hybrid methods (Guo, Li and Li, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Guo, Li and Li, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenMachine learning methods leverage training processes to learn from data with complex patterns, enabling models that adapt and generalize to diverse scenarios.
“Machine learning methods leverage training processes to learn from data with complex patterns, enabling the development of models that can adapt and generalize to diverse scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenConsidering measurement uncertainty resulting from sensor degradation, the maintenance decision-making process has been adapted.
“Considering measurement uncertainty resulting from sensor degradation, the maintenance decision-making process has been adapted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationHe et al. predicted RUL through reliability metrics by modelling degradation of both system and sensor using Wiener processes and dynamically updating through an ABC algorithm, incorporating measurement uncertainty from sensor degradation during sequential ADT; numerical studies on a gas turbine achieved significantly lower asymptotic variance in RUL prediction metrics compared to a benchmark that
“He et al. (2022) predicted the RUL through reliability metrics, including lifetime quantiles and system reliability, which is used to quantify how long a system will function before failure, by modelling the degradation of both the system and the sensor using Wiener processes and dynamically updating these models through an Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) algorithm, which incorporates”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenNew policies define maintenance actions for both sensors and systems, supported by optimization algorithms.
“New policies define maintenance actions for both sensors and systems, supported by optimization algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationDistinguishing between sensor degradation and system degradation is critical, especially for applications such as SHM, yet advanced techniques to differentiate between these two phenomena are still lacking.
“Moreover, distinguishing between sensor degradation and system degradation is critical, especially for applications such as SHM, yet advanced techniques to differentiate between these two phenomena are still lacking (Mehdizadeh et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mehdizadeh et al., 2012 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationThere is a recognized gap in the integration of physics-based and stochastic models for sensor degradation; combining them could provide more comprehensive and accurate degradation models.
“There is a recognized gap in the integration of physics-based and stochastic models for sensor degradation, while both approaches have been explored separately, combining them could provide more comprehensive and accurate degradation models (Hua et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hua et al., 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningCase studies on how degraded sensor data affect RUL predictions can yield valuable insights for enhancing algorithmic robustness.
“Case studies on how degraded sensor data affect RUL predictions can yield valuable insights for enhancing algorithmic robustness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationThe focus has been primarily on simple systems; however, prognostic frameworks must also account for more complex engineering systems, consisting of multiple sensors and components with interdependent degradation processes, which require further study.
“The focus has been primarily on simple systems; however, prognostic frameworks must also account for more complex engineering systems, consisting of multiple sensors and components with interdependent degradation processes, which require further study (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mukhopadhyay et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningMost current models rely on oversimplified assumptions and fail to capture the complexity of real-world dynamic operating conditions.
“Most current models rely on oversimplified assumptions and fail to capture the complexity of real-world dynamic operating conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenIn brief, the performance of CBM and PdM fundamentally depends on measurement quality, which can be compromised by sensor degradation.
“In brief, the performance of CBM and PdM fundamentally depends on measurement quality, which can be compromised by sensor degradation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Sensor degradation increases the probability of undetected failures and unnecessary repairs due to false alarms.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
Interpretationnone givenIncorporating measurement uncertainty into prognostics and maintenance frameworks has become a crucial strategy for improving system health predictions and optimizing maintenance decisions.
“Incorporating measurement uncertainty into prognostics and maintenance frameworks has become a crucial strategy for improving system health predictions and optimizing maintenance decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationMost existing studies have largely overlooked how sensor deterioration affects RUL predictions, necessitating more focused research in this area.
“Most existing studies have largely overlooked how sensor deterioration affects RUL predictions, necessitating more focused research in this area (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2023;Hachem et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mukhopadhyay et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hachem et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningUnlike traditional methods that rely on predefined degradation models, machine learning techniques can uncover complex, nonlinear relationships and patterns directly from the data that can be highly adaptable to various applications.
