Industrial Waste Recovery
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The maximum CO2 uptake for CRHA-Li4SiO4 was around 6.92 mmol/g at 680 °C and atmospheric pressure.
“They reported the maximum CO 2 uptake around 6.92 mmol.g -1 at 680 ᵒC and atmospheric pressure for CRHA--Li 4 SiO 4 .”
From Biomass/Biochar carbon materials for CO2 capture and sequestration by cyclic adsorption processes: A review and prospects for future directions (2022) · cites this paper as [258]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Karimi, M., Shirzad, M., Silva, J. A. C., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2022) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101890 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rabelo, S. C., da Costa, A. C., & Vaz Rossel, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (BR)
- Venue
- Sugarcane
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2015
- Pages
- 365-381
- OpenAlex
- W2494644448
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sugarcane (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Keywords
- sugarcane bagasse, sugarcane straw, biofuels, animal feed, yeast, molasses, vinasse, filter cake, carbon dioxide, industrial waste valorization, sustainable processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
