The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methodological Issues in Americanist Artifact Classification
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The methods for defining culture historic taxa were very successful at creating internally homogeneous units, and chronological ordering of taxa became the primary activity of archaeologists working under the paradigm.
“The methods for defining cul¬ ture historic taxa were very successful at this task, and chronological ordering of taxa became the primary activity of archaeologists working under the paradigm (Dunnell 1986:175).”
From Mobile Farmers of Pre-Contact Southern New England: The Archaeological and Ethnohistorical Evidence (1999) · cites this paper as Dunnell 1986
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 156
- Aldenderfer, 1978, Cluster analysis and archaeological classification, American Antiquity, 43, 502, 10.2307/279415 · DOI
- Anonymous (J. A. Ford) 1938 Report of the conference on southeastern pottery typology. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 1 (1): unpaginated.
- Atwater, 1820, Description of the antiquities discovered in the state of Ohio and other western states, Transactions and Collections of the American Antiquarian Society, 1, 105
- Baumhoff, 1959, Desert side-notched points as a time marker in California, University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, 48, 32
- Benfer, 1967, A design for the study of archaeological characteristics, American Anthropologist, 69, 719, 10.1525/aa.1967.69.6.02a00070 · DOI
- Benfer, 1972, Factor analysis as numerical induction: how to judge a book by its cover, American Anthropologist, 74, 530, 10.1525/aa.1972.74.3.02a00200 · DOI
- Benfer, 1981, Automatic classification of inspectional categories: multivariate theories of archaeological data, American Antiquity, 46, 381, 10.2307/280218 · DOI
- Binford, 1962, Archaeology as anthropology, American Antiquity, 28, 217, 10.2307/278380 · DOI
- Binford, 1963, A proposed attribute list for the description and classification of projectile points, University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers, 19, 193
- Binford, 1963, “Red ochre” caches from the Michigan area: a possible case of cultural drift, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 19, 89, 10.1086/soutjanth.19.1.3628924 · DOI
- Binford, 1965, Archaeological systematics and the study of cultural processes, American Antiquity, 31, 203, 10.2307/2693985 · DOI
- Binford, 1967, Comment on “Major aspects of the interrelationship of archaeology and ethnology” (Chang), Current Anthropology, 8, 234
- Binford, 1982, Paradigms, systematics, and archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 137, 10.1086/jar.38.2.3629594 · DOI
- Black, 1936, A proposed terminology for shape classification of artifacts, American Antiquity, 1, 280, 10.2307/275243 · DOI
- Brown, J. A. 1971 The dimensions of status in the burials at Spiro. In Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices, edited by J. A. Brown. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 25. Pp. 92–112.
- Broyles, 1966, Preliminary report: the St. Albans site (46Ka27), Kanawha County, West Virginia, West Virginia Archaeologist, 19, 1
- Butler, 1936, Pottery studies in the Maya area, American Antiquity, 2, 89, 10.2307/275880 · DOI
- Cabral, 1979, Effect of the scaling method on the classification of archaeological ceramics by numerical taxonomy, The Classification Society Bulletin, 4, 14
- Calabrese, 1973, Discriminant analysis of certain Middle Missouri tradition projectiles, Plains Anthropologist, 18, 344, 10.1080/2052546.1973.11908672 · DOI
- Cambron, 1957, Some early projectile point types from the Tennessee valley, Journal of Alabama Archaeology, 3
- Cambron, 1958, Some early projectile point types from the Tennessee valley, Part II, Journal of Alabama Archaeology, 4
- Cambron, 1958, Projectile point types, Part III, Journal of Alabama Archaeology, 4
- Chang, 1967, Major aspects of the interrelationship of archaeology and ethnology, Current Anthropology, 8, 227, 10.1086/200795 · DOI
- Christenson, 1977, Numerical taxonomy, R-mode factor analysis and archaeological classification, American Antiquity, 42, 163, 10.2307/278977 · DOI
- Clark, 1976, More on contingency table analysis, decision making criteria, and the use of log-linear models, American Antiquity, 41, 259, 10.2307/279515 · DOI
- Clarke, 1973, Archaeology: the loss of innocence, Antiquity, 47, 6, 10.1017/S0003598X0003461X · DOI
- Clewlow, 1967, Time and space relations of some Great Basin projectile point types, University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, 70, 141
- Coe, 1964, The formative cultures of the Carolina piedmont, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 54, 10.2307/3231919 · DOI
- Collins, 1927, Potsherds from Choctaw village sites in Mississippi, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 17, 259
- Collins, 1928, Check-stamped pottery from Alaska, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 18, 254
- Collins, 1937, Archaeology of St. Lawrence Island, Alaska, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 96
- Colton, H. S., and L. L. Hargrave 1937 Handbook of northern Arizona pottery wares. Museum of Northern Arizona, Bulletin 11.
