Cited by 37Animal testing and alternativesPharmaceutical studies and practicesImmunotoxicology and immune responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preclinical Development of Nononcogenic Drugs (Small and Large Molecules)

Colerangle, J.B.·2017·A Comprehensive Guide to Toxicology in Nonclinical Drug Development

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-803620-4.00025-6

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

4 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Colerangle, J. B.
Corresponding author
Colerangle, J.B.
Venue
A Comprehensive Guide to Toxicology in Nonclinical Drug Development
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2017
Pages
659-683
OpenAlex
W2488067649
Cited by
37
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
preclinical drug development, biopharmaceuticals, pharmaceuticals, lead candidate selection, formulation development, route of administration, pharmacokinetics, toxicity prediction, animal species selection, epitope expression, therapeutic index, good laboratory practice, ICH guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review