Cited by 185Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Retrieval-Based Learning

Karpicke, Jeffrey D., Lehman, Melissa, Aue, William R.·2014·Psychology of Learning and Motivation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-800283-4.00007-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The benefits of retrieval practice are thought to occur via an episodic context account.

    “The benefits of retrieval practice are thought to occur via an episodic context account.”

    From Does Retrieval Practice Protect Memory Against Stress? A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Karpicke et al., 2014

  • Under the episodic context account, contextual cues become bound to memory traces and are reinstated each time an item is retrieved, thereby strengthening the memory traces learned with each retrieval.

    “Under the episodic context account, contextual cues become bound to memory traces and are reinstated each time an item is retrieved from memory, thereby strengthening the memory traces learned with each retrieval (Karpicke et al., 2014; Karpicke, 2017).”

    From Does Retrieval Practice Protect Memory Against Stress? A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Karpicke et al., 2014

  • The context-dependent explanation of retrieval practice holds that repeated binding of contextual cues to the memory trace strengthens memory and makes it easier to access, thereby potentially making it less vulnerable to stress.

    “This also aligns with the context-dependent explanation of retrieval practice, where the repeated binding of contextual cues to the memory trace strengthens the memory and makes it easier to access, thereby potentially making it less vulnerable to the detrimental effects of stress (Karpicke et al., 2014; Karpicke, 2017).”

    From Does Retrieval Practice Protect Memory Against Stress? A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Karpicke et al., 2014

  • One criticism of the Retrieval Effort Hypothesis is that it is a purely descriptive account and fails to explain reasons why an increase in effort may produce memory benefits.

    “Indeed, one criticism of the REH is that it is a purely descriptive account (Karpicke et al., 2014) and fails to explain reasons why an increase in effort may produce memory benefits.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 125 · Cited by 185

Authors
Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Karpicke, Jeffrey D.
Venue
Psychology of Learning and Motivation
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2014
Pages
237-284
ISSN
0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211254980
Cited by
185
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6
FWCI
20.17
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
retrieval practice, long-term retention, context reinstatement, context updating, memory consolidation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review