Retrieval-Based Learning
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The benefits of retrieval practice are thought to occur via an episodic context account.
“The benefits of retrieval practice are thought to occur via an episodic context account.”
From Does Retrieval Practice Protect Memory Against Stress? A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Karpicke et al., 2014
Under the episodic context account, contextual cues become bound to memory traces and are reinstated each time an item is retrieved, thereby strengthening the memory traces learned with each retrieval.
“Under the episodic context account, contextual cues become bound to memory traces and are reinstated each time an item is retrieved from memory, thereby strengthening the memory traces learned with each retrieval (Karpicke et al., 2014; Karpicke, 2017).”
From Does Retrieval Practice Protect Memory Against Stress? A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Karpicke et al., 2014
The context-dependent explanation of retrieval practice holds that repeated binding of contextual cues to the memory trace strengthens memory and makes it easier to access, thereby potentially making it less vulnerable to stress.
“This also aligns with the context-dependent explanation of retrieval practice, where the repeated binding of contextual cues to the memory trace strengthens the memory and makes it easier to access, thereby potentially making it less vulnerable to the detrimental effects of stress (Karpicke et al., 2014; Karpicke, 2017).”
From Does Retrieval Practice Protect Memory Against Stress? A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Karpicke et al., 2014
One criticism of the Retrieval Effort Hypothesis is that it is a purely descriptive account and fails to explain reasons why an increase in effort may produce memory benefits.
“Indeed, one criticism of the REH is that it is a purely descriptive account (Karpicke et al., 2014) and fails to explain reasons why an increase in effort may produce memory benefits.”
From Does difficulty moderate learning? A comparative analysis of the desirable difficulties framework and cognitive load theory (2025) · cites this paper as Karpicke et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 125 · Cited by 185
- Authors
- Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karpicke, Jeffrey D.
- Venue
- Psychology of Learning and Motivation
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 237-284
- ISSN
- 0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4211254980
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 20.17
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- retrieval practice, long-term retention, context reinstatement, context updating, memory consolidation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review