Generative AI in medical practice: in-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges
Open accessAbstract
As advances in artificial intelligence (AI) continue to transform and revolutionize the field of medicine, understanding the potential uses of generative AI in health care becomes increasingly important. Generative AI, including models such as generative adversarial networks and large language models, shows promise in transforming medical diagnostics, research, treatment planning, and patient care. However, these data-intensive systems pose new threats to protected health information. This Viewpoint paper aims to explore various categories of generative AI in health care, including medical diagnostics, drug discovery, virtual health assistants, medical research, and clinical decision support, while identifying security and privacy threats within each phase of the life cycle of such systems (ie, data collection, model development, and implementation phases). The objectives of this study were to analyze the current state of generative AI in health care, identify opportunities and privacy and security challenges posed by integrating these technologies into existing health care infrastructure, and propose strategies for mitigating security and privacy risks. This study highlights the importance of addressing the security and privacy threats associated with generative AI in health care to ensure the safe and effective use of these systems. The findings of this study can inform the development of future generative AI systems in health care and help health care organizations better understand the potential benefits and risks associated with these systems. By examining the use cases and benefits of generative AI across diverse domains within health care, this paper contributes to theoretical discussions surrounding AI ethics, security vulnerabilities, and data privacy regulations. In addition, this study provides practical insights for stakeholders looking to adopt generative AI solutions within their organizations.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This Viewpoint paper categorizes generative AI in health care into five application areas and maps privacy and security threats across a three-phase life cycle from data collection to clinical implementation. It proposes risk assessment protocols and metrics, drawing on NIST frameworks and comparing EU and US AI governance approaches.
Key findings
- Identifies 5 categories of generative AI in health care: medical diagnostics, drug discovery, virtual health assistants, medical research, and clinical decision support, with examples including AI-Rad Companion, Insilico Medicine, Sensely/Woebot Health, Anthropic Claude, and Glass AI.
- Maps threats to a 3-phase life cycle: data collection and processing (eg, data poisoning, sensor spoofing, image tampering, reidentification), model training and building (eg, adversarial examples, AI hallucination, black-box opacity), and implementation (eg, misinformation or disinformation, model inversion, membership inference, attribute disclosure, prompt-based data extraction).
- Notes that generative AI amplifies many existing AI and machine learning threats because of its data volume, complexity, and generative nature, while some threats are not unique to generative AI.
- Recommends risk assessment protocols involving risk identification, prioritization, and controls, plus metrics such as security objectives, AI inscrutability, trustworthiness, responsibility, and harm; compares the EU AI Act’s binding risk-based rules with the US AI Bill of Rights’ nonbinding principles.
Methods
- Viewpoint/conceptual paper with no empirical sample or dataset; it reviews literature and develops a classification framework based on factors including setting, users, input data, output data, personalization level, workflow integration, validation needs, impact, risks, and human-AI collaboration.
- Maps security and privacy threats to a 3-phase generative AI life cycle adapted from prior AI security taxonomies, presenting Tables 1-3 and Figure 1.
- Recommendations draw on the National Institute of Standards and Technology Privacy Framework and AI Risk Management Framework as well as regulatory guidance discussed in the literature review.
Limitations
- The paper states that many discussed threats are not unique to generative AI and are prevalent in broader AI and machine learning systems; it also notes insufficient use cases, especially rare use cases, to establish clinical reference standards and evaluation metrics, and legal ambiguity around AI responsibility.
- The text makes evident that, as a Viewpoint paper, it lacks empirical validation, a systematic review protocol, and quantitative evaluation; its recommendations are conceptual and not tested.
- The paper acknowledges that AI inscrutability and AI trustworthiness/responsibility are not direct security or privacy measures and are long-standing broader AI issues.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
50 of 113 cited sources checked · 20 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Generative AI systems pose acute privacy and security risks because of their vast data requirements and opacity.
“However, generative AI systems pose acute privacy and security risks along with their transformative potential because of their vast data requirements and opacity [6].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] source
Contribution 24 (p. 33) links generative AI’s need for huge amounts of data to privacy concerns and potential data breaches or unauthorized access. The paper also calls for greater model transparency (Theme 1, p. 8), but the passages found do not identify opacity as a cause of the privacy and security risks claimed here. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Federated learning provides privacy to end users by only sharing gradients during training.
