The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles of Categorization
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Principle of Cognitive Economy states that a category system should provide maximum information with the least cognitive effort.”
From The role of pragmatic mechanisms in referential communication and categorization: An emergent communication model (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“It has been proposed that, due to cognitive constraints, both languages and category systems tend to find an optimal tradeoff between simplicity and informativeness [6,8,16–20].”
From The role of pragmatic mechanisms in referential communication and categorization: An emergent communication model (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“As predicted by Rosch et al. [19,20], the category system of a language can afford to be simpler when the meanings of categories are interpreted in context.”
From The role of pragmatic mechanisms in referential communication and categorization: An emergent communication model (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,289
The origins of intelligence in children.
Piaget, J. (1952) · doi:10.1037/11494-000 · Cited by 10,687
Tversky, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.4.327 · Cited by 7,414
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 · Cited by 5,933
Self-citationBasic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Self-citationCognitive representations of semantic categories.
Rosch, E. H. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192 · Cited by 4,993
Self-citationBattig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027577 · Cited by 2,571
Cognitive Development and Acquisition of Language
(1973) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-22101-5 · Cited by 2,231
Solso, R. L., & Chase, W. G. (1974) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421395 · Cited by 2,134
The Processing of Information and Structure
Royer, F. L., & Garner, W. R. (1974) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421985 · Cited by 2,130
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Garis, 1975, The Margaret Mead of Madison Avenue, Ms., 47
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 949
An Ecology of Social Categories
Pontikes, E., & Hannan, M. T. (2014) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v1.a20 · Cited by 47
Using the axis of elongation to align shapes: Developmental changes between 18 and 24months of age
Smith, L. B., Street, S., Jones, S. S., & James, K. H. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.009 · Cited by 45
Saaristo, P. (2015) · doi:10.14705/rpnet.2015.000296 · Cited by 49
The Practical Logic of Cognitive Systems
Gabbay, D. M., & Woods, J. (2003) · A practical logic of cognitive systems · doi:10.1016/s1874-5075(03)80003-7 · Cited by 44
Just Married: The Synergy between Feminist Criminology and the Tripartite Cybercrime Framework
Lazarus, S. I. (2019) · International Social Science Journal · doi:10.1111/issj.12201 · Cited by 50
Order Structure, Correspondence, and Shape Based Categories
Carlsson, S. (1999) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46805-6_5 · Cited by 44
Genre Innovation: Evolution, Emergence, or Something Else?
Miller, C. R. (2016) · The Journal of Media Innovations · doi:10.5617/jmi.v3i2.2432 · Cited by 47
9 Basic Levels in Artificial and Natural Categories: Are All Basic Levels Created Equal?
Lassaline, M. E., Wisniewski, E. J., & Medin, D. L. (1992) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61013-4 · Cited by 43
Dynamicity in Emotion Concepts
Wilson, P. (2012) · Peter Lang D eBooks · doi:10.3726/978-3-653-01466-2 · Cited by 42
Artificial grammar learning in pigeons
Herbranson, W. T., & Shimp, C. P. (2008) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/lb.36.2.116 · Cited by 41
Conceptualising the geographic world: the dimensions of negotiation in crowdsourced cartography
Ballatore, A., & Mooney, P. (2015) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1076825 · Cited by 40
Mutual learning of an object concept and language model based on MLDA and NPYLM
Nakamura, T., Nagai, T., Funakoshi, K., Nagasaka, S., Taniguchi, T., & Iwahashi, N. (2014) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2014.6942621 · Cited by 39
How Trainees Transfer What They Have Learned: Toward a Taxonomy of Use
Yelon, S. L., Ford, J. K., & Bhatia, S. (2014) · Performance Improvement Quarterly · doi:10.1002/piq.21172 · Cited by 39
Exploring the Influence of Contract Governance on Construction Dispute Negotiation
Cheung, S. O., Wong, W. K., Yiu, T. W., & Kwok, T. W. (2008) · Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice · doi:10.1061/(asce)1052-3928(2008)134:4(391 · Cited by 38
Quantum structure of negation and conjunction in human thought
Aerts, D., Sozzo, S., & Veloz, T. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01447 · Cited by 34
Des catégories d’odorants à la sémantique des odeurs
Dubois, D. S. (2006) · Terrain · doi:10.4000/terrain.4263 · Cited by 37
Fried, A. (2016) · Journal of Management Control · doi:10.1007/s00187-016-0240-7 · Cited by 36
Asada, A., & Ko, Y. J. (2019) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2018-0362 · Cited by 41
Neural mechanisms supporting the extraction of general knowledge across episodic memories
Sweegers, C. C. G., Takashima, A., Fernández, G., & Talamini, L. M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.063 · Cited by 36
Capturing clinical complexity: Towards a personality-oriented measure of psychopathy
Cooke, D., & Logan, C. (2015) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.04.004 · Cited by 40
Effect of explicit dimensional instruction on speech category learning
