Cited by 320Usability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology InteractionTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measuring the User Experience

·2008·Elsevier eBooks

DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-373558-4.x0001-5

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-373558-4.x0001-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Still being checked.

Sorted by citations

The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future
Lewis, J. R. (2018) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307 · Cited by 1,958
Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI
Caine, K. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858498 · Cited by 657
The state of user-centered design practice
Mao, J.-Y., Vredenburg, K., Smith, P. W., & Carey, T. (2005) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1047671.1047677 · Cited by 465
Usability testing: a review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method
Bastien, J. M. C. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.12.004 · Cited by 388
Quantifying user research
Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016) · Quantifying the User Experience · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802308-2.00002-3 · Cited by 312
I Lead, You Help but Only with Enough Details: Understanding User Experience of Co-Creation with Artificial Intelligence
Oh, C., Song, J., Choi, J., Kim, S., Lee, S., & Suh, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174223 · Cited by 301
Artificial Intelligence-Based Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions: Systematic Literature Review
Schachner, T., Keller, R., & v Wangenheim, F. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20701 · Cited by 267
The Effectiveness of Prompts to Promote Engagement With Digital Interventions: A Systematic Review
Alkhaldi, G., Hamilton, F. L., Lau, R., Webster, R., Michie, S., & Murray, E. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4790 · Cited by 273
Attitudes towards user experience (UX) measurement
Law, E. L., van Schaik, P., & Roto, V. (2013) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.09.006 · Cited by 273
Measuring the user experience on a large scale: user-centered metrics for web applications
Rodden, K., Hutchinson, H., & Fu, X. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753687 · Cited by 233
User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review
Witteman, H. O., Dansokho, S. C., Colquhoun, H., Coulter, A., Dugas, M., Fagerlin, A., Giguere, A. M., Glouberman, S., Haslett, L., Hoffman, A., et al. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-11 · Cited by 202
Web-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Mental Health Problems in College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Levin, M. E., Haeger, J. A., Pierce, B. G., & Twohig, M. P. (2017) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445516659645 · Cited by 207
Methodological issues in research on web-based behavioral interventions
Danaher, B. G., & Seeley, J. R. (2009) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9129-0 · Cited by 193
Feasibility of a Prototype Web-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Prevention Program for College Students.
Levin, M. E., Pistorello, J., Seeley, J. R., & Hayes, S. C. (2014) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2013.843533 · Cited by 179
SoK: Taxonomy of Attacks on Open-Source Software Supply Chains
Ladisa, P., Plate, H., Martinez, M., & Barais, O. (2023) · 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp46215.2023.10179304 · Cited by 208
Leveraging human-centered design to implement modern psychological science: Return on an early investment.
Lyon, A. R., Brewer, S. K., & Areán, P. A. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000652 · Cited by 152
A framework for evaluating the usability of mobile phones based on multi-level, hierarchical model of usability factors
Heo, J., Ham, D.-H., Park, S., Song, C., & Yoon, W. C. (2009) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2009.05.006 · Cited by 140
An evaluation of urban green space in Shanghai, China, using eye tracking
Li, J., Zhang, Z., Jing, F., Gao, J., Ma, J., Shao, G., & Scott, N. (2020) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126903 · Cited by 134
Rethinking Thinking Aloud
Alhadreti, O., & Mayhew, P. J. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173618 · Cited by 133
On the value of Virtual Worlds for collaborative design
Koutsabasis, P., Vosinakis, S., Malisova, K., & Paparounas, N. (2011) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.11.004 · Cited by 127
Making sense of business process descriptions: An experimental comparison of graphical and textual notations
Ottensooser, A., Fekete, A. D., Reijers, H. A., Mendling, J., & Menictas, C. (2011) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.023 · Cited by 134
