The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring the User Experience
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, many freshmen dropout for emotional/psychological reasons.31”
From Feasibility of a Prototype Web-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Prevention Program for College Students. (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future
Lewis, J. R. (2018) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307 · Cited by 1,958
Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI
Caine, K. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858498 · Cited by 657
The state of user-centered design practice
Mao, J.-Y., Vredenburg, K., Smith, P. W., & Carey, T. (2005) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1047671.1047677 · Cited by 465
Usability testing: a review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method
Bastien, J. M. C. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.12.004 · Cited by 388
Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016) · Quantifying the User Experience · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802308-2.00002-3 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Venue
- Elsevier eBooks
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2008
- OpenAlex
- W2548786785
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- user experience, user experience evaluation, usability evaluation, user-centered design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