“It provides privacy to end users by only sharing gradients during training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says federated learning averages local model updates without accessing local data, mitigating risks to sensitive information. It does not say that only gradients are shared, and the “Privacy data leakage attack” section warns that communicated model updates can leak training-data information. Thus, the source supports the privacy benefit but not the claim that sharing only gradients provides privacy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Generative models such as large language models can power conversational agents that understand and respond to patient questions and concerns.
“Generative models such as LLMs can power conversational agents that understand and respond to patient questions and concerns [23].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] source
The Introduction says large language models underpin conversational agents that respond to prompts and queries. Section 5 gives a therapy agent responding to a patient as an example, but treats contextual understanding as a design goal rather than establishing that such agents understand and address patient questions and concerns generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The identity-obfuscated segmentation framework integrates an encoder, a binary classifier, and a segmentation analysis network to safeguard medical data privacy while preserving the integrity and efficacy of medical image segmentation.
“This framework integrates an encoder, a binary classifier, and a segmentation analysis network to form a robust approach to safeguard medical data privacy while preserving the integrity and efficacy of medical image segmentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] source
- Premisecitation
An innovative adversarial training method focused on identity-obfuscated segmentation has been proposed to address exposure of individual identities.
“An innovative adversarial training method focused on identity-obfuscated segmentation has been proposed to address this challenge [39].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] source
- Premisecitation
Ongoing challenges in medical diagnostics with generative AI include reducing false positives and negatives.
“Ongoing challenges include reducing false positives and negatives [21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] source
Section 3.3 (page not available) treats false positives and false negatives as consequential errors in medical diagnostic classifiers and discusses the trade-off between reducing them. The paper addresses medical machine learning generally, however; it does not establish this as a challenge specific to generative AI diagnostics. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Prior research found that generative AI created nonfactual or unfaithful data and outputs.
“Prior research found that generative AI created nonfactual or unfaithful data and outputs [72,77].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [72] source
In “MR Images Generated by PGGANs,” the paper reports that about 25% of its synthetic brain MR images lacked clear tumor features or contained unrealistic features and artifacts. This supports the point that some generated images were unfaithful, but it does not establish a general finding about generative AI outputs or their factual accuracy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [77] source
- Premisecitation
The increased data volume and complexity of generative AI threatens data integrity because errors and biases are prone to occur.
“Unintentionally, the increased data volume and complexity of generative AI threatens data integrity because errors and biases are prone to occur [63].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AIRMF1.0)National Institute of Standards and Technology20232023-09-20https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1 source
Appendix B (page unavailable) identifies increased training-data volume and complexity, as well as harmful bias and other data-quality issues, as AI risks. It does not specifically say that generative AI’s increased data volume and complexity cause errors and biases or threaten data integrity; its mention of generative AI risks is separate. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Deidentified medical images could be reidentified in medical image analysis because of the massive amount of image data used in training.
“One example is medical image analysis, as deidentified medical images could be reidentified in medical image analysis because of the massive amount of image data used in training [39].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] source
The Introduction says that removing patient-related image tags does not prevent identification: the raw image content can reveal a person’s identity. The paper attributes that risk to information in the images, not to the massive amount of image data used in training; that causal explanation is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Generative AI models in health care, particularly those based on deep learning, are often seen as "black boxes".
“Technically speaking, similar to all other AI models, generative AI models in health care, particularly those based on deep learning, are often seen as “black boxes” [78].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] source
Section 4, “Empirically validating the inexplicable” (page unavailable), describes deep-learning architectures in health care as presently inscrutable and discusses “opening the black box.” That supports the characterization of some deep-learning health-care models, but the passage does not address generative AI models specifically. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Noise-to-image and image-to-image GANs have been used to synthesize realistic training magnetic resonance imaging images to boost the performance of convolutional neural networks for image diagnostic AI.
“Noise-to-image and image-to-image GANs have been used to synthesize realistic training magnetic resonance imaging images to boost the performance of convolutional neural networks for image diagnostic AI [39,72].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] source
The Introduction describes an adversarial encoder that obfuscates patient identity in MRI images while preserving information for a segmentation CNN. The Related Works section discusses adversarial learning for privacy, and the robustness analysis concerns distorted encoded images. Searches for noise-to-image and image-to-image GANs, synthetic MRI training images, and improved diagnostic performance found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [72] source
- Premisecitation
Research has used synthetic data in AI for medicine and health care to address the scarcity of annotated medical data in the real world.