Digital storytelling and audience engagement in cultural heritage management: A collaborative model based on the Digital City of Thessaloniki
Psomadaki, O. I., Dimoulas, C. A., Kalliris, G. M., & Paschalidis, G. (2019) · Journal of Cultural Heritage · doi:10.1016/j.culher.2018.07.016 · Cited by 124
MomMoodBooster Web-Based Intervention for Postpartum Depression: Feasibility Trial Results
Danaher, B. G., Milgrom, J., Seeley, J. R., Stuart, S., Schembri, C., Tyler, M. S., Ericksen, J., Lester, W., Gemmill, A. W., Kosty, D. B., et al. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2876 · Cited by 124
Quantifying User Research
Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2012) · Quantifying the User Experience · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-384968-7.00002-3 · Cited by 117
Design and development of a semi‐autonomous agricultural vineyard sprayer: Human–robot interaction aspects
Adamides, G., Katsanos, C., Constantinou, I. P., Christou, G., Xenos, M., Hadzilacos, T., & Edan, Y. (2017) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21721 · Cited by 116
Web-Based Self-Help for Preventing Mental Health Problems in Universities: Comparing Acceptance and Commitment Training to Mental Health Education
Levin, M. E., Hayes, S. C., Pistorello, J., & Seeley, J. R. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22254 · Cited by 103
Too good to be bad: Favorable product expectations boost subjective usability ratings
Raita, E., & Oulasvirta, A. (2011) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.002 · Cited by 89
Detecting task demand via an eye tracking machine learning system
Shojaeizadeh, M., Djamasbi, S., Paffenroth, R. C., & Trapp, A. C. (2018) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2018.10.012 · Cited by 90
A stress management app intervention for cancer survivors: design, development, and usability testing
Børøsund, E., Mirkovic, J., Clark, M. M., Ehlers, S. L., Andrykowski, M. A., Bergland, A., Westeng, M., & Solberg Nes, L. (2018) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/formative.9954 · Cited by 73
Technical evaluation, testing, and validatiaon of the usability of electronic health records
Lowry, S. Z., Quinn, M. T., Ramaiah, M., Schumacher, R. M., Patterson, E. S., North, R. A., Zhang, J., Gibbons, M. C., & Abbott, P. A. (2012) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.7804 · Cited by 81
Evaluation of e-commerce websites accessibility and usability: an e-commerce platform analysis with the inclusion of blind users
Gonçalves, R., Rocha, T., Martins, J., Branco, F., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0557-5 · Cited by 79
User-Centered Design: Why and How to Put Users First in Software Development
Wallach, D., & Scholz, S. C. (2012) · Management for professionals · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31371-4_2 · Cited by 89
Usability and functionality factors of the social network site application users from the perspective of uses and gratification theory
Korhan, O., & Ersoy, M. (2016) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-015-0236-7 · Cited by 79
The Efficacy and Acceptability of Third-Wave Behavioral and Cognitive eHealth Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
O’Connor, M., Munnelly, A., Whelan, R., & McHugh, L. (2018) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2017.07.007 · Cited by 62
Web-based Intervention for Postpartum Depression: Formative Research and Design of the MomMoodBooster Program
Danaher, B. G., Milgrom, J., Seeley, J. R., Stuart, S., Schembri, C., Tyler, M. S., Ericksen, J., Lester, W., Gemmill, A. W., & Lewinsohn, P. (2012) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.2329 · Cited by 67
Future Challenges for Global Tourism
von Bergner, N. M., & Lohmann, M. (2013) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287513506292 · Cited by 73
On the Use of Experiments in Design Science Research: A Proposition of an Evaluation Framework
Mettler, T., Eurich, M., & Winter, R. (2014) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03410 · Cited by 72
Evaluating an Adjunctive Mobile App to Enhance Psychological Flexibility in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
Levin, M. E., Haeger, J., Pierce, B., & Cruz, R. A. (2017) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445517719661 · Cited by 58
The Contextualized Technology Adaptation Process (CTAP): Optimizing Health Information Technology to Improve Mental Health Systems
Lyon, A. R., Wasse, J. K., Ludwig, K., Zachry, M., Bruns, E. J., Unützer, J., & McCauley, E. (2016) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-015-0637-x · Cited by 63
Augmented Reality Cubes for Cognitive Gaming: Preliminary Usability and Game Experience Testing
Boletsis, C., & McCallum, S. (2016) · International Journal of Serious Games · doi:10.17083/ijsg.v3i1.106 · Cited by 63