“Unlike traditional methods that rely on predefined degradation models, machine learning techniques can uncover complex, nonlinear relationships and patterns directly from the data that can be highly adaptable to various applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningData-driven approaches such as machine learning can support modelling degradation patterns by leveraging historical sensor data.
“Datadriven approaches, such as machine learning, can support modelling degradation patterns by leveraging historical sensor data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenAnother prominent research gap is the need for more comprehensive indicators to capture measurement uncertainty caused by sensor degradation.
“Another prominent research gap is the need for more comprehensive indicators to capture measurement uncertainty caused by sensor degradation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningRoot-cause analysis of the nonlinear physical mechanisms of sensor degradation can provide more accurate modelling, but can be hard and costly due to the multi-factor complexity of degradation phenomena.
“Although root-cause analysis of the nonlinear physical mechanisms of sensor degradation can provide more accurate modelling; however, this can be hard and costly due to the multi-factor complexity of degradation phenomena.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDinh et al. (2024) proposed method achieved an optimal maintenance cost rate; compared to the conventional method, it reduced costs by approximately 12.5%.
“The proposed method achieved an optimal maintenance cost rate; compared to the conventional method, which had a higher cost rate, it reduced costs by approximately 12.5%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dinh et al. (2024) source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningBy simulating the effects of sensor degradation on system behaviour, digital twins can provide better predictions of RUL and identify critical components requiring attention.
“By simulating the effects of sensor degradation on system behaviour, digital twins can provide better predictions of RUL and identify critical components requiring attention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenDespite these advancements, significant gaps remain.
“Despite these advancements, significant gaps remain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationLess attention has been given to fusing degradation data from multiple sensors, and data fusion algorithms can be implemented for multi-sensor degradation systems.
“Furthermore, less attention has been given to fusing degradation data from multiple sensors, multiple sensor data, and data fusion algorithms can be implemented for multi-sensor degradation systems (Arosh et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Arosh et al., 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenVarious approaches have been developed to mitigate sensor degradation by incorporating it into maintenance frameworks through additional indicators, state estimation, and filtering.
“Various approaches have been developed to mitigate this issue, incorporating sensor degradation into maintenance frameworks through additional indicators, state estimation, and filtering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDinh et al. (2024) further analysis showed that the maintenance cost rate is sensitive to the sensor replacement threshold: lower thresholds increase costs due to frequent sensor replacements, while higher thresholds reduce replacements but raise costs from system failures or poor maintenance timing caused by degraded sensor accuracy.
“Further analysis showed that the maintenance cost rate is sensitive to the sensor replacement threshold: compared to the optimal value, lower thresholds increase costs due to frequent sensor replacements, while higher thresholds reduce replacements but raise costs from system failures or poor maintenance timing caused by degraded sensor accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dinh et al. (2024) source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningMonitoring an industrial robot's sensors over several years can reveal patterns of degradation that inform maintenance schedules and predictive models.
“For instance, monitoring an industrial robot's sensors over several years can reveal patterns of degradation that inform maintenance schedules and predictive models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
Interpretationnone givenIntegration of sensor degradation modelling into analysis of measurement uncertainty takes a pivotal role in the domain of estimation and filtering.
“Integration of sensor degradation modelling into analysis of measurement uncertainty takes a pivotal role in the domain of estimation and filtering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenPhysics-based models excel at describing degradation through well-defined mechanisms, while stochastic models effectively capture the probabilistic and uncertain nature of degradation processes.
“While physics-based models excel at describing degradation through well-defined mechanisms, stochastic models effectively capture the probabilistic and uncertain nature of degradation processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningLong-term monitoring projects provide a unique opportunity to study degradation as it unfolds in real time, offering insights that static datasets cannot capture.
“These projects provide a unique opportunity to study degradation as they unfold in real time, offering insights that static datasets cannot capture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenCross-domain case studies comparing sensor degradation and prognostics in different industries can help identify universal principles and best practices that apply across domains.
