Cited by 3DNA and Biological ComputingCryptography and Data SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Security, privacy, and trust management in DNA computing

Open access
Fernandes, Maria, Decouchant, Jérémie, Couto, Francisco M.·2023·Advances in Computers

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.adcom.2022.08.009

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genomic data such as DNA data are susceptible to inference attacks, reidentification attacks, membership attacks, and recovery attacks.

    “Fernandes et al [87] pointed out that genomic data such as DNA data are susceptible to inference attacks, reidentification attacks, membership attacks, and recovery attacks.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. M. Naveed, E. Ayday, E.W. Clayton, J. Fellay, C.A. Gunter, J.P. Hubaux, B.A. Malin, X. Wang, Privacy in the genomic Era, ACM Comput. Surv. 48 (1) (2015) 1-44.
  2. A. Bessani, J. Brandt, M. Bux, V. Cogo, L. Dimitrova, J. Dowling, A. Gholami, K. Hakimzadeh, M. Hummel, M. Ismail, E. Laure, U. Leser, J.E. Litton, R. Martinez, S. Niazi, J. Reichel, K. Zimmermann, BiobankCloud: a platform for the secure storage, sharing, and processing of large biomedical data sets, in: Proceedings of the Big-O(Q)/DMAH@VLDB 2015, 2015, pp. 86-105.
  3. M. Fernandes, J. Decouchant, F.M. Couto, P. Esteves-Verı ´ssimo, Cloud-assisted read alignment and privacy, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Practical Applications of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, 2017.
  4. A. Michalas, N. Paladi, C. Gehrmann, Security aspects of e-health systems migration to the cloud, in: Proceedings of the IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services, 2014, pp. 212-218.
  5. M. Humbert, E. Ayday, J.P. Hubaux, A. Telenti, Addressing the concerns of the lacks family: quantification of kin genomic privacy, in: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer & Communications Security, 2013, pp. 1141-1152.
  6. M. Fernandes, Reconciling data privacy with sharing in next-generation genomic workflows, (PhD thesis), University of Luxembourg 2020.
  7. R. Wang, Y.F. Li, X. Wang, H. Tang, X. Zhou, Learning your identity and disease from research papers: information leaks in genome wide association study, in: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2009, pp. 534-544.
  8. S.S. Samani, Z. Huang, E. Ayday, M. Elliot, J. Fellay, J.P. Hubaux, Z. Kutalik, Quantifying genomic privacy via inference attack with high-order SNV correlations, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, 2015, pp. 32-40.
  9. E. Ayday, M. Humbert, Inference attacks against kin genomic privacy, IEEE Secur. Priv. 15 (5) (2017) 29-37.
  10. P. Berrang, M. Humbert, Y. Zhang, I. Lehmann, R. Eils, M. Backes, Dissecting privacy risks in biomedical data, in: Proceedings of the IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2018, pp. 62-76.
  11. Z. He, J. Yu, J. Li, Q. Han, G. Luo, Y. Li, Inference attacks and controls on genotypes and phenotypes for individual genomic data, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 2020, pp. 930-937.
  12. B. Malin, L. Sweeney, Determining the identifiability of DNA database entries, in: AMIA Symposium, 2000, pp. 537-541.
  13. M.T. Goodrich, The mastermind attack on genomic data, in: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2009, pp. 204-218.
  14. Y. Wang, X. Wu, X. Shi, Infringement of Individual Privacy Via Mining Differentially Private GWAS Statistics, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data Computing and Communications, 2016, pp. 355-366.
  15. M. Backes, P. Berrang, M. Humbert, P. Manoharan, Membership privacy in MicroRNA-based studies, in: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2016, pp. 319-330.
  16. M. Fredrikson, E. Lantz, S. Jha, S. Lin, D. Page, T. Ristenpart, Privacy in pharmacogenetics: an end-to-end case study of personalized Warfarin dosing, in: Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium, 2014, pp. 17-32.
  17. I. Deznabi, M. Mobayen, N. Jafari, O. Tastan, E. Ayday, An inference attack on geno- mic data using kinship, complex correlations, and phenotype information, IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 15 (4) (2018) 1333-1343.
  18. P. Ney, L. Ceze, T. Kohno, Genotype extraction and false relative attacks: security risks to third-party genetic genealogy services beyond identity inference, in: Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, 2020.
  19. A. Machanavajjhala, D. Kifer, J. Gehrke, M. Venkitasubramaniam, L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity, ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 1 (1) (2007) 3-54.
  20. N. Li, T. Li, S. Venkatasubramanian, t-Closeness: privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, 2007, pp. 106-115.
  21. Z. Lin, M. Hewett, R.B. Altman, Using binning to maintain confidentiality of medical data, in: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, 2002, pp. 454-458.
  22. V.V. Cogo, A. Bessani, F.M. Couto, P. Verissimo, A high-throughput method to detect privacy-sensitive human genomic data, in: Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, 2015, pp. 101-110.
  23. M. Fernandes, J. Decouchant, M. V€ olp, F.M. Couto, P. Esteves-Verissimo, DNA- SeAl: sensitivity levels to optimize the performance of privacy-preserving DNA align- ment, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 24 (3) (2020) 907-915.
