Cited by 8Algal biology and biofuel productionAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthSeaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Food and feed from microalgae: A historical perspective to future directions

Jacob-Lopes, Eduardo, Zepka, Leila Queiroz·2023·Handbook of Food and Feed from Microalgae

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-323-99196-4.00001-2

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The microalgae-based food industry faces structural and economic challenges including high production costs, limited scalability of photobioreactors, variability in biomass composition depending on strain and cultivation conditions, and need for harmonized regulatory frameworks across regions.

    “Some of these challenges include high production costs in the cultivation and processing stages, the limited scalability of cultivation systems such as photobioreactors, the variability in biomass composition that largely depends on the strain and cultivation conditions, and the need for the implementation of harmonized regulatory frameworks across regions (Jacob-Lopes and Zepka, 2023; Kathuria et”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Jacob-Lopes and Zepka, 2023

  • Several microalgae species are validated and have GRAS status or equivalent, while another six species-including Haematococcus pluvialis, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Dunaliella sp., Nannochloropsis sp., Nitzschia sp., and Schizochytrium sp.-are considered safe, without reports of toxins contained.

    “cruentum, and Crypthecodinium cohnii are validated and have GRAS status or equivalent, while another six species–including Haematococcus pluvialis, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Dunaliella sp., Nannochloropsis sp., Nitzschia sp., and Schizochytrium sp. – are considered safe, without reports of toxins contained (Jacob-Lopes and Zepka, 2023).”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Jacob-Lopes and Zepka, 2023

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kabata, 2005, Studies on the analysis of cultivation conditions and constitutive monosaccharides, and function for food in Suizenjinori (Aphanothece sacrum (Sur.) Okada) indigenous to Japan, J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ., 24, 37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jacob-Lopes, E., & Zepka, L. Q.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
Venue
Handbook of Food and Feed from Microalgae
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2023
Pages
3-7
OpenAlex
W4381955331
Cited by
8
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
FWCI
5.83
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
Keywords
microalgae, microalgae feed, future perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review