Operability, Usefulness, and Task-Technology Fit of an mHealth App for Delivering Primary Health Care Services by Community Health Workers in Underserved Areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan: Qualitative Study
Zaidi, S., Kazi, A. M., Riaz, A., Ali, A., Najmi, R., Jabeen, R., Khudadad, U., & Sayani, S. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18414 · Cited by 55
Design for assembly and disassembly for remanufacturing
Soh, S. L., Ong, S. K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2016) · Assembly Automation · doi:10.1108/aa-05-2015-040 · Cited by 69
A business intelligence framework for sustainability information management in higher education
Scholtz, B. M., Calitz, A. P., & Haupt, R. (2018) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe-06-2016-0118 · Cited by 68
Children's emotions and quality of products in participatory game design
Gennari, R., Melonio, A., Raccanello, D., Brondino, M., Dodero, G., Pasini, M., & Torello, S. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.01.006 · Cited by 65
Affective appraisal of 3D land use visualization
van Lammeren, R. J. A., Houtkamp, J. M., Colijn, S., Hilferink, M., & Bouwman, A. (2010) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.001 · Cited by 59
Improving Web Navigation Usability by Comparing Actual and Anticipated Usage
Geng, R., & Tian, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2014.2363125 · Cited by 57
Usability in agile software development: A tertiary study
Curcio, K., Santana, R., Reinehr, S., & Malucelli, A. (2019) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2018.12.003 · Cited by 55
Measuring Voice UX Quantitatively: A Rapid Review
Seaborn, K., & Urakami, J. (2021) · Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451712 · Cited by 55
Can MOOCs empower people to critically think about climate change? A learning outcome based comparison of two MOOCs
Otto, D., Caeiro, S., Nicolau, P. B., Disterheft, A., Teixeira, A. M., Becker, S., Bollmann, A., & Sander, K. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.190 · Cited by 52
A virtual reality approach for usability assessment: case study on a wheelchair-mounted robot manipulator
Gironimo, G. D., Matrone, G., Tarallo, A., Trotta, M., & Lanzotti, A. (2012) · Engineering With Computers · doi:10.1007/s00366-012-0274-x · Cited by 51
Systematic guidance on usability methods in user-centered software development
Pérez, L. C., & Macías, J. A. (2018) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.01.010 · Cited by 51
A novel engagement of suicidality in the emergency department: Virtual Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality
Dimeff, L. A., Jobes, D. A., Chalker, S. A., Piehl, B. M., Duvivier, L. L., Lok, B. C., Zalake, M. S., Chung, J., & Koerner, K. (2020) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.05.005 · Cited by 49
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Multiple Versions of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Matrix App for Well-Being
Krafft, J., Potts, S., Schoendorff, B., & Levin, M. E. (2019) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445517748561 · Cited by 45
Feasibility of an acceptance and commitment therapy adjunctive web-based program for counseling centers.
Levin, M. E., Pistorello, J., Hayes, S. C., Seeley, J. R., & Levin, C. (2015) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000083 · Cited by 47
Quantitative analysis in a heuristic evaluation experiment
González, M., Masip, L., Granollers, A., & Oliva, M. (2009) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.027 · Cited by 46
A User-Centered Design Approach to Self-Service Ticket Vending Machines
Siebenhandl, K., Schreder, G., Smuc, M., Mayr, E., & Nagl, M. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2013.2257213 · Cited by 45
Usability testing of multimodal feedback interface and simulated collision-avoidance power wheelchair for long-term-care home residents with cognitive impairments
Wang, R. H., Mihailidis, A., Dutta, T., & Fernie, G. R. (2011) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2010.08.0147 · Cited by 44
Adoption of Project Management Practices in Public Organizations
Fitsilis, P., & Chalatsis, T. (2014) · iBusiness · doi:10.4236/ib.2014.63014 · Cited by 43
Development of a Fully Automated, Web-Based, Tailored Intervention Promoting Regular Physical Activity Among Insufficiently Active Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Integrating the I-Change Model, Self-Determination Theory, and Motivational Interviewing Components
Moreau, M., Gagnon, M.-P., & Boudreau, F. (2015) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.4099 · Cited by 41
Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Embedded On-line Shopping System
Wang, C., Chiang, Y.-C., & Wang, M.-J. (2015) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.766 · Cited by 41
A Quantitative Approach for Evaluating the Quality of Experience of Smart-Wearables From the Quality of Data and Quality of Information: An End User Perspective