- Cormack, 1971, A review of classification, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 134, 321, 10.2307/2344237 · DOI
- Cowgill, 1968, Archaeological applications of factor, cluster, and proximity analysis, American Antiquity, 33, 367, 10.2307/278705 · DOI
- DeJarnette, 1962, Stanfield-Worley bluff shelter excavations, Journal of Alabama Archaeology, 8
- Dixon, 1913, Some aspects of North American archaeology, American Anthropologist, 15, 549, 10.1525/aa.1913.15.4.02a00020 · DOI
- Drier, 1939, A new method of sherd classification, American Antiquity, 5, 31, 10.2307/275967 · DOI
- Driver, 1932, Quantitative expression of cultural relationships, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 31, 211
- Dunnell, 1971, Sabloff and Smith's “The importance of both analytic and taxonomic classification to the type-variety system.”, American Antiquity, 36, 115, 10.2307/278029 · DOI
- Dunnell, 1973, Fire, air, earth, and water: a rational classification, Mankind, 9, 127
- Dunnell, 1978, Style and function: a fundamental dichotomy, American Antiquity, 43, 192, 10.2307/279244 · DOI
- Dunnell, 1982, Science, social science and common sense: the agonizing dilemma of modern archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 1, 10.1086/jar.38.1.3629946 · DOI
- Eggert, 1976, On the interrelationship of prehistoric archaeology and cultural anthropology, Praehistorische Zeitschrift, 51, 56, 10.1515/pz-1976-510105 · DOI
- Eldredge, N. 1985 Pattern and process in evolution. In PSA 1984, Proceedings of the 1984 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, edited by P. D. Asquith and P. Kitcher. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, in press.
- Fisher, 1936, The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems, Annals of Eugenics, 7, 179, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x · DOI · Paper page
- Ford, 1938, A chronological method applicable to the Southeast, American Antiquity, 3, 260, 10.2307/275264 · DOI
- Ford, 1949, Cultural dating of prehistoric sites in the Viru valley, Peru, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 43
- Ford, 1952, Measurements of some prehistoric design developments in the southeastern states, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 43
- Ford, 1954, Comment on A. C. Spaulding, “Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types.”, American Antiquity, 19, 390, 10.2307/277609 · DOI
- Ford, 1954, Spaulding's review of Ford, American Anthropologist, 56, 109, 10.1525/aa.1954.56.1.02a00170 · DOI
- Ford, 1954, The type concept revisited, American Anthropologist, 56, 42, 10.1525/aa.1954.56.1.02a00050 · DOI · Paper page
- Fowke, G. 1896 Stone art. In Thirteenth annual report, Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office. Pp. 57–178.
- Gifford, 1926, The archaeology of the southern San Joaquin valley, California, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 23, 1
- Gifford, 1960, The type-variety method of ceramic classification as an indicator of cultural phenomena, American Antiquity, 25, 341, 10.2307/277517 · DOI
- Gifford, J. C. 1963 A conceptual approach to the analysis of prehistoric pottery. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.
- Gillin, 1938, A method of notation for the description and comparison of southwestern pottery by formula, American Antiquity, 4, 22, 10.2307/275358 · DOI
- Gladwin, H. S., E. W. Haury, E. B. Sayles, and M. Gladwin 1937 Excavations at Snaketown, Vol. 1, Material culture. Medallion Papers 24. · DOI
- Gorodozov, 1933, The typological method in archeology, American Anthropologist, 35, 95, 10.1525/aa.1933.35.1.02a00070 · DOI
- Gould, 1980, The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline, Paleobiology, 6, 96, 10.1017/S0094837300012537 · DOI
- Greenman, 1929, A form for collection inventories, National Research Council, Bulletin, 74, 82
- Gunn, 1975, Automatic classification: projectile points from west Texas, Plains Anthropologist, 20, 139, 10.1080/2052546.1975.11908742 · DOI
- Guthe, 1927, A method for ceramic description, Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters, 8, 23
- Hammond, 1972, A minor criticism of the type-variety system of ceramic analysis, American Antiquity, 37, 450, 10.2307/278446 · DOI
- Hargrave. L. L. 1937 Guide to forty pottery types from Hopi country and the San Francisco mountains, Arizona. Museum of Northern Arizona, Bulletin 11.
