Cited by 11Catalysts for Methane ReformingThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesMunicipal Solid Waste Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Waste as a Source of Carbon for Methanol Production

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-63903-5.00004-2

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Biedermann, 2006, vol. 55
  2. Bomgardner, 2016, Renewables firms focus on cost squeeze, Chem. Eng. News, 94, 26

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Iaquaniello, G., Centi, G., Salladini, A., & Palo, E.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Defence (IT)
  • University of Messina (IT)
Venue
Methanol
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2018
Pages
95-111
OpenAlex
W2768803294
Cited by
11
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
methanol synthesis, high-temperature conversion, waste-to-energy, CO2 emissions, energy efficiency, natural gas comparison, greenhouse gas emissions, energy costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review