Pal, D., Vanijja, V., Arpnikanondt, C., Zhang, X., & Papasratorn, B. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2917061 · Cited by 39
Empirical Evaluations of Interactive Systems in Cultural Heritage
Koutsabasis, P. (2017) · International Journal of Computational Methods in Heritage Science · doi:10.4018/ijcmhs.2017010107 · Cited by 39
The acceptance and commitment therapy matrix mobile app: A pilot randomized trial on health behaviors
Levin, M. E., Pierce, B., & Schoendorff, B. (2017) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.05.003 · Cited by 39
Supporting user-perceived usability benchmarking through a developed quantitative metric
Veral, R., & Macías, J. A. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.012 · Cited by 38
A framework for evaluating academic website's quality from students' perspective
Mebrate, T. (2010) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · Cited by 37
Gamified probes for cooperative learning: a case study
Gennari, R., Melonio, A., & Torello, S. (2016) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-016-3543-7 · Cited by 44
Quality-of-Experience perception for video streaming services: Preliminary subjective and objective results
Laghari, K. U. R., Issa, O., Speranza, F., & Falk, T. H. (2012) · Cited by 36
A Pilot Study on Usability Analysis of Emergency Department Information System by Nurses
Shapiro, J. S., Genes, N. G., Aguilar, M. V., Mohrer, D., Baumlin, K. M., Belden, J. L., & Kim, M. S. (2012) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2011-11-ra-0065 · Cited by 36
Diagnosis of major cancer resection specimens with virtual slides: impact of a novel digital pathology workstation
Randell, R., Ruddle, R. A., Thomas, R. G., Mello-Thoms, C. R., & Treanor, D. E. (2014) · Human Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2014.06.017 · Cited by 34
Using obstructed theatre with child designers to convey requirements
Read, J. C., Fitton, D., & Mazzone, E. (2010) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1753846.1754103 · Cited by 32
To intervene or not to intervene: An investigation of three think-aloud protocols in usability testing
Alhadreti, O., & Mayhew, P. J. (2017) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 32
v-Glove: A 3D Virtual Touch Interface
Rodrigues, P. G., Raposo, A. B., & Soares, L. P. (2011) · Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR) · doi:10.1109/svr.2011.21 · Cited by 32
Determining differences in user performance between expert and novice primary care doctors when using an electronic health record (EHR)
Clarke, M. A., Belden, J. L., & Kim, M. S. (2014) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12277 · Cited by 30
Automotive UX design and data-driven development: Narrowing the gap to support practitioners
Ebel, P., Orlovska, J., Hünemeyer, S., Wickman, C., Vogelsang, A., & Söderberg, R. C. (2021) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2021.100455 · Cited by 30
Formalising and evaluating Cultural User Experience
Konstantakis, M., Michalakis, K., Aliprantis, J., Kalatha, E., & Caridakis, G. (2017) · International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP) · doi:10.1109/smap.2017.8022675 · Cited by 30
Improving the Measurement of Older Adults’ Mobile Device Proficiency: Results and Implications from a Study of Older Adult Smartphone Users
Petrovcic, A., Boot, W. R., Burnik, T., & Dolnicar, V. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2947765 · Cited by 28
Interactive learning in operations management higher education
Arenas‐Márquez, F. J., Machuca, J. A. D., & Medina‐López, C. (2012) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571211284160 · Cited by 29
Using Card Sorts for Understanding Website Information Architectures: Technological, Methodological and Cultural Issues
Petrie, H., Power, C., Cairns, P. A., & Şeneler, Ç. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_26 · Cited by 29
Understanding the Position of Information Professionals with regards to Linked Data
McKenna, L., Debruyne, C., & O’Sullivan, D. (2018) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1145/3197026.3197041 · Cited by 28
Conceptual Design of Discrete-Event Systems Using Templates
Grigorov, L., Butler, B. E., Cury, J. E. R., & Rudie, K. (2010) · Discrete Event Dynamic Systems · doi:10.1007/s10626-010-0089-0 · Cited by 27
How to develop serious games for social and cognitive competence of children with learning difficulties
Sik‐Lányi, C., Shirmohammmadi, S., Guzsvinecz, T., Aberšek, B., Szücs, V., Isacker, K. V., Lazarov, A., Grudeva, P., & Boru, B. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications · doi:10.1109/coginfocom.2017.8268264 · Cited by 27
Making Energy Savings Easier: Usability Metrics for Thermostats
Perry, D., Pritoni, M., Aragón, C., Meier, A., & Peffer, T. E. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 27
