CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Antibiotic Use and ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review of Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Food-Borne Bacteria and Pathogenic Bacteria Related to National and International Resistance Monitoring Programs in Livestock

de Jong, A., Temmerman, R., Sweeney, M.T., El Garch, F.·2025·Antimicrobial Food Packaging
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-323-90747-7.00010-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-323-90747-7.00010-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. Abraham, 2020, Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli among Australian chickens in the absence of fluoroquinolone use, Appl. Environm. Microbiol., 86, 10.1128/AEM.02765-19 · DOI
  2. Bartram, 2016, Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin and tildipirosin for the treatment of experimental Mycoplasma bovis infection in calves, Vet. Med. Sci., 2, 170, 10.1002/vms3.31 · DOI
  3. Bengtsson, 2009, Antimicrobial susceptibility of udder pathogens from cases of acute clinical mastitis in dairy cows, Vet. Microbiol., 136, 142, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.10.024 · DOI
  4. Bergholz, 2024, Comment on “Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycoplasma bovis from the upper and lower respiratory tracts of healthy feedlot cattle and those diagnosed with bovine respiratory disease”, Vet. Microbiol., 290, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.109998 · DOI
  5. Bywater, 2004, A European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility among zoonotic and commensal bacteria isolated from food-producing animals, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 54, 744, 10.1093/jac/dkh422 · DOI
  6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2024b. M100-S34 performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing 2024. 34th Edition, Wayne, PA, USA.
  7. Dai, 2020, New and alternative strategies for the prevention, control, and treatment of antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter, Transl. Res., 223, 76, 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.009 · DOI
  8. de Jong, 2009, A pan-European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility towards human-use antimicrobial drugs among zoonotic and commensal enteric bacteria isolated from healthy food-producing animals, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 63, 733, 10.1093/jac/dkp012 · DOI
  9. de Jong, 2011, Fluoroquinolone resistance of Escherichia coli and Salmonella from healthy livestock and poultry in the EU, J. Appl. Microbiol., 112, 239, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05193.x · DOI
  10. de Jong, 2012, Pan-European monitoring of susceptibility to human-use antimicrobial agents in enteric bacteria isolated from healthy food producing animals, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 67, 638, 10.1093/jac/dkr539 · DOI
  11. de Jong, 2013, Pan-European resistance monitoring programmes encompassing food-borne bacteria and target pathogens of food-producing and companion animals, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 41, 403, 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.11.004 · DOI · Paper page
  12. de Jong, 2016, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of food-borne bacteria related to national and international resistance monitoring programmes, Antimicrob. Food Packag., 117, 10.1016/B978-0-12-800723-5.00009-7 · DOI
  13. de Jong, 2017, Executive Animal Health Study Center (CEESA): paneuropäische Resistenzmonitoring-Programme zu durch Lebensmittel übertragenen Bakterien sowie Pathogenen bei Nutz- und Hobbytieren, Der Praktische Tierarzt, 98, 1069
  14. de Jong, 2018, Characterization of quinolone resistance mechanisms in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from companion animals in Europe (ComPath II study), Vet. Microbiol., 216, 159, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.002 · DOI
  15. de Jong, 2019, Antimicrobial resistance monitoring in commensal enterococci from healthy cattle, pigs and chickens across Europe during 2004–14 (EASSA study), J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 74, 921, 10.1093/jac/dky537 · DOI
  16. de Jong, 2021, Antimicrobial susceptibility monitoring of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae isolated from seven European countries during 2015–2016, Vet. Microbiol., 253, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108973 · DOI
  17. de Jong, 2022, European-wide antimicrobial resistance monitoring in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from healthy food animals between 2004 and 2018, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 77, 3301, 10.1093/jac/dkac318 · DOI
  18. de Jong, 2023, Antimicrobial susceptibility among respiratory tract pathogens isolated from diseased cattle and pigs from different parts of Europe, J. Appl. Microbiol., 134, 8
  19. Dorado-Garcia, 2016, Quantitative assessment of antimicrobial resistance in livestock during the course of a nationwide antmicrobial use reduction in the Netherlands, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 71, 3607, 10.1093/jac/dkw308 · DOI
  20. 2008, Report from the task force on zoonoses data collection including guidance for harmonized monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. from food animals, EFSA J., 141, 1
  21. 2012, Technical specifications for the analysis and reporting of data on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the European Union Summary Report, EFSA J., 10, 2587, 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2587 · DOI
  22. 2012, Technical specifications on the harmonised monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella, Campylobacter and indicator Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. bacteria transmitted through food, EFSA J., 10, 2742
  23. ECDC, EFSA, EMA, 2024. Fourth joint inter-agency report on integrated analysis of antimicrobial agent consumption and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food-producing animals in the EU/EEA, JIACRA IV-2019–2021, pp. 1–172.
