Cited by 2Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesReliability and Agreement in MeasurementStatistical Methods and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The fallacy of forensic age estimation from morphometric quantifications of the pubic symphysis

Bookstein, Fred L., Bravo Morante, Guillermo·2021·Remodeling Forensic Skeletal Age

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-824370-1.00009-2

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bravo Morante, 2020, Correlation of the human pubic symphysis surface with age-at-death: a hundred years of estimation methods reconsidered, Forensic Sci. Int.
  2. Kagan, 1973, Characterization problems in mathematical, Statistics

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Bookstein, F. L., & Bravo Morante, G.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Remodeling Forensic Skeletal Age
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2021
Pages
199-213
OpenAlex
W3157755805
Cited by
2
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.90
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
forensic age estimation, pubic symphysis, geometric morphometrics, inverse regression, least squares regression, Rasch scaling, developmental psychology, aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review