The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonmonotonic causal theories
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving
Fikes, R. E., & Nilsson, N. J. (1971) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(71)90010-5 · Cited by 4,882
Reiter, R. (1980) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4 · Cited by 3,892
Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence
McCarthy, J., & Hayes, P. J. (1981) · Readings in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/b978-0-934613-03-3.50033-7 · Cited by 3,279
Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases
Gelfond, M., & Lifschitz, V. (1991) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/bf03037169 · Cited by 2,259
Self-citationCircumscription—A form of non-monotonic reasoning
McCarthy, J. (1980) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(80)90011-9 · Cited by 2,017
Clark, K. L. (1978) · Logic and Data Bases · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-3384-5_11 · Cited by 2,000
A logic-based calculus of events
Kowalski, R., & Sergot, M. (1986) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/bf03037383 · Cited by 1,690
Applications of circumscription to formalizing common-sense knowledge
McCarthy, J. (1986) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(86)90032-9 · Cited by 1,114
McCarthy, J. (1960) · Cited by 931
Logic programs with stable model semantics as a constraint programming paradigm
Niemelä, I. (1999) · Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1023/a:1018930122475 · Cited by 834
Cited by
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2007) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001 · Cited by 803
Logic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: a systematic literature review
Calegari, R., Ciatto, G., Mascardi, V., & Omicini, A. (2021) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-020-09478-3 · Cited by 117
“Table 4 Main technologies excluded from the survey, along with the motivation spanning between (i) “general purpose”, (ii) “no logic”, (iii) “technology not found” Motivation for exclusion Technology General purpose 4QL [243], CCALC [163], CDF-Rules [164], Clingo [292], DR-Prolog [37], Inter4QL [199], InterProlog [62]…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Giunchiglia, E., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V., McCain, N., & Turner, H.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 49-104
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072046078
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 34.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonmonotonic causal theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.artint.2002.12.001
- The paper
- Giunchiglia, E., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V., McCain, N., & Turner, H. (2004). Nonmonotonic causal theories. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2002.12.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
