Cited by 19Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology Studies

MIGRATION CHARACTERISTICS OF COHO SALMON (ONCORHYNCHUS KISUTCH) SMOLTS IN THE COLUMBIA RIVER AND ITS ESTUARY

Durkin, Joseph T.·1982·Estuarine Comparisons

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-404070-0.50027-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From 1966 to 1983, an extensive beach- and purse-seining effort documented the abundance, distribution, migration patterns, and postrelease survival of wild and hatchery-reared salmon and steelhead, including subyearling Chinook salmon.

    “From 1966 to 1983, an extensive beach-and purse-seining effort documented the abundance, distribution, migration patterns, and postrelease survival of wild and hatchery-reared salmon and steelhead, including subyearling Chinook salmon”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Durkin, J. T.
Affiliations
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
Corresponding author
Durkin, Joseph T.
Venue
Estuarine Comparisons
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1982
Pages
365-376
OpenAlex
W22289342
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
coho salmon, smolt migration, Columbia River, Columbia River estuary, hatchery smolts, diel migration, prey use, Amphipoda, insects, predation, fish tagging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review