Cited by 202Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Cognition and daytime functioning in sleep-related breathing disorders

Jackson, Melinda L., Howard, Mark E., Barnes, Maree·2011·Progress in Brain Research

Abstract

Sleep-related breathing disorders encompass a range of disorders in which abnormal ventilation occurs during sleep as a result of partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway, altered respiratory drive, abnormal chest wall movement, or respiratory muscle function. The most common of these is obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), occurring in both adults and children, and causing significant cognitive and daytime dysfunction and reduced quality of life. OSA patients experience repetitive brief cessation of breathing throughout the night, which causes intermittent hypoxemia (reductions in hemoglobin oxygen levels) and fragmented sleep patterns. These nocturnal events result in excessive daytime sleepiness, and changes in mood and cognition. Chronic excessive sleepiness during the day is a common symptom of sleep-related breathing disorders, which is assessed in sleep clinics both subjectively (questionnaire) and objectively (sleep latency tests). Mood changes are often reported by patients, including irritability, fatigue, depression, and anxiety. A wide range of cognitive deficits have been identified in untreated OSA patients, from attentional and vigilance, to memory and executive functions, and more complex tasks such as simulated driving. These changes are reflected in patient reports of difficulty in concentrating, increased forgetfulness, an inability to make decisions, and falling asleep at the wheel of a motor vehicle. These cognitive changes can also have significant…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-53817-8.00003-7

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, M. L., Howard, M. E., & Barnes, M.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University Spokane (US)
  • Austin Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Melinda L.
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2011
Volume
190
Pages
53-68
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1668612790
Cited by
202
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
66.09
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, sleep-disordered breathing, cognitive impairment, daytime functioning, excessive daytime sleepiness, mood disorders, attention and vigilance, memory, executive function, intermittent hypoxemia, sleep fragmentation, motor vehicle accidents, comorbidities, neuroimaging, quality of life
MeSH terms
Affect, Automobile Driving, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review