“Another opportunity lies in the development of cross-domain case studies that compare sensor degradation and prognostics in different industries.This approach can help identify universal principles and best practices that apply across domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationAlthough sensor measurement degradation can be conveniently detected, challenges persist in quantifying the consequent uncertainty, for example, the difficulty in estimating the detected gain degradation.
“Although sensor measurement degradation can be conveniently detected, challenges persist in quantifying the consequent uncertainty, for example, the difficulty in estimating the detected gain degradation (He et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationown dataThe literature witnessed a growing interest related to the relationship between sensor degradation and measurement uncertainty and prognostics and maintenance.
“This can indicate that the literature witnessed a growing interest related to the relationship between sensor degradation and measurement uncertainty and prognostics and maintenance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationExtensive monitoring data and expert knowledge are often required, but effective sensor health data can often be scarce.
“Extensive monitoring data and expert knowledge are often required, but effective sensor health data can often be scarce (Yin et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yin et al., 2022 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationThere is a lack of research on the simultaneous degradation of both the monitored system and the sensor, which may require decoupling their dynamics for effective degradation detection.
“In addition, there is a lack of research on the simultaneous degradation of both the monitored system and the sensor, which may require decoupling their dynamics for effective degradation detection (Jiang et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationCurrent studies frequently overlook shocks or assume their effects are constant, failing to capture the stochastic nature of these events.
“For instance, current studies frequently overlook shocks or assume their effects are constant (Hachem et al., 2021), failing to capture the stochastic nature of these events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hachem et al., 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningPhysics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) can be a standout approach to modelling sensor degradation by integrating physical terms with data-driven adaptability, ensuring predictions remain consistent with real-world physical behaviours, especially when training data may be sparse or noisy, improving model accuracy and explainability.
“Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) can be a standout approach to modelling sensor degradation, by integrating physical terms with the data-driven adaptability power of machine learning, which ensures predictions remain consistent with real-world physical behaviours, especially in scenarios where training data may be sparse or noisy, that eventually improve model accuracy and explainability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationCurrently, measurement errors are often treated as time-independent random variables; however, in reality, sensor errors tend to change over time due to degradation.
“Currently, measurement errors are often treated as time-independent random variables; however, in reality, sensor errors tend to change over time due to degradation (Zhang et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2018 source
The paper relies on this without support.
The selected scientific databases (Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library) are sufficient for a literature search.
“These databases are typically considered sufficient for a literature search.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Article metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, and keywords) are meticulously curated by authors and editors to reflect the core content of the article.
“as these metadata are meticulously curated by authors and editors to reflect the core content of the article.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sensitivity degradation affects the responsiveness of sensors.
“Sensitivity degradation affects the responsiveness of sensors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Noise is a pervasive issue in sensor systems and is exacerbated by degradation processes.
“Noise is a pervasive issue in sensor systems and is exacerbated by degradation processes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Drift in sensor readings is a synthesised impact and can result from long-term use or improper storage.
“Drift in sensor readings is a synthesised impact, can result from long-term use or improper storage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Increased latency is a measurement impact of sensor degradation.
“Increased latency is another measurement impact of sensor degradation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sensor failure is an inevitable outcome of severe degradation.
“Finally, sensor failure is an inevitable outcome of severe degradation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sensor degradation increases the probability of undetected failures and unnecessary repairs due to false alarms.
“Sensor degradation increases the probability of undetected failures and unnecessary repairs due to false alarms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Real-world systems often experience complex interactions between multiple degradation factors, such as operational stress or environmental influences.
“Realworld systems often experience complex interactions between multiple degradation factors, such as operational stress or environmental influences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sensor degradation introduces additional uncertainty in RUL predictions.
“Sensor degradation introduces additional uncertainty in RUL predictions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current prognostics methods struggle with the challenge of limited useful data.
“Current prognostics methods also struggle with the challenge of limited useful data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Digital twins continuously ingest real-time data from sensors and can incorporate sensor degradation models to monitor system health.
“Digital twins continuously ingest real-time data from sensors and can incorporate sensor degradation models to monitor system health.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Decreasing response times presented as increased latency
MinorThe paragraph identifies increased latency as an effect of degradation but then gives decreasing response times as an example. A shorter response time indicates the opposite direction of change.
“Increased latency is another measurement impact of sensor degradation.”
“Thematic mapper sensors show decreasing response times over periods of use (Kamstrup & Hansen, 2003).”
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Wilson, J. S. (2004). Sensor technology handbook. Elsevier.
- Wanga, S., Al Atata, H., Ghaffaria, M., Leea, J., & Xib, L. F. (2008, January). Prognostics of Automotive Sensors: Tools and Case Study. In Failure Prevention for System Availability-Proceedings of the 62nd Meeting of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology accessed (Vol. 12).
- He, X., Wang, Z., & Zhou, D. H. (2008). State estimation for time -delay systems with probabilistic sensor gain reductions. Asia -Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 3(6), 712-716.
- van Oosterom, C., Maillart, L. M., & Kharoufeh, J. P. (2017). Optimal maintenance policies for a safety -critical system and its deteriorating sensor. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 64(5), 399-417.
- Goebel, K., Saxena, A., Daigle, M., Celaya, J., Roychoudhury, I., & Clements, S. (2012, July). Introduction to prognostics. In European PHM conference.
- Saxena, A., & Goebel, K. (2012, September). Uncertainty representation and interpretation in model-based prognostics algorithms based on kalman filter estimation. In Annual Conference of the PHM Society (Vol. 4, No. 1).
- Keele, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Vol. 5). Technical report, ver. 2.3 ebse technical report. ebse.
- Bonhote, C., Chang, J. W., Judy, J. W., Kitamoto, Y., Krongelb, S., Romankiw, L. T., ... & Zangari, G. (2006). Magnetic Materials, Processes and Devices VII and Electrodeposition of Alloys Proceedings. Electrochemical Society Series.
- Park, B., Jung, Y., Ko, J. S., Park, J., & Cho, H. (2021). Self- restoring capacitive pressure sensor based on three- dimensional porous structure and shape memory polymer. Polymers, 13(5), 824.
- Saha, B., Goebel, K., Poll, S., & Christophersen, J. (2007). A Bayesian Framework for Remaining Useful Life Estimation. In AAAI Fall Symposium: Artificial Intelligence for Prognostics (pp. 97-102).
- Chughtai, A. H., Tahir, M., & Uppal, M. (2022). Outlier- robust filtering for nonlinear systems with selective observations rejection. IEEE Sensors Journal, 22(7), 6887-6897.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Experimental Analysis of LiDAR Distance Measurement Errors Induced by Platform Vibration
Moon, J.-H., & Lee, S. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15071357 · Cited by 1
Zhong, Z., Yue, Y., ZHANG, Z., et al. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2026.104597
Discrepancy-Based Predictive Maintenance for AWS Humidity Sensors
Nugroho, W., Fachruddin, I., Handoko, D., Wicaksana, H., & Siagian, S. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Signals and Systems (ICSigSys) · doi:10.1109/icsigsys71160.2026.11613893
“The degradation of a sensor is a complex phenomenon affected by numerous physical events, such as pressure, temper-979-8-3195-1034-1 ature and operational environment [6].”
InfluentialLumbantobing, S. M., Pradana, L. S., Manalu, S. M., Nurtandhee, M., & Hutabarat, M. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3733538
Phase-Guided Bayesian Model-Based Imputation for Missing Sensor Data in Mass–Spring–Damper Systems
Bouraima, M. O., & Zawodniok, M. J. (2026) · IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference · doi:10.1109/i2mtc66907.2026.11694633
Metadata
- Authors
- Thai, T.-T. N., Do, P., Iung, B., & Gardoni, P.
- Affiliations
- Université de Lorraine (FR)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
- Publisher
- PHM Society
- Published
- 2025-11-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2153-2648 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4416193934
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Keywords
- sensor degradation, measurement uncertainty, degradation modeling, remaining useful life prediction, fault detection, maintenance decision-making, uncertainty mitigation, prognostics and health management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review