CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Siteless Survey: A Regional Scale Data Collection Strategy

DUNNELL, ROBERT C., DANCEY, WILLIAM S.·1983·Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-003106-1.50012-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-003106-1.50012-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If the unit of analysis for surface distributions was each individual locus of artifacts that together form an archaeological site or the individual artifacts themselves, then the GIS data would be more closely documenting the ancient activities of the people who created the sites.

    “If the unit of analysis for surface distributions was each individual locus of artifacts that together form an archaeological site or, better yet, the individual artifacts themselves, then the GIS data would be more closely documenting the ancient activities of the people who created the sites (Dunnell and Dancey 1983; Ebert 1992, but see Binford 1992).”

    From Flexibility by design: how mobile GIS meets the needs of archaeological survey (2004) · cites this paper as Dunnell and Dancey 1983

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 1981b Surveys and archaeological research. Annual Review of Anthropology 10:63–88. · DOI
  2. Ammerman, 1978, Replicated collection of site surfaces, American Antiquity, 43, 734, 10.2307/279505 · DOI
  3. Baker, B. L. 1980 An evaluation of the results of testing methodological approaches at the East Aberdeen site. Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Bulletin 22:95–100.
  4. Baker, 1978, The size effect: an explanation of variability in surface artifact assemblage content, American Antiquity, 43, 288, 10.2307/279254 · DOI
  5. Binford, 1964, A consideration of archaeological research design, American Antiquity, 29, 425, 10.2307/277978 · DOI
  6. 1977 General introduction. In For theory building in archaeology, edited by L. R. Binford. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 1–10.
  7. 1981a Behavioral archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise.” Journal of Anthropological Research 37:195–208. · DOI
  8. 1981b Bones: ancient men and modern myths. New York: Academic Press.
  9. Binford, 1970, Archaeology at Hatchery West. Society for American Archaeology, Memoir, 24
  10. Cahen, 1977, Surface movements of stone artifacts and their implications for the prehistory of central Africa, Nature, 266, 812, 10.1038/266812a0 · DOI
  11. Chomko, 1974, A survey technique for delimiting activity areas within a site: Part I, Missouri Archaeological Society, Newsletter, 278, 1
  12. 1973 Prehistoric land use and settlement patterns in the Priest Rapids area, Washington. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Washington. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.
  13. Davis, 1975, The ‘exposed archaeology’ of China Lake, California, American Antiquity, 40, 39, 10.2307/279267 · DOI
  14. Downer, 1977, Activity areas, surface collection, and factor analysis at the Phillips Spring site, 23HI216, Missouri, Plains Anthropologist, 22, 299, 10.1080/2052546.1977.11908866 · DOI
  15. 1982 Science, social science, and common sense: the agonizing dilemma of modern archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research. 38:1–25. · DOI
  16. Dunnell, 1978, Assessment of significance and cultural resource management plans, American Society for Conservation Archaeology, Newsletter, 5, 2
  17. Foard, 1978, Systematic fieldwalking and the investigation of Saxon settlement in Northamptonshire, World Archaeology, 9, 357, 10.1080/00438243.1973.9979709 · DOI
  18. Gatus, T. W. 1980 A review and comment on surface and subsurface survey methodologies operationalized in Kentucky. Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Bulletin 22: 141–145.
  19. Guthe, 1931, Archaeological surveys, The Colorado Magazine
  20. Hayden, 1965, Fragile-pattern areas, American Antiquity, 31, 272, 10.2307/2693998 · DOI
  21. Johnson, 1972, Problems in ‘avant garde’ archaeology, American Anthropologist, 74, 366, 10.1525/aa.1972.74.3.02a00080 · DOI
  22. Lipe, 1974, A conservation model for American archaeology, The Kiva, 39, 213, 10.1080/00231940.1974.11757792 · DOI
  23. Meltzer, 1980, Paradigms and the nature of change in American archaeology, American Antiquity, 44, 644, 10.2307/279104 · DOI
  24. 1976 Sampling in archaeology: Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  25. Nance, 1980, Non-site sampling in the lower Cumberland River valley, Kentucky, Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 5, 169
  26. 1981 Statistical fact and archaeological faith: two models in small sites sampling. Journal of Field Archaeology 8:151–165. · DOI
  27. O'Brien, 1979, Special issue on surface data collection, Western Canadian Journal of Anthropology, 8, 58
  28. Ragir, 1967, A review of techniques for archaeological sampling, 181
  29. Redman, 1973, Multistage fieldwork and analytical techniques, American Antiquity, 38, 61, 10.2307/279311 · DOI
  30. 1974 Archaeological sampling strategies. Addison Modules in Anthropology 55.
  31. Redman, 1970, Systematic intensive surface collection, American Antiquity, 35, 279, 10.2307/278339 · DOI
  32. Rick, 1976, Downslope movement and archaeological intrasite spatial analysis, American Antiquity, 41, 133, 10.2307/279164 · DOI
  33. Roper, 1976, Lateral displacement of artifacts due to plowing, American Antiquity, 41, 372, 10.2307/279527 · DOI
  34. Ruppé, 1966, The archaeological survey: a defense, American Antiquity, 31, 313, 10.2307/2694734 · DOI
  35. Schiffer, 1972, Archaeological context and systemic context, American Antiquity, 37, 156, 10.2307/278203 · DOI
  36. Schiffer, 1978, The design of archaeological surveys, World Archaeology, 10, 1, 10.1080/00438243.1978.9979712 · DOI
  37. 1971 Comments on archaeological data requirements and research strategy. American Antiquity 36:9–19. · DOI
  38. Tainter, 1979, The Mountainair lithic scatters: settlement patterns and significance evaluation of low density surface sites, Journal of Archaeological Science, 6, 463
  39. Thomas, 1969, Regional sampling in archaeology: a pilot Great Basin research design, University of California Archaeological Survey, Annual Report, 11, 87
  40. 1975 Nonsite sampling in archaeology: up the creek without a site? In Sampling in archaeology, edited by J. W. Mueller. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Pp. 61–81.
  41. Wiley, 1958
  42. Williams, 1976, The segregation of particulate materials: a review, Powder Technology, 15, 245, 10.1016/0032-5910(76)80053-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DUNNELL, R. C., & DANCEY, W. S.
Venue
Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1983
Pages
267-287
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-003106-1.50012-2
Cited by
178
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review