Chandrasekaran, B., Yi, H., Smayda, K., & Maddox, W. T. (2015) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0999-x · Cited by 35
Relating categorization to set summary statistics perception
Khayat, N., & Hochstein, S. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01792-7 · Cited by 35
Biologically Inspired Visual Model With Preliminary Cognition and Active Attention Adjustment
Qiao, H., Xi, X., Li, Y., Wu, W. L., & Li, F. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2014.2377196 · Cited by 34
Toward an Epistemic-Logical Theory of Categorization
Conradie, W., Frittella, S., Palmigiano, A., Piazzai, M., Tzimoulis, A., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017) · Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.4204/eptcs.251.12 · Cited by 34
Optimizing one-shot recognition with micro-set learning
Tang, K. D., Tappen, M. F., Sukthankar, R., & Lampert, C. H. (2010) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540053 · Cited by 34
Encyclopedic VQA: Visual questions about detailed properties of fine-grained categories
Mensink, T., Uijlings, J., Castrejón, L., Goel, A., Cadar, F., Zhou, H., Sha, F., Araújo, A. D. M., & Ferrari, V. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00289 · Cited by 61
Helping editors choose better seed sets for entity set expansion
Vyas, V., Pantel, P., & Crestan, E. (2009) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/1645953.1645984 · Cited by 33
Harwood, J., Joyce, N., Chen, C.-Y., Паолини, С., Xiang, J. Y., & Rubin, M. (2015) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650214565926 · Cited by 33
Cognitive LinguisticsPreprint
Janda, L. A. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1408069 · Cited by 33
Koschmann, A., & Isaac, M. S. (2018) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2018.08.001 · Cited by 33
The polysemy of the Spanish verb sentir: A behavioral profile analysis
Jansegers, M., Vanderschueren, C., & Enghels, R. (2015) · Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cog-2014-0055 · Cited by 31
An Evaluation of Constituency-Based Hyponymy Extraction from Privacy Policies
Evans, M. C., Bhatia, J., Wadkar, S., & Breaux, T. D. (2017) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re.2017.87 · Cited by 31
Wheeler, J. L., & Regian, J. W. (1999) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(99)00021-7 · Cited by 31
Research Note—Interbrand Variant Overlap: Impact on Brand Preference and Portfolio Profit
Aribarg, A., & Arora, N. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1060.0262 · Cited by 31
Murphy, G. L. (1993) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60144-9 · Cited by 31
Models of Language and Multiword Expressions
Kallens, P. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.781962 · Cited by 43
Culture and Durable Inequality
Valentino, L., & Vaisey, S. (2022) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-102739 · Cited by 29
Flandin, S., & Ria, L. (2014) · Activites · doi:10.4000/activites.970 · Cited by 36
Salient object parts and infants' acquisition of novel object words
Poulin‐Dubois, D., Graham, S. A., & Riddle, A. S. (1995) · First Language · doi:10.1177/014272379501504503 · Cited by 30
Steffens, N. K., Munt, K. A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/b94qs · Cited by 33
Asada, A., Ko, Y., & Jang, W. (2020) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2019-0055 · Cited by 26
Design and development of linked data from The National Map
Usery, E. L., & Varanka, D. E. (2012) · Semantic Web · doi:10.3233/sw-2011-0054 · Cited by 29
Gill, A. J., Vasalou, A., Papoutsi, C., & Joinson, A. (2011) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979421 · Cited by 31
Nichter, M. (1991) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_4.s265 · Cited by 29
A new perspective on "community" and its implications for computer-mediated communication systems
Bruckman, A. S. (2006) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1125451.1125579 · Cited by 29
Environmental Sound Perception: Metadescription and Modeling Based on Independent Primary Studies
Misdariis, N., Minard, A., Susini, P., Lemaître, G., McAdams, S. E., & Parizet, É. (2010) · EURASIP Journal on Audio Speech and Music Processing · doi:10.1155/2010/362013 · Cited by 28
Automated Extraction of Regulated Information Types Using Hyponymy Relations
Bhatia, J., Evans, M. C., Wadkar, S., & Breaux, T. D. (2016) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew.2016.018 · Cited by 28
Mental representation of symbols as revealed by vocabulary errors in two bonobos (Pan paniscus)
Lyn, H. (2007) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0086-3 · Cited by 28
Some pragmatic features of lexical ambiguity and simple riddles
Weiner, E. J., & Palma, P. D. (1993) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/0271-5309(93)90025-i · Cited by 26
COO in print advertising: Developed versus developing market comparisons
Zeugner‐Roth, K. P., & Bartsch, F. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.035 · Cited by 27
Quantum Structure in Cognition and the Foundations of Human Reasoning
Aerts, D., Sozzo, S., & Veloz, T. (2015) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-015-2717-9 · Cited by 27
Knowledge categorization affects popularity and quality of Wikipedia articles
Lerner, J., & Lomi, A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190674 · Cited by 29
Associative anaphora and its interpretation
Charolles, M. (1999) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00070-8 · Cited by 27
Modeling Human Decision-Making: An Overview of the Brussels Quantum Approach
Aerts, D., de Bianchi, M. S., Sozzo, S., & Veloz, T. (2018) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-018-9559-x · Cited by 26
Multimodal Perceptual Processing of Cues In Food Ads: Do You Smell What You See?