- Hargrave, 1936, A method for determining the texture of pottery, American Antiquity, 2, 32, 10.2307/275037 · DOI
- Hawley, F. 1936 Field manual on prehistoric southwestern pottery types. University of New Mexico Bulletin 291.
- Hayden, 1984, Are emic types relevant to archaeology?, Ethnohistory, 31, 79, 10.2307/482057 · DOI
- Heizer, 1961, The archaeology of two sites at Eastgate, Churchill county, Nevada: Wagon Jack shelter, University of California, Anthropological Records, 20, 119
- Heizer, R. F., and T. R. Hester 1978 Great Basin projectile points: forms and chronology. Ballena Press Publications in Archaeology, Ethnology, and History 10.
- Hodson, 1966, Some experiments in the numerical analysis of archaeological data, Biometrika, 53, 311, 10.1093/biomet/53.3-4.311 · DOI
- Holmes, W. H. 1886a Pottery of the ancient Pueblos. In Fourth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. Pp. 257–360.
- Holmes, W. H. 1886b Ancient pottery of the Mississippi valley. In Fourth annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. Pp. 361–436.
- Holmes, W. H. 1886c Origin and development of form and ornamentation in ceramic art. In Fourth annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. Pp. 437–465.
- Hull, 1965, The effect of essentialism on taxonomy–two thousand years of stasis, British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 15, 2, 10.1093/bjps/XV.60.314 · DOI
- Hull, 1970, Contemporary systematic philosophies, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 19, 10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.000315 · DOI
- Kenyon, 1900, Australian aboriginal stone implements. A suggested classification, Royal Society of Victoria, Proceedings, 13, 191
- Kidder, 1927, Southwestern archaeological conference, Science, 66, 489, 10.1126/science.66.1716.489 · DOI
- Kneberg, 1956, Some important projectile point types found in the Tennessee area, Tennessee Archaeologist, 12, 17
- Knight, 1983, A mathematical technique for dating projectile points common to the Northwestern Plains, Plains Anthropologist, 28, 199, 10.1080/2052546.1983.11909130 · DOI
- Krieger, 1944, The typological concept, American Antiquity, 9, 271, 10.2307/275785 · DOI · Paper page
- Krieger, 1947, The eastward extension of Puebloan datings toward cultures of the Mississippi valley, American Antiquity, 12, 141, 10.2307/275701 · DOI
- Krieger, 1950, A suggested general sequence in North American projectile points, University of Utah, Anthropological Papers, 11, 117
- Krieger, 1961, Comments on “Relationships between the Caddoan area and the Mississippi valley” (J. B. Griffin), Texas Archaeological Society, Bulletin, 31, 43
- Krieger, 1964, New world lithic typology project, Part II, American Antiquity, 29, 489, 10.2307/277989 · DOI
- Kroeber, 1916, Zuni potsherds, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 18, 7
- Kroeber, 1940, Statistical classification, American Antiquity, 6, 29, 10.2307/275944 · DOI
- Lathrap, 1972, Review of “Archäologische interpretation und ethnographischer befund: eine analyse anhand rezenter keramik de westlichen amazonasbeckens.”, American Anthropologist, 74, 964, 10.1525/aa.1972.74.4.02a01040 · DOI
- Lubbock, 1869, The early condition of man, Anthropological Review, 6, 1, 10.2307/3024958 · DOI
- McGuire, J. D. 1899 Pipes and smoking customs of the American aborigines based on material in the U. S. National Museum. United States National Museum, Annual Report (1897), Part I. Pp. 351–647.
- McKern, 1939, The mid-western taxonomic method as an aid to archaeological study, American Antiquity, 4, 301, 10.2307/276087 · DOI
- Mason, O. T. 1885 The Guesda collection of antiquities in Pointe-a-Pitre, Guadeloupe, West Indies. Annual Report for the Year 1884, Smithsonian Institution. Pp. 731–838.