“By contrast, research has used synthetic data in AI for medicine and health care to address the scarcity of annotated medical data in the real world [71].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] source
- Premisecitation
The federated learning approach incorporates advanced techniques such as reinforcement learning, digital twin, and GANs to detect and prevent privacy threats in Internet of Medical Things networks.
“The approach incorporates advanced techniques such as reinforcement learning, digital twin, and GANs to detect and prevent privacy threats in IoMT networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
- Premisecitation
Model inversion attacks allow attackers to use the GAN model to infer sensitive information about the original data set.
“(3) model inversion attacks—potential for attackers to use the GAN model to infer sensitive information about the original data set.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
- Premisecitation
Improperly secured LLMs could enable bad actors to generate fake patient data or insurance claims.
“For example, improperly secured LLMs could enable bad actors to generate fake patient data or insurance claims [62].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
Section 5 (page unavailable) says actors can find ways around content filters to generate fake or harmful content. Section 3.1.2 mentions uses involving medical patient files and insurance applications, but neither passage says bad actors could generate fake patient data or insurance claims. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Ensuring that synthetic data do not leak sensitive information from the original data set is a privacy challenge.
“(2) data leakage—ensuring that the synthetic data do not leak sensitive information from the original data set;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
- Premisecitation
In model inversion attacks, attackers aim to reconstruct the training data using their ability to constantly query the model.
“In this attack, attackers aim to reconstruct the training data using their ability to constantly query the model [84];”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] source
The Summary and Section 5.2 describe model inversion attacks that use model access to infer sensitive features or reconstruct recognizable faces of people represented in the training set. The ML APIs section confirms that attackers can make prediction queries. But the paper does not establish that these attacks reconstruct the training data as a whole or recover exact training records; its face reconstructions are approximations. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Deidentifying data for LLMs is challenging.
“For example, deidentifying data for LLMs is challenging [60].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] source
- Premisecitation
There is a risk of reidentifying individuals from synthetic data if the synthetic data closely resemble real patient data.
“(1) risk of reidentification—although the data are synthetic, there might be a risk of reidentifying individuals if the synthetic data closely resemble real patient data;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
- Premisecitation
A study addresses the vulnerabilities of generative models to adversarial attacks, such as evasion attacks and membership inference attacks, highlighting a significant area of concern in health care data security.
“Finally, a study addresses the vulnerabilities of generative models to adversarial attacks (eg, evasion attacks and membership inference attacks), highlighting a significant area of concern in health care data security [51].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] source
- Premisecitation
Membership inference attacks allow an attacker to determine whether any real patients are included in the training set of the GAN model.
“(4) membership inference attacks—an attacker gains access to a set of real patient records and tries to determine whether any of the real patients are included in the training set of the GAN model [85];”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] source
The Problem Statement (p. 3) defines membership inference as determining whether a given record was in a model’s training dataset, and the discussion of training-set members (p. 3) gives a patient’s clinical record as an example. The paper describes attacks on classification models, not GANs, so it does not establish that this attack works against the GAN model in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Genomic data such as DNA data are susceptible to inference attacks, reidentification attacks, membership attacks, and recovery attacks.
“Fernandes et al [87] pointed out that genomic data such as DNA data are susceptible to inference attacks, reidentification attacks, membership attacks, and recovery attacks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] source
- Premisecitation
Input reconstruction is a mechanism to pinpoint sources of adversary training.
“Input reconstruction is another mechanism to pinpoint sources of adversary training [89].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] source
The Introduction (p. 2) describes PixelDefend as an image-purification procedure that modifies inputs to defend against adversarial attacks. It does not say that input reconstruction pinpoints sources of adversarial training; that proposed purpose is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Systems such as AI-Rad Companion leverage natural language generation models to compose radiology reports automatically, highlighting potential abnormalities and issues for clinician review.
“Systems such as AI-Rad Companion leverage natural language generation models to compose radiology reports automatically, highlighting potential abnormalities and issues for clinician review [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
- Interpretationreasoning
The collection and processing of sensitive patient data, along with model training, model building, and implementing generative AI systems, present potential security and privacy risks.
“Therefore, the collection and processing of sensitive patient data, along with tasks such as model training, model building, and implementing generative AI systems, present potential security and privacy risks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Techniques such as generative adversarial networks combined with reinforcement learning allow the intelligent generation of molecular graph representations.
“Techniques such as GANs combined with reinforcement learning allow the intelligent generation of molecular graph representations [22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
- Premisecitation
The adversarial training characteristic of generative adversarial networks allows them to investigate privacy and security issues without predetermined assumptions about opponents' capabilities.