Koubaa, Y., & Eleuch, A. (2020) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2020-006 · Cited by 26
The Predictably Unpredictable Operant
Neuringer, A. J., & Jensen, G. (2012) · Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews · doi:10.3819/ccbr.2012.70004 · Cited by 30
Mathematics teachers learning with video: the role, for the didactician, of a heightened listening
Coles, A. (2013) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0541-3 · Cited by 26
What is a Tabby? Interpretable Model Decisions by Learning Attribute-Based Classification Criteria
Liu, H., Wang, R., Shan, S., & Chen, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2954501 · Cited by 25
Watson, R. (2019) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2019.9 · Cited by 25
Swan, R. H., Plummer, K. J., & West, R. E. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09778-1 · Cited by 27
Chan, T. H., Lee, Y. G., & Jung, H. (2021) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1454 · Cited by 23
Les langues des signes : analyseurs de la faculté de langage
Cuxac, C. (2001) · Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère · doi:10.4000/aile.536 · Cited by 24
Formation of hierarchical object concept using hierarchical latent Dirichlet allocation
Ando, Y., Nakamura, T., Araki, T., & Nagai, T. (2013) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696674 · Cited by 24
Archetypal analysis for data‐driven prototype identification
Ragozini, G., Palumbo, F., & D’Esposito, M. R. (2016) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11325 · Cited by 24
Kessler, A. M., Kennair, L. E. O., Grøntvedt, T. V., Bjørkheim, I., Drejer, I., & Bendixen, M. (2019) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-019-09675-7 · Cited by 23
Visual and Tactile Sensory Systems Share Common Features in Object Recognition
Tabrik, S., Behroozi, M., Schlaffke, L., Heba, S., Lenz, M., Lissek, S., Güntürkün, O., Dinse, H. R., & Tegenthoff, M. (2021) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0101-21.2021 · Cited by 25
Gender effects on odor-induced taste enhancement and subsequent food consumption
Koubaa, Y., & Eleuch, A. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-02-2019-3091 · Cited by 23
Vers un modèle théorique du transfert : les contraintes à respecter
Bracke, D. (2008) · Revue des sciences de l éducation · doi:10.7202/502010ar · Cited by 23
Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1307544 · Cited by 23
Evaluating Biosignatures for Life Detection
Pohorille, A., & Sokołowska, J. (2020) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2019.2151 · Cited by 22
Wertz, A. E., & Wynn, K. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.013 · Cited by 24
Predicting conjunction typicalities by component typicalities
Storms, G., de Boeck, P. A. L., Hampton, J. A., & Mechelen, I. V. (1999) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03212978 · Cited by 22
“I'll have one of each”: How separating rewards into (meaningless) categories increases motivation.
