Cited by 99Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology Studies

LIFE HISTORY OF FALL-RUN JUVENILE CHINOOK SALMON, ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA, IN THE SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN ESTUARY, CALIFORNIA

Kjelson, Martin A., Raquel, Paul F., Fisher, Frank W.·1982·Estuarine Comparisons

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-404070-0.50029-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kjelson, M. A., Raquel, P. F., & Fisher, F. W.
Affiliations
  • United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US)
  • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
Venue
Estuarine Comparisons
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1982
Pages
393-411
OpenAlex
W153813897
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.77
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • California Department of Fish and Game
  • Department of Water Resources
  • California State Water Resources Control Board
  • Bureau of Reclamation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
fall-run Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, smolt migration, smolt survival, water temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review