Cited by 578Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsChemistry and Chemical Engineering

The role of carbon capture and utilization, carbon capture and storage, and biomass to enable a net-zero-CO2 emissions chemical industry

Open access
Gabrielli, Paolo, Gazzani, Matteo, Mazzotti, Marco·2020·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

This contribution provides a conceptual analysis and a quantitative comparative assessment of three technology chains that enable a carbon neutral chemical industry in a net-zero-CO2 world. These are based (i) on the use of fossil fuels and current chemical processes and infrastructure coupled with carbon capture and storage (CCS route), (ii) on the use of captured CO2 as a feedstock together with “green” hydrogen in new chemical processes (CCU route), (iii) on the use of biomass grown and processed for the specific purpose of making chemicals (BIO route). All routes are feasible and have different pros and cons. Such pros and cons are first discussed through a qualitative comparison of the three routes for a generic chemical product, and are then quantitatively assessed for the specific case of methanol production. In this case, the CCU route results in an electricity consumption 10 to 25 times higher than that of the CCS and BIO routes (excluding the electricity required for heat production), mostly due to the electricity required to produce hydrogen. At the same time, the BIO route requires a land capacity about 40 and 400 times higher than that required by the CCU and CCS routes, respectively. Furthermore, when considering a net-positive-CO2 emissions world, the CO2 emissions of the CCU route grow about 8 to 10 times faster than that of the CCS and BIO routes. On the one hand, we identify key hurdles in all cases. These are (i) the availability, accessibility, and accepta…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06579

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atmospheric carbon capture via plant growth is more energy-efficient than atmospheric carbon capture and utilization via direct air capture, which might require 10-25 times more electricity.

    “Atmospheric carbon capture via plant growth is more energyefficient than atmospheric carbon capture and utilization via direct air capture, which might require 10-25 times more electricity (Gabrielli et al., 2020).”

    From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Gabrielli et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. IPCC, 2014, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 151
  2. IPCC, 2018, Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, 24
  3. Aresta, 2019, An Economy Based on Carbon Dioxide and Water, 10.1007/978-3-030-15868-2 · DOI
  4. SAPEA, Science Advice for Policy by European Academies, 2018, Novel carbon capture and utilisation technologies: research and climate aspects, 98

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabrielli, P., Gazzani, M., & Mazzotti, M.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Mazzotti, Marco
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2020-03-04
Volume
59
Issue
15
Pages
7033-7045
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W3009569863
Cited by
578
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 15
FWCI
32.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (691712)
  • Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (NA)
  • Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland (NA)
  • Bundesamt für Energie (NA)
  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (NA)
  • Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research, Efficiency in Industrial Processes (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Keywords
carbon capture and utilization, carbon capture and storage, biomass-to-liquids, net-zero CO2 emissions, chemical industry decarbonization, methanol synthesis, green hydrogen, CO2 storage sites, electricity demand, CO2 emissions, net-negative emissions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review