The Existing Conceptual Foundation and the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This finding contradicts the long-held view that the main channel of the CRE serves as a 'pipe' for fast-migrating juvenile salmon and that they neither feed nor grow as they move downstream.
“This finding contradicts the long-held view that the main channel of the CRE serves as a”
From Life in the Fast Lane: Feeding and Growth of Juvenile Steelhead and Chinook Salmon in <scp>Main‐Stem</scp> Habitats of the Columbia River Estuary (2022) · cites this paper as Lichatowich et al. 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weitkamp, L. A., Beckman, B. R., Van Doornik, D. M., Munguia, A., Hunsicker, M., & Journey, M. (2022) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1002/tafs.10376 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lichatowich, J. A., McConnaha, W. E., Liss, W. J., Stanford, J. A., & Williams, R. N.
- Venue
- Return to the River
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 29-49
- OpenAlex
- W2289793899
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Keywords
- salmon management, fisheries restoration, hydropower impacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