Performance-Based Usability Testing: Metrics That Have the Greatest Impact for Improving a System’s Usability
Bailey, R. W., Wolfson, C. A., Nall, J., & Koyani, S. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_1 · Cited by 25
Interaction design studio learning in virtual worlds
Vosinakis, S., & Koutsabasis, P. (2013) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-013-0221-1 · Cited by 25
Monitoring Systems for Checking Websites on Accessibility
Burkard, A., Zimmermann, G., & Schwarzer, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2021.628770 · Cited by 24
On the usability assessment of the graphical user interface related to a digital pattern software tool
Patalano, S., Lanzotti, A., Giudice, D. M. D., Vitolo, F., & Gerbino, S. (2015) · International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) · doi:10.1007/s12008-015-0287-y · Cited by 24
User interface redesign of e-commerce platform mobile application (Kudo) through user experience evaluation to increase user attraction
Muslim, E., Moch, B. N., Tetelepta, Y. W., Utami, F. F., & Indriyani, D. (2019) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/508/1/012113 · Cited by 23
A user centered design approach for patient interfaces to a diabetes IT platform
Fico, G., Fioravanti, A., Arredondo, M. T., Leuteritz, J., Guillen, A., & Duarte, F. (2011) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6090274 · Cited by 25
A set of prescribed activities for enhancing requirements engineering in the development of usable e-Government applications
Sánchez, E., & Macías, J. A. (2017) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-017-0282-x · Cited by 23
Feasibility, Efficacy, and Efficiency of eHealth-Supported Pediatric Asthma Care: Six-Month Quasi-Experimental Single-Arm Pretest-Posttest Study
van der Kamp, M., Reimering Hartgerink, P., Driessen, J., Thio, B., Hermens, H., & Tabak, M. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/24634 · Cited by 19
Are two pairs of eyes better than one? A comparison of concurrent think-aloud and co-participation methods in usability testing
Mayhew, P., & Alhadreti, O. (2018) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 22
How can usability contribute to user experience?
Moczarny, I. M., de Villiers, R., & van Biljon, J. A. (2012) · South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists · doi:10.1145/2389836.2389862 · Cited by 21
Investigating the uptake of educational systems by academics using the technology to performance chain model
Harrati, N., Bouchrika, I., & Mahfouf, Z. (2017) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-01-2017-0029 · Cited by 22
How natural is a natural interface? An evaluation procedure based on action breakdowns
Gamberini, L., Spagnolli, A., Prontu, L., Furlan, S., Martino, F., Solaz, B. R., Alcañíz, M., & Lozano, J. A. (2011) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0476-z · Cited by 20
Limits of Kansei - Kansei Unlimited
Bongard-Blanchy, K., Bouchard, C., & Aoussat, A. (2013) · International Journal of Affective Engineering · doi:10.5057/ijae.12.145 · Cited by 20
A Self-Applied Multi-Component Psychological Online Intervention Based on UX, for the Prevention of Complicated Grief Disorder in the Mexican Population During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Protocol of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Dominguez-Rodriguez, A., Martínez-Luna, S. C., Hernández Jiménez, M. J., De La Rosa-Gómez, A., Arenas-Landgrave, P., Esquivel Santoveña, E. E., Arzola-Sánchez, C., Alvarez Silva, J., Solis Nicolas, A. M., Colmenero Guadián, A. M., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644782 · Cited by 18
Social design feedback: evaluations with users in online ad-hoc groups
Følstad, A., Hornbæk, K., & Ulleberg, P. (2013) · Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences · doi:10.1186/2192-1962-3-18 · Cited by 19
Cognitive Computing: Where Big Data Is Driving Us
Appel, A. P., Candello, H. C. D. S. P., & Gandour, F. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49340-4_24 · Cited by 19
Human‐computer interaction: the missing piece of the records management puzzle?
Bailey, S., & Vidyarthi, J. (2010) · Records Management Journal · doi:10.1108/09565691011095300 · Cited by 19
Affective appraisal of virtual environments
Houtkamp, J. M. (2012) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 19

Venue: Elsevier eBooks
Publisher: Elsevier
Published: 2008
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-373558-4.x0001-5
OpenAlex: W2548786785
Cited by: 287
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
FWCI: 13.17
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords: user experience, user experience evaluation, usability evaluation, user-centered design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Measuring the User Experience

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks