Ecological Psychology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some prominent advocates have presented ecological psychology as a package deal comprising the concepts one ought to employ, the explanatory scheme one ought to adhere to, and the philosophical views one ought to hold.
“Some prominent advocates have presented ecological psychology as a “package deal” comprising of the concepts one ought to employ, the explanatory scheme to which one ought to adhere and the philosophical views one ought to hold (Michaels & Palatinus, 2014;Richardson et al., 2008;Turvey, 1990aTurvey, , 1990b)).”
From Productive pluralism: The coming of age of ecological psychology. (2024) · cites this paper as Richardson et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 144 · Cited by 286
- Authors
- Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K., Fajen, B. R., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T.
- Affiliations
- Colby College (US)
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Venue
- Handbook of Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 159-187
- OpenAlex
- W1421246344
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 144
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 15.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Keywords
- ecological psychology, embodied cognition, organism-environment system, emergent properties, perception, action, knowing, cognitive agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review