Cited by 87

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Methodological Issues in Americanist Artifact Classification

DUNNELL, ROBERT C.·1986·Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-003109-2.50007-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The methods for defining culture historic taxa were very successful at creating internally homogeneous units, and chronological ordering of taxa became the primary activity of archaeologists working under the paradigm.

    “The methods for defining cul¬ ture historic taxa were very successful at this task, and chronological ordering of taxa became the primary activity of archaeologists working under the paradigm (Dunnell 1986:175).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 156

  1. Aldenderfer, 1978, Cluster analysis and archaeological classification, American Antiquity, 43, 502, 10.2307/279415 · DOI
  2. Anonymous (J. A. Ford) 1938 Report of the conference on southeastern pottery typology. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 1 (1): unpaginated.
  3. Atwater, 1820, Description of the antiquities discovered in the state of Ohio and other western states, Transactions and Collections of the American Antiquarian Society, 1, 105
  4. Baumhoff, 1959, Desert side-notched points as a time marker in California, University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, 48, 32
  5. Benfer, 1967, A design for the study of archaeological characteristics, American Anthropologist, 69, 719, 10.1525/aa.1967.69.6.02a00070 · DOI
  6. Benfer, 1972, Factor analysis as numerical induction: how to judge a book by its cover, American Anthropologist, 74, 530, 10.1525/aa.1972.74.3.02a00200 · DOI
  7. Benfer, 1981, Automatic classification of inspectional categories: multivariate theories of archaeological data, American Antiquity, 46, 381, 10.2307/280218 · DOI
  8. Binford, 1962, Archaeology as anthropology, American Antiquity, 28, 217, 10.2307/278380 · DOI
  9. Binford, 1963, A proposed attribute list for the description and classification of projectile points, University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers, 19, 193
  10. Binford, 1963, “Red ochre” caches from the Michigan area: a possible case of cultural drift, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 19, 89, 10.1086/soutjanth.19.1.3628924 · DOI
  11. Binford, 1965, Archaeological systematics and the study of cultural processes, American Antiquity, 31, 203, 10.2307/2693985 · DOI
  12. Binford, 1967, Comment on “Major aspects of the interrelationship of archaeology and ethnology” (Chang), Current Anthropology, 8, 234
  13. Binford, 1982, Paradigms, systematics, and archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 137, 10.1086/jar.38.2.3629594 · DOI
  14. Black, 1936, A proposed terminology for shape classification of artifacts, American Antiquity, 1, 280, 10.2307/275243 · DOI
  15. Brown, J. A. 1971 The dimensions of status in the burials at Spiro. In Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices, edited by J. A. Brown. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 25. Pp. 92–112.
  16. Broyles, 1966, Preliminary report: the St. Albans site (46Ka27), Kanawha County, West Virginia, West Virginia Archaeologist, 19, 1
  17. Butler, 1936, Pottery studies in the Maya area, American Antiquity, 2, 89, 10.2307/275880 · DOI
  18. Cabral, 1979, Effect of the scaling method on the classification of archaeological ceramics by numerical taxonomy, The Classification Society Bulletin, 4, 14
  19. Calabrese, 1973, Discriminant analysis of certain Middle Missouri tradition projectiles, Plains Anthropologist, 18, 344, 10.1080/2052546.1973.11908672 · DOI
  20. Cambron, 1957, Some early projectile point types from the Tennessee valley, Journal of Alabama Archaeology, 3
  21. Cambron, 1958, Some early projectile point types from the Tennessee valley, Part II, Journal of Alabama Archaeology, 4
  22. Cambron, 1958, Projectile point types, Part III, Journal of Alabama Archaeology, 4
  23. Chang, 1967, Major aspects of the interrelationship of archaeology and ethnology, Current Anthropology, 8, 227, 10.1086/200795 · DOI
  24. Christenson, 1977, Numerical taxonomy, R-mode factor analysis and archaeological classification, American Antiquity, 42, 163, 10.2307/278977 · DOI
  25. Clark, 1976, More on contingency table analysis, decision making criteria, and the use of log-linear models, American Antiquity, 41, 259, 10.2307/279515 · DOI
  26. Clarke, 1973, Archaeology: the loss of innocence, Antiquity, 47, 6, 10.1017/S0003598X0003461X · DOI
  27. Clewlow, 1967, Time and space relations of some Great Basin projectile point types, University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, 70, 141
  28. Coe, 1964, The formative cultures of the Carolina piedmont, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 54, 10.2307/3231919 · DOI
  29. Collins, 1927, Potsherds from Choctaw village sites in Mississippi, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 17, 259
  30. Collins, 1928, Check-stamped pottery from Alaska, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 18, 254
  31. Collins, 1937, Archaeology of St. Lawrence Island, Alaska, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 96
  32. Colton, H. S., and L. L. Hargrave 1937 Handbook of northern Arizona pottery wares. Museum of Northern Arizona, Bulletin 11.