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Gino, F. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030835 · Cited by 25
Secondary predication in Russian
Strigin, A., & Demjjanow, A. (2001) · ZAS Papers in Linguistics · doi:10.21248/zaspil.25.2001.10 · Cited by 22
Bhatt, B. (2017) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-11920 · Cited by 23
Biria, R., & Bahadoran-Baghbaderani, A. (2015) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-015-9407-x · Cited by 21
Marcado diferencial de objeto y semántica verbal en español
Heredero, D. R. (2022) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110751734 · Cited by 21
Classifying SMEs for Approaching Cybersecurity Competence and Awareness
Shojaifar, A., & Järvinen, H. (2021) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1145/3465481.3469200 · Cited by 21
Are Words the Quanta of Human Language? Extending the Domain of Quantum Cognition
Aerts, D., & Beltran, L. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24010006 · Cited by 26
Considering the Feasibility of Semantic Model Design in the Built-Environment
Grzybek, H., Xu, S., Gulliver, S. R., & Fillingham, V. (2014) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings4040849 · Cited by 21
On the Conceptuality Interpretation of Quantum and Relativity Theories
Aerts, D., de Bianchi, M. S., Sozzo, S., & Veloz, T. (2018) · Figshare · Cited by 21
Themes as prototypes: Similarity judgments and categorization tasks in musical contexts
Ziv, N., & Eitan, Z. (2007) · Musicae Scientiae · doi:10.1177/1029864907011001051 · Cited by 22
Zoupidis, A., Pnevmatikos, D., Spyrtou, A., & Καριώτογλου, Π. (2016) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9375-z · Cited by 21
Monro, A. K. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009070553 · Cited by 20
Lick, D. J., Carpinella, C. M., Preciado, M. A., Spunt, R. P., & Johnson, K. L. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00476 · Cited by 20
Mind Operational Semantics and Brain Operational Architectonics: A Putative Correspondence
Benedetti, G., Marchetti, G., Fingelkurts, A. A., & Fingelkurts, A. A. (2010) · The Open Neuroimaging Journal · doi:10.2174/1874440001004020053 · Cited by 20
Carnivore Concepts: Categorization in Carnivores “Bears” Further Study
Vonk, J. M., & Leete, J. (2017) · International Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.46867/ijcp.2017.30.01.06 · Cited by 21
Reflections on the Functional Characterization of Spatial Prepositions
Langacker, R. W. (2010) · Cognition représentation langages · doi:10.4000/corela.999 · Cited by 20
Terré, N., Saury, J., & Sève, C. (2013) · Ejournal de la recherche sur l intervention en éducation physique et sport -eJRIEPS · doi:10.4000/ejrieps.2644 · Cited by 20
Alessandroni, N., & Rodríguez, C. (2020) · Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica · doi:10.1186/s41155-020-00154-9 · Cited by 20
Digital Improvisational Theatre: Party Quirks
Magerko, B. S., DeLeon, C., & Dohogne, P. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_5 · Cited by 20
Affective meaning and depression: A semantic differential analysis
Karoly, P., & Ruehlman, L. S. (1983) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173422 · Cited by 20
Modeling the meaning of words: Neural correlates of abstract and concrete noun processing
Mårtensson, F., Roll, M., Apt, P., & Horne, M. A. (2011) · Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis · doi:10.55782/ane-2011-1864 · Cited by 19
Abandoning a label doesn't make it disappear: The perseverance of labeling effects
Foroni, F., & Rothbart, M. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.002 · Cited by 25
Söukand, R., & Kalle, R. (2015) · Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.3176/tr.2015.1.02 · Cited by 19
Concept formation by robots using an infinite mixture of models
Nakamura, T., Ando, Y., Nagai, T., & Kaneko, M. (2015) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2015.7354031 · Cited by 19
What We Mean When We Say Semantic: A multidiscilpinary semantic glossaryPreprint
Reilly, J. J., Shain, C., Borghesani, V., Kuhnke, P., Vigliocco, G., Peelle, J. E., Mahon, B. Z., Buxbaum, L. J., Majid, A., Brysbaert, M., et al. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xrnb2 · Cited by 19
Source localization of event-related brain activity elicited by food and nonfood odors
Iannilli, E., Sorokowska, A., Zhigang, Z., Haehner, A., Warr, J., & Hummel, T. R. (2015) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.12.044 · Cited by 20
Gardelle, L. (2016) · Anglophonia · doi:10.4000/anglophonia.1028 · Cited by 18
Suhaimi, S. N., Kuys, B., Barron, D., Li, N., Rahman, Z. A., & Whitfield, A. (2022) · Empirical Studies of the Arts · doi:10.1177/02762374221094137 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosch, E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rosch, Eleanor
- Venue
- Readings in Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1988
- Pages
- 312-322
- OpenAlex
- W952881364
- Cited by
- 946
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 21.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cognitive and psychological constructs research
- Keywords
- categorization, classification, classification principles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