- Mason, O. T. 1895 Influence of environment upon human industries or arts. Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution for 1895. Pp. 639–665.
- Mason, O. T. 1905 Evnironment. In Handbook of American Indians, edited by F. W. Hodge. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 30: 427–430.
- Matson, 1974, Site relationships at Quebrada Toraocac, Chile: a comparison of clustering and scaling techniques, American Antiquity, 39, 51, 10.2307/279218 · DOI
- Mayr, 1981, Biological classification: toward a synthesis of opposing methodologies, Science, 214, 510, 10.1126/science.214.4520.510 · DOI
- Milligan, 1980, An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms, Psychomerika, 45, 325, 10.1007/BF02293907 · DOI
- Nelson, 1916, Chronology of the Tano ruins, New Mexico, American Anthropologist, 18, 159, 10.1525/aa.1916.18.2.02a00010 · DOI
- O'Connell, 1967, Elko eared/Elko corner-notched projectile points as time markers in the Great Basin, University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, 70, 129
- Osgood, 1951, Culture: its empirical and non-empirical character, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 7, 202, 10.1086/soutjanth.7.2.3628623 · DOI
- Parsons, 1967, Bilbao, Guatemala: an archaeological study of the Pacific coast Cotzumalhuapa region, Milwaukee Public Museum, Publications in Anthropology, 11
- Peebles, 1972, Monothetic-divisive analysis of the Moundville burials: an initial report, Newsletter of Computer Archaeology, 8, 1
- Petrie, 1899, Sequences in prehistoric remains, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 29, 295, 10.2307/2843012 · DOI
- Phillips, 1958, The application of the Wheat-Gifford-Wasley taxonomy to eastern ceramics, American Antiquity, 24, 117, 10.2307/277473 · DOI
- Pitt-Rivers, 1875, Principles of classification, Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 4, 293
- Rau, 1876, The archaeological collections of the United States National Museum in charge of the Smithsonian, Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, XXII, 4
- Read, 1974, Some comments on typologies in archaeology and an outline of a methodology, American Antiquity, 39, 216, 10.2307/279584 · DOI
- Read, 1978, Comments on “Cluster analysis and archaeological classification.”, American Antiquity, 43, 505, 10.2307/279416 · DOI
- Ritchie, W. A. 1971 A typology and nomenclature for New York projectile points (revised). New York State Museum and Science Service Bulletin 384.
- Ritchie, 1949, The pre-Iroquoian pottery of New York State, American Antiquity, 15, 97, 10.2307/276387 · DOI
- Rouse, 1960, The classification of artifacts in archaeology, American Antiquity, 25, 313, 10.2307/277514 · DOI · Paper page
- Sabloff, 1975, Excavations at Seibal, Department of the Peten, Guatemala: the ceramics, Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, 13
- Sabloff, 1969, The importance of both analytic and taxonomic classification in the type-variety system, American Antiquity, 34, 278, 10.2307/278410 · DOI
- Sackett, 1966, Quantitative analysis of Upper Paleolithic stone tools, American Anthropologist, 68, 356, 10.1525/aa.1966.68.2.02a001060 · DOI
- Sackett, 1969, Factor analysis and artifact typology, American Anthropologist, 71, 1125, 10.1525/aa.1969.71.6.02a00140 · DOI
- Sackett, 1977, The meaning of style in archaeology: a general model, American Antiquity, 42, 369, 10.2307/279062 · DOI
- Sackett, 1982, Approaches to style in lithic archaeology, Anthropological Archaeology, 1, 59, 10.1016/0278-4165(82)90008-3 · DOI
- Schenck, 1929, Archaeology of the northern San Joaquin valley, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 25, 289
- Seaborg, 1980, The new elements, American Scientist, 68, 279
- Sears, 1960, Ceramic systems and eastern archaeology, American Antiquity, 25, 324, 10.2307/277515 · DOI
- Sharer, 1970, Preclassic ceramics from Chalchuapa, El Salvador, and their relationships with the Maya lowlands, American Antiquity, 35, 441, 10.2307/278116 · DOI
- Smith, 1910, The prehistoric ethnology of a Kentucky site, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 6
- Smith, 1979, A further criticism of the type-variety system: the data can't be used, American Antiquity, 44, 822, 10.2307/279130 · DOI
- Smith, 1966, Maya ceramic varieties, types, and wares at Uaxactun: supplement to “ceramic sequence at Uaxactun, Guatemala.”, Middle American Research Institute Publication, 28, 125