  33. Cormack, 1971, A review of classification, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 134, 321, 10.2307/2344237 · DOI
  34. Cowgill, 1968, Archaeological applications of factor, cluster, and proximity analysis, American Antiquity, 33, 367, 10.2307/278705 · DOI
  35. DeJarnette, 1962, Stanfield-Worley bluff shelter excavations, Journal of Alabama Archaeology, 8
  36. Dixon, 1913, Some aspects of North American archaeology, American Anthropologist, 15, 549, 10.1525/aa.1913.15.4.02a00020 · DOI
  37. Drier, 1939, A new method of sherd classification, American Antiquity, 5, 31, 10.2307/275967 · DOI
  38. Driver, 1932, Quantitative expression of cultural relationships, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 31, 211
  39. Dunnell, 1971, Sabloff and Smith's “The importance of both analytic and taxonomic classification to the type-variety system.”, American Antiquity, 36, 115, 10.2307/278029 · DOI
  40. Dunnell, 1973, Fire, air, earth, and water: a rational classification, Mankind, 9, 127
  41. Dunnell, 1978, Style and function: a fundamental dichotomy, American Antiquity, 43, 192, 10.2307/279244 · DOI
  42. Dunnell, 1982, Science, social science and common sense: the agonizing dilemma of modern archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 1, 10.1086/jar.38.1.3629946 · DOI
  43. Eggert, 1976, On the interrelationship of prehistoric archaeology and cultural anthropology, Praehistorische Zeitschrift, 51, 56, 10.1515/pz-1976-510105 · DOI
  44. Eldredge, N. 1985 Pattern and process in evolution. In PSA 1984, Proceedings of the 1984 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, edited by P. D. Asquith and P. Kitcher. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, in press.
  45. Fisher, 1936, The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems, Annals of Eugenics, 7, 179, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x · DOI · Paper page
  46. Ford, 1938, A chronological method applicable to the Southeast, American Antiquity, 3, 260, 10.2307/275264 · DOI
  47. Ford, 1949, Cultural dating of prehistoric sites in the Viru valley, Peru, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 43
  48. Ford, 1952, Measurements of some prehistoric design developments in the southeastern states, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 43
  49. Ford, 1954, Comment on A. C. Spaulding, “Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types.”, American Antiquity, 19, 390, 10.2307/277609 · DOI
  50. Ford, 1954, Spaulding's review of Ford, American Anthropologist, 56, 109, 10.1525/aa.1954.56.1.02a00170 · DOI
  51. Ford, 1954, The type concept revisited, American Anthropologist, 56, 42, 10.1525/aa.1954.56.1.02a00050 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Fowke, G. 1896 Stone art. In Thirteenth annual report, Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office. Pp. 57–178.
  53. Gifford, 1926, The archaeology of the southern San Joaquin valley, California, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 23, 1
  54. Gifford, 1960, The type-variety method of ceramic classification as an indicator of cultural phenomena, American Antiquity, 25, 341, 10.2307/277517 · DOI
  55. Gifford, J. C. 1963 A conceptual approach to the analysis of prehistoric pottery. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.
  56. Gillin, 1938, A method of notation for the description and comparison of southwestern pottery by formula, American Antiquity, 4, 22, 10.2307/275358 · DOI
  57. Gladwin, H. S., E. W. Haury, E. B. Sayles, and M. Gladwin 1937 Excavations at Snaketown, Vol. 1, Material culture. Medallion Papers 24. · DOI
  58. Gorodozov, 1933, The typological method in archeology, American Anthropologist, 35, 95, 10.1525/aa.1933.35.1.02a00070 · DOI
  59. Gould, 1980, The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline, Paleobiology, 6, 96, 10.1017/S0094837300012537 · DOI
  60. Greenman, 1929, A form for collection inventories, National Research Council, Bulletin, 74, 82
  61. Gunn, 1975, Automatic classification: projectile points from west Texas, Plains Anthropologist, 20, 139, 10.1080/2052546.1975.11908742 · DOI
  62. Guthe, 1927, A method for ceramic description, Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters, 8, 23
  63. Hammond, 1972, A minor criticism of the type-variety system of ceramic analysis, American Antiquity, 37, 450, 10.2307/278446 · DOI
  64. Hargrave. L. L. 1937 Guide to forty pottery types from Hopi country and the San Francisco mountains, Arizona. Museum of Northern Arizona, Bulletin 11.