“The unique feature of GANs in this context is their adversarial training characteristic, which allows them to investigate privacy and security issues without predetermined assumptions about opponents’ capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
- Premisenone given
Generative AI techniques can analyze data from wearables, electronic health records, and medical images to detect signs, patterns, diseases, anomalies, and risks and generate descriptive findings to improve diagnoses.
“Generative AI techniques can analyze data from wearables, EHRs, and medical images (eg, x-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography scans) to detect signs, patterns, diseases, anomalies, and risks and generate descriptive findings to improve diagnoses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
An attacker might use GANs to recover sensitive information within a distributed training system.
“an attacker might use GANs to recover sensitive information within the distributed training system”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The compressive privacy GAN defends against preimage privacy attacks in machine learning as a service by ensuring that the input data of a service module contains no sensitive information.
“This method defends against preimage privacy attacks in machine learning as a service by ensuring that the input data of a service module contains no sensitive information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] source
- Premisecitation
CorGAN uses a dual autoencoder in its generator, enabling the creation of sequential electronic health records rather than discrete entries.
“Unlike medGAN, CorGAN uses a dual autoencoder in its generator, enabling the creation of sequential EHRs rather than discrete entries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Torfi, A, 2020, arXiv Preprint posted online January 25, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In decentralized learning systems, data are trained locally by different participants without data sharing.
“In decentralized learning systems, such as distributed selective stochastic gradient descent [35] and federated learning (FL) [36], data are trained locally by different participants without data sharing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [35] source
- cites [36] McMahanBMooreERamageDHampsonSCommunication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized dataProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics2017AISTATS '17April 20-22, 2017Fort Lauderdale, FL
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Choi et al devised medGAN, an adaptation of the standard GAN framework, aimed at producing synthetic patient records that respect privacy.
“In response, Choi et al [40] devised the medical GAN (medGAN), an innovative adaptation of the standard GAN framework, aimed at producing synthetic patient records that respect privacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] ChoiEBiswalSMalinBDukeJStewartWFSunJGenerating multi-label discrete patient records using generative adversarial networksProceedings of the 2017 Machine Learning for Health Care Conference2017MLHC '17August 18-19, 2017Boston, MA120
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The compressive privacy GAN is designed to preprocess private data before the training stage in machine learning as a service scenarios.
“The compressive privacy GAN is designed to preprocess private data before the training stage in machine learning as a service scenarios [34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] source
- Interpretationreasoning
Because GANs and LLMs need large annotated medical data for training, the difficulty of acquiring such data leads to the proliferation of synthetic medical data creation.
“As discussed before, because GANs and LLMs need large annotated medical data for training, the difficulty of acquiring such data (eg, unwillingness to share because of legal compliance requirements and data paucity resulting from rare medical conditions) leads to the proliferation of synthetic medical data creation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Feeding an AI model with adversarial training examples and other poisonous data can deteriorate the performance of AI, eventually making the AI model useless and thus unavailable.
“Moreover, feeding an AI model with adversarial training examples and other poisonous data can also deteriorate the performance of AI, eventually making the AI model useless and thus unavailable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Despite differences in methods, there is a consensus on fundamental issues such as ensuring transparency, maintaining accuracy, minimizing adverse effects, and providing mechanisms for redressal.
“Despite differences in methods, there is a consensus on fundamental issues such as ensuring transparency, maintaining accuracy, minimizing adverse effects, and providing mechanisms for redressal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Generative AI amplifies many similar threats faced by all AI and machine learning systems because of its generating nature and data source volume and complexity.
“Again, it should be noted that although all AI and machine learning systems face many similar threats, as listed in Table 2, generative AI amplifies them because of its generating nature and data source volume and complexity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Even anonymized patterns in data could potentially reidentify individuals if models are improperly handled after training.
“Even anonymized patterns in data could potentially reidentify individuals if models are improperly handled after training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Feeding an AI model with carefully crafted relabeled data can create the wrong classification.
“Another example is to feed an AI model with carefully crafted relabeled data to create the wrong classification [80].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] ShafahiAHuangWNajibiMSuciuOStuderCDumitrasTAGoldsteinTPoison frogs! targeted clean-label poisoning attacks on neural networksProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems2018NIPS'18December 3-8, 2018Montréal, QC610616
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The growing use of highly synthetic data or images by generative AI, such as CorGAN, exacerbates the situation as it becomes increasingly challenging for human professionals to detect unfaithful data and outputs.
