The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Frame Problem in the Situation Calculus: A Simple Solution (Sometimes) and a Completeness Result for Goal Regression
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
GOLOG: A logic programming language for dynamic domains
Levesque, H. J., Reiter, R., Lespérance, Y., Lin, F., & Scherl, R. B. (1997) · The Journal of Logic Programming · doi:10.1016/s0743-1066(96)00121-5 · Cited by 1,041
Self-citationRepresenting action and change by logic programs
Gelfond, M., & Lifschitz, V. (1993) · The Journal of Logic Programming · doi:10.1016/0743-1066(93)90035-f · Cited by 507
ConGolog, a concurrent programming language based on the situation calculus
De Giacomo, G., Lespérance, Y., & Levesque, H. J. (2000) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(00)00031-x · Cited by 494
BI as an assertion language for mutable data structures
Ishtiaq, S., & O'Hearn, P. W. (2011) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/1988042.1988050 · Cited by 489
Giunchiglia, E., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V., McCain, N., & Turner, H. (2004) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2002.12.001 · Cited by 454
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Frame Problem in the Situation Calculus: A Simple Solution (Sometimes) and a Completeness Result for Goal Regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/b978-0-12-450010-5.50026-8
- The paper
- Reiter, R. (1991). The Frame Problem in the Situation Calculus: A Simple Solution (Sometimes) and a Completeness Result for Goal Regression. Artificial and Mathematical Theory of Computation. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-450010-5.50026-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