  24. 2023, The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2020/2021, EFSA J., 21, 7867
  25. El Garch, 2016, Monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility of respiratory tract pathogens isolated from diseased cattle and pigs across Europe, 2009–2012: VetPath results, Vet. Microbiol., 194, 11, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.04.009 · DOI
  26. El Garch, 2020, Antimicrobial susceptibility of nine udder pathogens recovered from bovine clinical mastitis milk in Europe 2015–2016: VetPath results, Vet. Microbiol., 245, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108644 · DOI
  27. Ewers, 2021, Genomic diversity and virulence potential of ESBL- and AmpC-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains from healthy food animals across Europe, Front. Microbiol., 12, 626774, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.626774 · DOI
  28. Gautier-Bouchardon, 2018, Antimicrobial resistance in Mycoplasma spp, Microbiol. Spectr., 6, 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0030-2018 · DOI
  29. Gautier-Bouchardon, A.V., Jay Klose, S.M., Heuvelink, A., Ysnayansky, I., Gyuranecz, M., et al., 2023. MyMIC: a network for standardization of diagnostics, antimicrobial susceptibility testing and clinical interpretation in animal mycoplasmas. 9th Symposium on Antimicrobial Resistance in Animals and the Environment (ARAE), p. 80, poster P72, July 3-5 2023, Tours, France.
  30. Guerrant, 2001, Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea, Clin. Infect. Dis., 32, 331, 10.1086/318514 · DOI
  31. Gütgemann, 2023, Toward a method for harmonized susceptibility testing of Mycoplasma bovis by broth microdilution, J. Clin. Microbiol., 61, 8
  32. Hannan, 2000, Guidelines and recommendations for antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing against veterinary mycoplasma species, Vet. Res., 31, 373, 10.1051/vetres:2000100 · DOI
  33. Hendriksen, 2008, Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens from cattle in different European countries: 2002–2004: the ARBAO-II study, Acta Vet. Scand., 50, 28, 10.1186/1751-0147-50-28 · DOI
  34. Jensen, 2024, Estimation of epidemiological cut-off values for eight antibiotics used for treatment of bovine mastitis caused by Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. dysgalactiae, Vet. Microbiol., 290, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.109994 · DOI
  35. Kadlec, 2018, Antimicrobial Resistance in Bordetella bronchiseptica, Microbiol. Spectr., 6, 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0024-2017 · DOI
  36. Kahlmeter, 2003, European harmonization of MIC breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 52, 145, 10.1093/jac/dkg312 · DOI
  37. Kahlmeter, 2022, How to: ECOFFs-the way, the how, and the don’ts of EUCAST epidemiological cutoff values, Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 28, 952, 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.024 · DOI
  38. Kaspar, H., Roemer, A., Kluge, M., Fiedler, S., Karaalp, A.-K., Ballhausen, B., et al., 2023. Resistances to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones in veterinary medicine in livestock. Results of the German National Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring. 9th Symposium on Antimicrobial Resistance in Animals and the Environment (ARAE), p. 80, poster P29, July 3–5 2023, Tours, France.