“The growing use of highly synthetic data or images by generative AI, such as CorGAN, exacerbates the situation as it becomes increasingly challenging for human professionals to detect unfaithful data and outputs [69].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] source
- Premisecitation
Image-scaling attacks, in which an adversary manipulates images so that changes are imperceptible to the human eye but recognizable by AI after downscaling, represent one form of attack.
“Image-scaling attacks, in which an adversary manipulates images so that changes are imperceptible to the human eye but recognizable by AI after downscaling, represent one such form of attack [67,68].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [67] QuiringEKleinDArpDJohnsMRieckKAdversarial preprocessing: understanding and preventing image-scaling attacks in machine learningProceedings of the 29th USENIX Security Symposium2020USS '20August 12-14, 2020Boston, MA136380
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [68] XiaoQChenYShenCChenYLiKSeeing is not believing: camouflage attacks on image scaling algorithmsProceedings of the 28th USENIX Security Symposium2019USENIXS '19August 14-16, 2019Santa Clara, CA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Adversaries can use image-scaling attacks to feed human-invisible data into an AI model to force it to make a mistake.
“For example, adversaries can use image-scaling attacks to feed human-invisible data into an AI model to force it to make a mistake [67,68].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [67] QuiringEKleinDArpDJohnsMRieckKAdversarial preprocessing: understanding and preventing image-scaling attacks in machine learningProceedings of the 29th USENIX Security Symposium2020USS '20August 12-14, 2020Boston, MA136380
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [68] XiaoQChenYShenCChenYLiKSeeing is not believing: camouflage attacks on image scaling algorithmsProceedings of the 28th USENIX Security Symposium2019USENIXS '19August 14-16, 2019Santa Clara, CA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
If deployed carelessly, generative models increase the avenues for protected health information to be leaked, stolen, or exposed in a breach.
“If deployed carelessly, generative models increase the avenues for protected health information (PHI) to be leaked, stolen, or exposed in a breach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Malicious parties also intensively explore adversarial training and use adversarial examples to attack training models to generate incorrect outcomes.
“By contrast, malicious parties also intensively explore this method and use adversarial examples to attack training models to generate incorrect outcomes [57].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
- Premisecitation
If generative AI in health care is used for diagnostics, personalized medicine, or clinical assistance, AI hallucination can be extremely dangerous and may even harm patients' lives.
“If generative AI in health care is used for diagnostics, personalized medicine, or clinical assistance, AI hallucination can be extremely dangerous and may even harm patients’ lives [83].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] source
- Interpretationreasoning
All types of generative AI using GANs and LLMs, particularly those in health care, can be attacked with adversarial examples that compromise the integrity of the training model.
“Technically, all types of generative AI using GANs and LLMs, particularly those in health care, can be attacked with adversarial examples that compromise the integrity of the training model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Almost all types of generative AI in health care face integrity threats.
“Similar to AI systems in other fields, almost all types of generative AI in health care face integrity threats.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Data poisoning can occur when data are collected from various software packages by tampering with data.
“Intentionally, data poisoning can occur when data are collected from various software packages by tampering with data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the health care context, generative AI could be used to create fake medical records or alter existing ones.
“In the health care context, generative AI in health care could be used to create fake medical records or alter existing ones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Almost all types of generative AI in health care face confidentiality threats.
“Similar to generative AI applications in other fields, almost all types of generative AI in health care face confidentiality threats.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In scenarios where AI in imaging diagnostics is targeted by such attacks, the image data can be poisoned with malicious information.
“In scenarios where AI in imaging diagnostics is targeted by such attacks, the image data can be poisoned with malicious information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Generative AI carries unique integrity risks.
“Generative AI also carries unique integrity risks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The lack of interpretability and explainability can be a significant challenge in health care, where understanding the reasoning behind a diagnosis or treatment recommendation is crucial for integrity and accountability.
“The lack of interpretability and explainability can be a significant challenge in health care, where understanding the reasoning behind a diagnosis or treatment recommendation is crucial for integrity and accountability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Errors and biases depend on the data sources for different types of generative AI in health care.
“Errors and biases also depend on the data sources for different types of generative AI in health care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Generative medical diagnosis and drug discovery AI involving genomic databases and chemical compound or protein structure databases are extremely susceptible to privacy attacks.
