Cited by 7Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Vision and Imaging

An Efficient Framework for Object Tracking in Video Surveillance

Mohanapriya, D., Mahesh, K.·2020·The Cognitive Approach in Cloud Computing and Internet of Things Technologies for Surveillance Tracking Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-816385-6.00005-2

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohanapriya, D., & Mahesh, K.
Affiliations
Alagappa University (IN)
Venue
The Cognitive Approach in Cloud Computing and Internet of Things Technologies for Surveillance Tracking Systems
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2020
Pages
65-74
OpenAlex
W3011623526
Cited by
7
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.87
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
object tracking, video surveillance, shadow removal, visual object tracking, tracking accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review