  39. Kempf, 2017, Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: prevalence and antimicrobial resistance, Front. Microbiol., 8, 955, 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 · DOI
  40. Klein, 2019, New antimicrobial susceptibility data from monitoring of Mycoplasma bovis isolated in Europe, Vet. Microbiol., 238, 108432, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108432 · DOI
  41. Kronvall, 2010, Normalized resistance interpretation as a tool for establishing epidemiological MIC susceptibility breakpoints, J. Clin. Microbiol., 48, 4445, 10.1128/JCM.01101-10 · DOI
  42. Livermore, 2007, CTX-M: changing the face of ESBLs in Europe, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 59, 165, 10.1093/jac/dkl483 · DOI
  43. Mader, 2021, Building the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance network in veterinary medicine (EARS-Vet), Eurosurveill, 26, 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.4.2001359 · DOI
  44. Mader, 2022, Defining the scope of the European antimicrobial resistance surveillance network in veterinary medicine (EARS-Vet): a bottom-up and one health approach, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 10, 1093
  45. Madec, 2017, Extended-spectrum β-lactamase/AmpC- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in animals: a threat for humans?, Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 23, 826, 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.01.013 · DOI
  46. Maes, 2018, Update on Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infections in pigs: knowledge gaps for improved disease control, Transbound. Emerg. Dis., 65, 110, 10.1111/tbed.12677 · DOI
  47. Martak, 2022, Populations of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are different in human-polluted environment and food items: a multicentre European study, Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 28, e7
  48. Martak, 2024, Environment, animals, and food as reservoirs of antibiotic-resistant bacteria for humans: one health or more?, Infect. Dis. Now., 54, 104895, 10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104895 · DOI
  49. McDermott, 2016, Whole-genome sequencing for detecting antimicrobial resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 60, 5515, 10.1128/AAC.01030-16 · DOI
  50. Medrano, 2024, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 412, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110541 · DOI
  51. Melchner, 2021, Antimicrobial resistance in isolates from cattle with bovine respiratory disease in Bavaria, Germany, Antibiotics, 10, 1538, 10.3390/antibiotics10121538 · DOI
  52. Mouton, 2018, MIC-based dose adjustment: facts and fables, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 73, 564, 10.1093/jac/dkx427 · DOI
  53. Moyaert, 2012, Antimicrobial susceptibility of zoonotic Salmonella enterica from cattle, pigs and poultry isolated in 8 European countries over a four year period (2002–2006) (EASSA program), Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 18, 308
  54. Moyaert, 2014, Antimicrobial resistance monitoring projects for zoonotic and indicator bacteria of animal origin: common aspects and differences between EASSA and EFSA, Vet. Microbiol., 171, 279, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.02.038 · DOI
  55. Office International des Epizooties, 2019. Harmonisation of national antimicrobial resistance surveillance and monitoring programmes Terrestrial Animal Health Code, Chapter 6.8.