  65. Hargrave, 1936, A method for determining the texture of pottery, American Antiquity, 2, 32, 10.2307/275037 · DOI
  66. Hawley, F. 1936 Field manual on prehistoric southwestern pottery types. University of New Mexico Bulletin 291.
  67. Hayden, 1984, Are emic types relevant to archaeology?, Ethnohistory, 31, 79, 10.2307/482057 · DOI
  68. Heizer, 1961, The archaeology of two sites at Eastgate, Churchill county, Nevada: Wagon Jack shelter, University of California, Anthropological Records, 20, 119
  69. Heizer, R. F., and T. R. Hester 1978 Great Basin projectile points: forms and chronology. Ballena Press Publications in Archaeology, Ethnology, and History 10.
  70. Hodson, 1966, Some experiments in the numerical analysis of archaeological data, Biometrika, 53, 311, 10.1093/biomet/53.3-4.311 · DOI
  71. Holmes, W. H. 1886a Pottery of the ancient Pueblos. In Fourth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. Pp. 257–360.
  72. Holmes, W. H. 1886b Ancient pottery of the Mississippi valley. In Fourth annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. Pp. 361–436.
  73. Holmes, W. H. 1886c Origin and development of form and ornamentation in ceramic art. In Fourth annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. Pp. 437–465.
  74. Hull, 1965, The effect of essentialism on taxonomy–two thousand years of stasis, British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 15, 2, 10.1093/bjps/XV.60.314 · DOI
  75. Hull, 1970, Contemporary systematic philosophies, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 19, 10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.000315 · DOI
  76. Kenyon, 1900, Australian aboriginal stone implements. A suggested classification, Royal Society of Victoria, Proceedings, 13, 191
  77. Kidder, 1927, Southwestern archaeological conference, Science, 66, 489, 10.1126/science.66.1716.489 · DOI
  78. Kneberg, 1956, Some important projectile point types found in the Tennessee area, Tennessee Archaeologist, 12, 17
  79. Knight, 1983, A mathematical technique for dating projectile points common to the Northwestern Plains, Plains Anthropologist, 28, 199, 10.1080/2052546.1983.11909130 · DOI
  80. Krieger, 1944, The typological concept, American Antiquity, 9, 271, 10.2307/275785 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Krieger, 1947, The eastward extension of Puebloan datings toward cultures of the Mississippi valley, American Antiquity, 12, 141, 10.2307/275701 · DOI
  82. Krieger, 1950, A suggested general sequence in North American projectile points, University of Utah, Anthropological Papers, 11, 117
  83. Krieger, 1961, Comments on “Relationships between the Caddoan area and the Mississippi valley” (J. B. Griffin), Texas Archaeological Society, Bulletin, 31, 43
  84. Krieger, 1964, New world lithic typology project, Part II, American Antiquity, 29, 489, 10.2307/277989 · DOI
  85. Kroeber, 1916, Zuni potsherds, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 18, 7
  86. Kroeber, 1940, Statistical classification, American Antiquity, 6, 29, 10.2307/275944 · DOI
  87. Lathrap, 1972, Review of “Archäologische interpretation und ethnographischer befund: eine analyse anhand rezenter keramik de westlichen amazonasbeckens.”, American Anthropologist, 74, 964, 10.1525/aa.1972.74.4.02a01040 · DOI
  88. Lubbock, 1869, The early condition of man, Anthropological Review, 6, 1, 10.2307/3024958 · DOI
  89. McGuire, J. D. 1899 Pipes and smoking customs of the American aborigines based on material in the U. S. National Museum. United States National Museum, Annual Report (1897), Part I. Pp. 351–647.
  90. McKern, 1939, The mid-western taxonomic method as an aid to archaeological study, American Antiquity, 4, 301, 10.2307/276087 · DOI
  91. Mason, O. T. 1885 The Guesda collection of antiquities in Pointe-a-Pitre, Guadeloupe, West Indies. Annual Report for the Year 1884, Smithsonian Institution. Pp. 731–838.