- Smith, 1960, The type-variety concept as a basis for the analysis of Maya pottery, American Antiquity, 30, 330, 10.2307/277516 · DOI
- Sober, 1980, Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism, Philosophy of Science, 47, 350, 10.1086/288942 · DOI
- Sokal, 1966, Numerical taxonomy, Scientific American, 215, 106, 10.1038/scientificamerican1266-106 · DOI
- Spaulding, 1953, Review of “Measurements of some prehistoric design developments in the southeastern states.”, American Anthropologist, 55, 588, 10.1525/aa.1953.55.4.02a00170 · DOI
- Spaulding, 1953, Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types, American Antiquity, 18, 305, 10.2307/277099 · DOI · Paper page
- Spaulding, 1954, Reply, American Anthropologist, 56, 112
- Spaulding, 1954, Reply to Ford, American Antiquity, 19, 391, 10.2307/277610 · DOI
- Spaulding, 1977, On growth and form in archaeology: multivariate analysis, Journal of Anthropological Research, 33, 1, 10.1086/jar.33.1.3629483 · DOI
- Speth, 1972, Mechanical basis of percussion flaking, American Antiquity, 37, 34, 10.2307/278884 · DOI
- Spier, 1917, An outline for a chronology of Zuni ruins, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 18
- Squier, 1848, Ancient monuments of the Mississippi valley, Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 1
- Steward, 1954, Types of types, American Anthropologist, 56, 54
- Steward, 1938, Function and configuration in archaeology, American Antiquity, 4, 4, 10.2307/275356 · DOI
- Strong, 1935, An introduction to Nebraska archeology, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 93
- Strong, 1930, Archaeology of the Dalles-Deschutes region, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 29, 1
- Suhm, D. A., A. D. Krieger, and E. B. Jelks 1954 An introductory handbook of Texas archaeology. Texas Archaeological Society Bulletin 25.
- Thomas, 1972, The use and abuse of numerical taxonomy in archaeology, Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania, 7, 31
- Thomas, 1981, How to classify the projectile points from Monitor Valley, Nevada, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 3, 7
- Tozzer, 1937, Review of Valliant's work in the valley of Mexico, American Anthropologist, 39, 338, 10.1525/aa.1937.39.2.02a00190 · DOI
- Tucker, 1980, Quantitative affirmation of intuitive typology, Tebiwa, 22
- Uhle, 1907, The Emeryville shellmound, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 7
- Valliant, 1930, Excavations at Zactenco, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 32
- Valliant, 1931, Excavations at Ticoman, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 32
- Valliant, 1935, Excavations at El Abrolillo, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 35
- Valliant, 1934, Excavations at Gualupita, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 35
- Vierra, 1981, Factor analysis, random data, and patterned results, American Antiquity, 46, 272, 10.2307/280208 · DOI
- Wallrath, 1967, Excavations in the Tehuantepec region, Mexico, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 57, 10.2307/1006065 · DOI
- Whallon, 1972, A new approach to pottery typology, American Antiquity, 37, 13, 10.2307/278883 · DOI
- Whallon, R. 1980 On the monothetic nature of “traditional” types. A contribution from analysis of Owasco and Iroqouis ceramics. In Proceedings of the 1979 Iroquois pottery conference, edited by C. F. Hayes, III. Rochester Museum and Science Center, Research Records 13: 9–20.
- Wheat, 1958, Ceramic variety, type cluster, and ceramic system in southwestern pottery analysis, American Antiquity, 24, 34, 10.2307/276739 · DOI
- Willey, 1967, Maya lowland ceramics: a report from the 1965 Guatemala City conference, American Antiquity, 32, 289, 10.2307/2694659 · DOI
- Wilson, T. 1899 Arrowheads, spearheads, and knives of prehistoric times. United States National Museum, Annual Report (1897), Part I. Pp. 811–988.
- Wissler, 1914, Material cultures of the North American Indians, American Anthropologist, 16, 447, 10.1525/aa.1914.16.3.02a00030 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chilton, E. S. (1999) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.140152 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- DUNNELL, R. C.
- Venue
- Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1986
- Pages
- 149-207
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review