The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a Practical GOMS Model Methodology for User Interface Design
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Cited by
The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast
John, B. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1996) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/235833.236054 · Cited by 687
Self-citationMonitoring Working Memory Load during Computer-Based Tasks with EEG Pattern Recognition Methods
Gevins, A., Smith, M. E., Leong, H., McEvoy, L., Whitfield, S., Du, R., & Rush, G. (1998) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872098779480578 · Cited by 535
New theoretical approaches for human‐computer interaction
Rogers, Y. (2004) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.1440380103 · Cited by 386
Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: an integrated model approach
SALVUCCI, D. D. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2001.0472 · Cited by 195
User interface design for older adults
Morris, J. M. (1994) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/0953-5438(94)90009-4 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Kieras, D. E.
- Venue
- Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1988
- Pages
- 135-157
- OpenAlex
- W1553977197
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