  92. Mason, O. T. 1895 Influence of environment upon human industries or arts. Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution for 1895. Pp. 639–665.
  93. Mason, O. T. 1905 Evnironment. In Handbook of American Indians, edited by F. W. Hodge. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 30: 427–430.
  94. Matson, 1974, Site relationships at Quebrada Toraocac, Chile: a comparison of clustering and scaling techniques, American Antiquity, 39, 51, 10.2307/279218 · DOI
  95. Mayr, 1981, Biological classification: toward a synthesis of opposing methodologies, Science, 214, 510, 10.1126/science.214.4520.510 · DOI
  96. Milligan, 1980, An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms, Psychomerika, 45, 325, 10.1007/BF02293907 · DOI
  97. Nelson, 1916, Chronology of the Tano ruins, New Mexico, American Anthropologist, 18, 159, 10.1525/aa.1916.18.2.02a00010 · DOI
  98. O'Connell, 1967, Elko eared/Elko corner-notched projectile points as time markers in the Great Basin, University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, 70, 129
  99. Osgood, 1951, Culture: its empirical and non-empirical character, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 7, 202, 10.1086/soutjanth.7.2.3628623 · DOI
  100. Parsons, 1967, Bilbao, Guatemala: an archaeological study of the Pacific coast Cotzumalhuapa region, Milwaukee Public Museum, Publications in Anthropology, 11
  101. Peebles, 1972, Monothetic-divisive analysis of the Moundville burials: an initial report, Newsletter of Computer Archaeology, 8, 1
  102. Petrie, 1899, Sequences in prehistoric remains, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 29, 295, 10.2307/2843012 · DOI
  103. Phillips, 1958, The application of the Wheat-Gifford-Wasley taxonomy to eastern ceramics, American Antiquity, 24, 117, 10.2307/277473 · DOI
  104. Pitt-Rivers, 1875, Principles of classification, Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 4, 293
  105. Rau, 1876, The archaeological collections of the United States National Museum in charge of the Smithsonian, Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, XXII, 4
  106. Read, 1974, Some comments on typologies in archaeology and an outline of a methodology, American Antiquity, 39, 216, 10.2307/279584 · DOI
  107. Read, 1978, Comments on “Cluster analysis and archaeological classification.”, American Antiquity, 43, 505, 10.2307/279416 · DOI
  108. Ritchie, W. A. 1971 A typology and nomenclature for New York projectile points (revised). New York State Museum and Science Service Bulletin 384.
  109. Ritchie, 1949, The pre-Iroquoian pottery of New York State, American Antiquity, 15, 97, 10.2307/276387 · DOI
  110. Rouse, 1960, The classification of artifacts in archaeology, American Antiquity, 25, 313, 10.2307/277514 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Sabloff, 1975, Excavations at Seibal, Department of the Peten, Guatemala: the ceramics, Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, 13
  112. Sabloff, 1969, The importance of both analytic and taxonomic classification in the type-variety system, American Antiquity, 34, 278, 10.2307/278410 · DOI
  113. Sackett, 1966, Quantitative analysis of Upper Paleolithic stone tools, American Anthropologist, 68, 356, 10.1525/aa.1966.68.2.02a001060 · DOI
  114. Sackett, 1969, Factor analysis and artifact typology, American Anthropologist, 71, 1125, 10.1525/aa.1969.71.6.02a00140 · DOI
  115. Sackett, 1977, The meaning of style in archaeology: a general model, American Antiquity, 42, 369, 10.2307/279062 · DOI
  116. Sackett, 1982, Approaches to style in lithic archaeology, Anthropological Archaeology, 1, 59, 10.1016/0278-4165(82)90008-3 · DOI
  117. Schenck, 1929, Archaeology of the northern San Joaquin valley, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 25, 289
  118. Seaborg, 1980, The new elements, American Scientist, 68, 279
  119. Sears, 1960, Ceramic systems and eastern archaeology, American Antiquity, 25, 324, 10.2307/277515 · DOI
  120. Sharer, 1970, Preclassic ceramics from Chalchuapa, El Salvador, and their relationships with the Maya lowlands, American Antiquity, 35, 441, 10.2307/278116 · DOI
  121. Smith, 1910, The prehistoric ethnology of a Kentucky site, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 6
  122. Smith, 1979, A further criticism of the type-variety system: the data can't be used, American Antiquity, 44, 822, 10.2307/279130 · DOI
  123. Smith, 1966, Maya ceramic varieties, types, and wares at Uaxactun: supplement to “ceramic sequence at Uaxactun, Guatemala.”, Middle American Research Institute Publication, 28, 125