  56. Ruegg, 2017, A 100-year review: mastitis detection, management and prevention, J. Dairy Sci., 100, 10381, 10.3168/jds.2017-13023 · DOI
  57. Sauget, 2023, Genome analysis of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella species recovered from healthy and diseased food-producing animals in Europe, PLoS ONE, 18, e0289829, 10.1371/journal.pone.0289829 · DOI
  58. Schrijver, R., Stijntjes, M., Rodriguez-Bano, J., Tacconelli, E., Babu Rajendran, N., Voss, A., 2018. Review of antimicrobial resistance surveillance programmes in livestock and their meat in Europe, with the focus on antimicrobial resistance patterns in humans. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 24, 577–590. · DOI
  59. Schwaber, 2007, Mortality and delay in effective therapy associated with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 60, 913, 10.1093/jac/dkm318 · DOI
  60. Schwarz, 2010, Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals, Vet. Microbiol., 141, 1, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.013 · DOI
  61. Silley, 2006, Antimicrobial breakpoints-an area for clarification, J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap., 29, 310, 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2006.00768_9.x · DOI
  62. Silley, 2011, Harmonisation of resistance monitoring programmes in veterinary medicine: an urgent need in the EU?, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 37, 504, 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.12.002 · DOI
  63. Silley, 2017, Prudent use and regulatory guidelines for veterinary antibiotics—politics or science?, J. Appl. Microbiol., 123, 1373, 10.1111/jam.13553 · DOI
  64. Simjee, S., Blackman Northwood, J., Knight, D.R., Shryock, T., de Jong, A., Willems, R.J.L., 2012. MLST typing of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis recovered from healthy pigs and chickens across Europe and sequence type comparisons with the international MLST database. 15th Intern. Congress on Infectious Diseases (ICID), Bangkok, Thailand. Poster 41.052. · DOI
  65. Simjee, 2008, Potential confusion regarding the term “resistance” in epidemiological surveys, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 61, 228, 10.1093/jac/dkm423 · DOI
  66. Sproston, 2018, Trends in fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter, Microb. Genomes., 4, e001198
  67. Sultana, 2023, Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycoplasma bovis from the upper and lower respiratory tracts of healthy feedlot cattle and those diagnosed with bovine respiratory disease, Vet. Microbiol., 285, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2023.109838 · DOI
  68. Sweeney, 2024, Antimicrobial susceptibility of mastitis pathogens isolated from North American dairy cattle, 2011–2022, Vet. Microbiol., 291, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110015 · DOI
  69. Sweeney, 2022, Antimicrobial susceptibility of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Pasteurella multocida, and Streptococcus suis isolated from diseased pigs in the United States and Canada, 2016 to 2020, J. Swine Health Prod., 30, 130, 10.54846/jshap/1282 · DOI
  70. Sweeney, 2018, Applying definitions for multidrug resistance, extensive drug resistance and pandrug resistance to clinically significant livestock and companion animal bacterial pathogens, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 73, 1460, 10.1093/jac/dky043 · DOI
  71. Teale, 2021, A proposed scheme for the monitoring of antibiotic resistance in veterinary pathogens of food animals in the UK, Vet. Rec., 189, 10.1002/vetr.201 · DOI
  72. Toutain, 2017, En route towards European clinical breakpoints for veterinary susceptibility testing: a position paper explaining the VetCAST approach, Front. Microbiol., 8, 2344, 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02344 · DOI
  73. Turnidge, 2007, Setting and revising antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 20, 391, 10.1128/CMR.00047-06 · DOI
  74. Vilaro, 2023, Susceptibility trends of swine respiratory pathogens from 2019 to 2022 to antimicrobials commonly used in Spain, Porcine Health Manag., 9, 47, 10.1186/s40813-023-00341-x · DOI
  75. Wassenaar, 2007, Re-analysis of the risks attributed to ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter jejuni infections, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 30, 195, 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.01.019 · DOI
  76. Wasyl, 2014, Prevalence and characterization of quinolone resistance mechanisms in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from slaughter animals in Poland, 2009–2012, Microb. Drug. Resist., 20, 544, 10.1089/mdr.2014.0061 · DOI
  77. Zouharová, M., Nedbalcová, K., 2019. Antimicrobial susceptibility of streptococci most frequently isolated from Czech dairy cows with mastitis. Poster P6, p.67. 8th Symposium on Antimicrobial Resistance in Animals and the Environment (ARAE), July 1–3, 2019, Tours, France.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
de Jong, A., Temmerman, R., Sweeney, M. T., & El Garch, F.
Affiliations
Zoetis (United States) (US)
ORCID
Venue
Antimicrobial Food Packaging
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2025
Pages
139-161
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-323-90747-7.00010-7
OpenAlex
W4408030647
Cited by
1
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial resistance surveillance, foodborne bacteria, livestock, clinical breakpoints, epidemiological cut-off values, interpretation criteria, method harmonization, zoonotic pathogens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review