“Generative medical diagnosis and drug discovery AI involving genomic databases and chemical compound or protein structure databases are extremely susceptible to privacy attacks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A generative AI model may create synthetic radiology reports to diagnose nonexistent medical conditions, leading to misdiagnosis or unnecessary treatment.
“Another example is that a generative AI model may create synthetic radiology reports to diagnose nonexistent medical conditions, leading to misdiagnosis or unnecessary treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Adversaries can exploit the difference in cognitive processes between AI and humans and tamper with images during the data collection and processing phase.
“Adversaries can exploit the difference in cognitive processes between AI and humans and tamper with images during the data collection and processing phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Fabricated medical data can be fed again into LLMs, further threatening the integrity of medical information.
“Fabricated medical data can be fed again into LLMs, further threatening the integrity of medical information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Hackers could exploit vulnerabilities in systems hosting generative models to access sensitive health data used for training.
“Furthermore, hackers could also exploit vulnerabilities in systems hosting generative models to access the sensitive health data used for training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The main integrity threats in the data collection and processing phase are traditionally owing to errors and biases.
“The main integrity threats in this phase are traditionally owing to errors and biases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Generative AI's capability to create synthetic data leads to a unique integrity risk-AI hallucination.
“As mentioned before, its capability to create synthetic data leads to a unique integrity risk—AI hallucination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Generative AI encounters integrity issues, leading to phenomena such as AI hallucinations during model training and development phases.
“Generative AI also encounters integrity issues, leading to phenomena such as AI hallucinations during model training and development phases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Genomic databases are prone to privacy violations.
“Research has found that genomic databases are prone to privacy violations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Malicious actors can submit mislabeled genomic sequences and chemical compound protein structures to tamper genomic databases and chemical compound or protein structure databases, leading to fault training models and AI hallucination.
“For example, malicious actors can internationally submit mislabeled genomic sequences and chemical compound protein structures to tamper genomic databases and chemical compound or protein structure databases, leading to fault training models and AI hallucination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Skilled hackers may be able to feed prompts to models to obtain outputs of specific patient details that allow reidentification even from anonymized data.
“Skilled hackers may be able to feed prompts to models to obtain outputs of specific patient details that allow reidentification even from anonymized data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Generative AI, such as GANs, has empowered hackers to generate or change the attributes or content of medical images with high visual realism, making the detection of tampered images extremely difficult.
“Furthermore, generative AI, such as GANs, has empowered hackers to generate or change the attributes or content of medical images with high visual realism, making the detection of tampered images extremely difficult [69].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] source
- Premisecitation
AI systems interfacing with other hardware and software may face new security and privacy threats that have never existed before.
“In addition to AI-specific security and privacy threats, AI systems interfacing with other hardware and software may face new security and privacy threats that have never existed before [57].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
- Premisecitation
Health care AI systems, especially generative AI systems, are susceptible to code extraction and information extraction, leading to security and privacy breaches.
“Similar to other AI systems, health care AI systems, especially generative AI systems, are susceptible to code extraction and information extraction (eg, black-box, gray-box, and white-box attacks), leading to security and privacy breaches [57].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
- Interpretationnone given
Malicious use and exploitation may threaten the integrity of AI systems.
“Malicious use and exploitation may also threaten the integrity of AI systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Data standardization improves the quality of data collection.
“Data provenance and authentication metrics can be used to prevent collecting data from untrustworthy sources; detecting and filtering methods can be used to identify and filter poisoned data; and data standardization improves the quality of data collection [57].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 110
- May combine two claims. 61
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAdversarial training uses carefully crafted adversarial examples to attack the training model to check for the integrity and robustness of outputs.
“The method uses carefully crafted adversarial examples to attack the training model to check for the integrity and robustness of outputs [57,79].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [57] source
- cites [79] source
The Contributions section (p. 2) describes adversarial training as transforming real endoscopy images into synthetic-like images for domain adaptation. Section 4 (p. 4) says the discriminator classifies images as real or synthetic and gives feedback to the transformer. That is a different method from using crafted adversarial examples to attack a model and test the robustness of its outputs. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGhosheh et al suggest that the use of GANs to create synthetic electronic health records creates many privacy challenges, such as reidentification and membership attacks.
“Ghosheh et al [46] suggest that the use of GANs to create synthetic EHRs creates many privacy challenges (eg, reidentification and membership attacks).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn research settings, generative AI techniques can hypothesize promising new directions by creatively combining concepts.