  124. Smith, 1960, The type-variety concept as a basis for the analysis of Maya pottery, American Antiquity, 30, 330, 10.2307/277516 · DOI
  125. Sober, 1980, Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism, Philosophy of Science, 47, 350, 10.1086/288942 · DOI
  126. Sokal, 1966, Numerical taxonomy, Scientific American, 215, 106, 10.1038/scientificamerican1266-106 · DOI
  127. Spaulding, 1953, Review of “Measurements of some prehistoric design developments in the southeastern states.”, American Anthropologist, 55, 588, 10.1525/aa.1953.55.4.02a00170 · DOI
  128. Spaulding, 1953, Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types, American Antiquity, 18, 305, 10.2307/277099 · DOI · Paper page
  129. Spaulding, 1954, Reply, American Anthropologist, 56, 112
  130. Spaulding, 1954, Reply to Ford, American Antiquity, 19, 391, 10.2307/277610 · DOI
  131. Spaulding, 1977, On growth and form in archaeology: multivariate analysis, Journal of Anthropological Research, 33, 1, 10.1086/jar.33.1.3629483 · DOI
  132. Speth, 1972, Mechanical basis of percussion flaking, American Antiquity, 37, 34, 10.2307/278884 · DOI
  133. Spier, 1917, An outline for a chronology of Zuni ruins, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 18
  134. Squier, 1848, Ancient monuments of the Mississippi valley, Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 1
  135. Steward, 1954, Types of types, American Anthropologist, 56, 54
  136. Steward, 1938, Function and configuration in archaeology, American Antiquity, 4, 4, 10.2307/275356 · DOI
  137. Strong, 1935, An introduction to Nebraska archeology, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 93
  138. Strong, 1930, Archaeology of the Dalles-Deschutes region, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 29, 1
  139. Suhm, D. A., A. D. Krieger, and E. B. Jelks 1954 An introductory handbook of Texas archaeology. Texas Archaeological Society Bulletin 25.
  140. Thomas, 1972, The use and abuse of numerical taxonomy in archaeology, Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania, 7, 31
  141. Thomas, 1981, How to classify the projectile points from Monitor Valley, Nevada, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 3, 7
  142. Tozzer, 1937, Review of Valliant's work in the valley of Mexico, American Anthropologist, 39, 338, 10.1525/aa.1937.39.2.02a00190 · DOI
  143. Tucker, 1980, Quantitative affirmation of intuitive typology, Tebiwa, 22
  144. Uhle, 1907, The Emeryville shellmound, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 7
  145. Valliant, 1930, Excavations at Zactenco, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 32
  146. Valliant, 1931, Excavations at Ticoman, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 32
  147. Valliant, 1935, Excavations at El Abrolillo, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 35
  148. Valliant, 1934, Excavations at Gualupita, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 35
  149. Vierra, 1981, Factor analysis, random data, and patterned results, American Antiquity, 46, 272, 10.2307/280208 · DOI
  150. Wallrath, 1967, Excavations in the Tehuantepec region, Mexico, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 57, 10.2307/1006065 · DOI
  151. Whallon, 1972, A new approach to pottery typology, American Antiquity, 37, 13, 10.2307/278883 · DOI
  152. Whallon, R. 1980 On the monothetic nature of “traditional” types. A contribution from analysis of Owasco and Iroqouis ceramics. In Proceedings of the 1979 Iroquois pottery conference, edited by C. F. Hayes, III. Rochester Museum and Science Center, Research Records 13: 9–20.
  153. Wheat, 1958, Ceramic variety, type cluster, and ceramic system in southwestern pottery analysis, American Antiquity, 24, 34, 10.2307/276739 · DOI
  154. Willey, 1967, Maya lowland ceramics: a report from the 1965 Guatemala City conference, American Antiquity, 32, 289, 10.2307/2694659 · DOI
  155. Wilson, T. 1899 Arrowheads, spearheads, and knives of prehistoric times. United States National Museum, Annual Report (1897), Part I. Pp. 811–988.
  156. Wissler, 1914, Material cultures of the North American Indians, American Anthropologist, 16, 447, 10.1525/aa.1914.16.3.02a00030 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DUNNELL, R. C.
Venue
Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1986
Pages
149-207
Cited by
87
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review