  24. J. Baron, K. El Defrawy, K. Minkovich, R. Ostrovsky, E. Tressler, 5pm: secure pattern matching, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Cryptography for Networks, 2012, pp. 222-240.
  25. M.J. Atallah, F. Kerschbaum, W. Du, Secure and private sequence comparisons, in: Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, 2003, pp. 39-44.
  26. M. Kantarcioglu, W. Jiang, Y. Liu, B. Malin, A cryptographic approach to securely share and query genomic sequences, IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 12 (5) (2008) 606-617.
  27. M. Namazi, J.R. Troncoso-Pastoriza, F. Perez-Gonzalez, Dynamic privacy-preserving genomic susceptibility testing, in: Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security, 2016, pp. 45-50.
  28. S. Namasudra, D. Devi, S. Choudhary, R. Patan, S. Kallam, Security, privacy, trust, and anonymity, in: S. Namasudra, G.C. Deka (Eds.), Advances of DNA Computing in Cryptography, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2018, pp. 138-150.
  29. S. Namasudra, G.C. Deka, R. Bali, Applications and future trends of DNA computing, in: S. Namasudra, G.C. Deka (Eds.), Advances of DNA Computing in Cryptography, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2018, pp. 181-192.
  30. M.M. Al Aziz, M.Z. Hasan, N. Mohammed, D. Alhadidi, Secure and efficient multi- party computation on genomic data, in: Proceedings of the International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium, 2016, pp. 278-283.
  31. D. Deuber, C. Egger, K. Fech, G. Malavolta, D. Schr€ oder, S.A.K. Thyagarajan, F. Battke, C. Durand, My genome belongs to me: controlling third party computation on genomic data, Proc. Priv. Enhanc. Technol. 2019 (1) (2019) 108-132.
  32. S. Namasudra, Fast and secure data accessing by using DNA computing for the cloud environment, IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 15 (4) (2022) 2289-2300.
  33. F. Rocha, M. Correia, Lucy in the sky without diamonds: stealing confidential data in the cloud, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops, 2011, pp. 129-134.
  34. X. Zhou, B. Peng, Y.F. Li, Y. Chen, H. Tang, X. Wang, To release or not to release: evaluating information leaks in aggregate human-genome data, in: Proceedings of the European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, 2011, pp. 607-627.
  35. M. Blanton, M.J. Atallah, K.B. Frikken, Q. Malluhi, Secure and efficient outsourcing of sequence comparisons, in: European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, 2012, pp. 505-522.
  36. Y. Chen, B. Peng, X. Wang, H. Tang, Large-scale privacy-preserving mapping of human genomic sequences on hybrid clouds, in: Proceedings of the Network & Distributed System Security Symposium, 2012.
  37. A. Bessani, M. Correia, B. Quaresma, F. Andr e, P. Sousa, DepSky: dependable and secure storage in a cloud-of-clouds, ACM Trans. Storage 9 (4) (2013) 1-33.
  38. R. Mendes, T. Oliveira, V.V. Cogo, N.F. Neves, A.N. Bessani, CHARON: a secure cloud-of-clouds system for storing and sharing big data, IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 9 (4) (2021) 1349-1361.
  39. V. Cogo, A. Bessani, Enabling the efficient, dependable cloud-based storage of human genomes, in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems Workshops, 2019.
  40. M. Schwarz, S. Weiser, D. Gruss, C. Maurice, S. Mangard, Malware guard extension: using SGX to conceal cache attacks, in: In Proceedings of the International Conference on Detection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment, 2017, pp. 3-24.
  41. J. G€ otzfried, M. Eckert, S. Schinzel, T. M€ uller, Cache attacks on Intel SGX, in: Proceedings of the European Workshop on Systems Security, 2017, pp. 1-6.
  42. C. Lambert, M. Fernandes, J. Decouchant, P. Esteves-Verı ´ssimo, MaskAl: Privacy Preserving Masked Reads Alignment using Intel SGX, in: Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), 2018.
  43. M. V€ olp, J. Decouchant, C. Lambert, M. Fernandes, P. Esteves-Verissimo, Enclave- based privacy-preserving alignment of raw genomic information: information leakage and countermeasures, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on System Software for Trusted Execution, 2017, pp. 1-6.
  44. B. Zubairu, Security risks of biomedical data processing in cloud computing environ- ment, in: Cloud Security: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Information Resources Management Association, 2019, pp. 1748-1768.
  45. T. Pascoal, J. Decouchant, A. Boutet, P. Esteves-Verissimo, DyPS: Dynamic, Private and Secure GWAS, in: Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Sciendo, 2021.
  46. K. Ayoz, E. Ayday, A.E. Cicek, Genome reconstruction attacks against genomic data-sharing beacons, arXiv preprint:2001.08852 (2020). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernandes, M., Decouchant, J., & Couto, F. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Venue
Advances in Computers
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2023
Pages
39-81
ISSN
0065-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319304751
Cited by
3
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in computers (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
DNA computing, genomic data privacy, privacy attacks, privacy-enhancing technologies, trust management, DNA data storage, genomic data security, genomic data processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review