“In research settings, these generative AI techniques can hypothesize promising new directions by creatively combining concepts [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
The analogy-based design synthesis section (p. 13) proposes using generative models to create new designs guided by analogies. The Applications section (p. 9) also describes tools that combine ideas for design ideation. Neither passage says these techniques hypothesize promising new research directions; the paper's application is engineering design. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHernandez et al discuss privacy concerns related to synthetic tabular data generation in health care.
“Hernandez et al [47] discuss privacy concerns related to synthetic tabular data generation in health care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationVarious methods and evaluation metrics are used to assess the privacy dimension of synthetic tabular data generation approaches, including identity disclosure, attribute disclosure, distance to the closest record, membership attack, maximum real-to-synthetic similarity, differential privacy cost, and GANs.
“Various methods and evaluation metrics are used to assess the privacy dimension of the synthetic tabular data generation approaches. These methods include identity disclosure, attribute disclosure, distance to the closest record, membership attack, maximum real-to-synthetic similarity, differential privacy cost, and GANs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] source
Section 6.2.3 (page unavailable) lists identity and attribute disclosure, distance to the closest record, membership attack, maximum real-to-synthetic similarity, and differential privacy cost as privacy-evaluation methods. Sections 6.2 and 6.2.3 treat GANs as approaches being evaluated, not as a privacy-evaluation method, so the final item in the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGenerative AI promises to accelerate drug discovery by inventing optimized molecular candidates.
“Generative AI also promises to accelerate drug discovery by inventing optimized molecular candidates [11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo solutions have been proposed to address privacy leakage in models: adding a regularization term in a loss function to avoid overfitting and improve robustness, and adding acceptable noise into model parameters to hinder privacy inference attacks.
“To address the problem of privacy leakage in the models, two solutions have been proposed: (1) adding a regularization term in a loss function to avoid overfitting and improve robustness; for example, this method can be applied to defend against membership inference attacks, [37] and (2) adding acceptable noise into the model parameters to hinder privacy inference attacks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationChallenges remain around privacy, information accuracy, and integration into provider workflows for virtual health assistants.
“However, challenges remain around privacy, information accuracy, and integration into provider workflows [25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExamples of GAN-based defense models include generative adversarial privacy, privacy-preserving adversarial networks, compressive adversarial privacy, and reconstructive adversarial network.
“Examples of defense models include generative adversarial privacy [30], privacy-preserving adversarial networks [31], compressive adversarial privacy [32], and reconstructive adversarial network [33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGenerative AI has applications in engaging patients through natural conversation powered by large language models.
“Generative AI also has applications in engaging patients through natural conversation powered by LLMs [2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] source
The Introduction describes ChatGPT as a generative language model capable of conversation and notes that conversational agents are available in medicine and to consumers. The Interview focuses on medical education and simulated patients; it does not describe using LLMs to engage real patients through conversation. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFederated learning is a distributed AI paradigm that offers privacy preservation in smart health care systems by allowing models to be trained without accessing the local data of participants.
“FL is a distributed AI paradigm that offers privacy preservation in smart health care systems by allowing models to be trained without accessing the local data of participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe target of federated learning in health care AI applications is to preserve the privacy of sensitive patient information communicated between hospitals and end users, particularly through Internet of Medical Things devices.
“The target of FL in health care AI applications is to preserve the privacy of sensitive patient information communicated between hospitals and end users, particularly through Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
The Introduction says FL protects privacy in smart-healthcare networks by training across IoMT networks without accessing local data, mitigating disclosure of sensitive patient information. The copy does not specifically describe FL’s target as protecting information communicated between hospitals and end users; that communication path is more specific than the cited passage supports. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep-faked patient face images could violate patient privacy and lead to the leakage or exploitation of protected health information.
“Deep-faked patient face images could violate patient privacy and lead to the leakage or exploitation of PHI [75].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] source
The Introduction (p. 1) says membership inference against GANs used with health records or medical images may reveal a patient’s disease history. The Setup (p. 7) treats face images and patient records as separate datasets. The paper supports a risk of patient-data leakage, but does not address deep-faked patient faces specifically or exploitation of protected health information. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationImplementing federated learning in Internet of Medical Things networks presents challenges, such as the need for robust federated learning for diffused health data sets, integration of federated learning with next-generation Internet of Medical Things networks, and use of blockchain for decentralized and secure data storage.
“However, implementing FL in IoMT networks presents challenges, such as the need for robust FL for diffused health data sets, the integration of FL with next-generation IoMT networks, and the use of blockchain for decentralized and secure data storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn practice, generative AI systems in health care have been found to experience integrity threats, such as generating disinformation and misinformation, and making biased decisions.
“In practice, generative AI systems in health care have been found to experiencing integrity threats, such as generating disinformation and misinformation, and making biased decisions [81].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] source
The Results (Consistency of ChatGPT Answers to Guideline Recommendations; page unavailable) report that ChatGPT’s answers agreed with clinical guidelines in 15 of 25 cases, supporting concern about inaccurate medical information. The Discussion (Principal Findings; page unavailable) warns of a danger of perpetuating biases, but does not report observed biased decisions or establish that ChatGPT generated deliberate disinformation. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAssembling genomic databases and chemical compound or protein structure databases for drug discovery is extremely challenging and could be error ridden because many genomic and protein databases lack necessary annotations, are inconsistent in formats, and may be poor in data quality.
“For example, assembling genomic databases and chemical compound or protein structure databases for drug discovery is extremely challenging and could be error ridden because many genomic and protein databases lack necessary annotations, are inconsistent in formats, and may be poor in data quality [64].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] source
Step 4 (Characterizing the data) describes incomplete or erroneous metadata, and Step 5 (Data quality) describes poorly formatted or low-quality cancer genomic data that can prevent analysis. The paper does not establish the same problems for chemical-compound or protein-structure databases, or address assembling those databases for drug discovery. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany generative AI applications in health care rely on LLMs and are trained on large amounts of internet data without being properly screened and filtered.
“Moreover, many generative AI applications in health care rely on LLMs and are trained on large amounts of internet data without being properly screened and filtered [70].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] source
The AI ethics section says many publicly deployed generative AI applications have used internet data scraped without review or training data curated with insufficient attention to bias and misinformation. But the AI technology section distinguishes non-medical LLMs from medical ones, saying that scraping internet data sight unseen may be illegal or impossible for medical LLMs. The paper therefore does not establish that many healthcare applications are trained that way. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGenerative AI is projected to build and use next-generation synthetic gene networks for various AI applications in health care, including medical diagnostics, drug discovery, and medical research.
“From a broader perspective, generative AI is projected to build and use next-generation synthetic gene networks for various AI applications in health care, including medical diagnostics, drug discovery, and medical research [73].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] source
The Abstract and Conclusions project medical applications for next-generation synthetic gene networks, and the Whole-Cell Biosensors and Response Systems section discusses potential medical sensing and imaging uses; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. The paper does not project that generative AI will build or use these networks, nor does it identify drug discovery as an AI application. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep generative models are used to create synthetic images such as skin lesions, pathology slides, colon mucosa, and chest x-rays, thereby greatly improving the reproducibility of medical data.
“For instance, deep generative models are used to create synthetic images such as skin lesions, pathology slides, colon mucosa, and chest x-rays, thereby greatly improving the reproducibility of medical data [71].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] source
The Fidelity tests section lists synthetic images of skin lesions, pathology slides, colon mucosa and chest X-rays. It says synthetic data could contribute to improving reproducibility, but does not show that generating these images has greatly improved it; the section also cautions that current generative models are not ready for off-the-shelf use. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRobustness, generalizability, and other vulnerability tests can prevent integrity and availability attacks and data breaches.
“Robustness, generalizability, and other vulnerability tests (eg, black-box and white-box tests) can further prevent integrity and availability attacks and data breaches [88].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] source
The discussion on p. 3 says data-free approaches reveal model vulnerabilities, and §4.2 (p. 10) evaluates white-box and black-box attacks. The paper also calls for robust models against adversarial attacks (p. 2), but it does not say that vulnerability tests prevent integrity or availability attacks or data breaches. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTrust is a complex concept and is built upon human users' interaction and consequent assessment of the system from cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions.
“Nevertheless, trust is a complex concept and is built upon human users’ interaction and consequent assessment of the system from cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions [91-93].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [91] source
- cites [92] source
The Introduction and Section 2.2 describe users assessing technology through human-like and system-like trusting beliefs; the discussion of social presence also connects social cues and emotion-based qualities to trust. The paper does not present cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions as a three-part account of how trust is built, as the citing sentence implies. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [93] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe current consensus is that AI trustworthiness itself is a complex measurement with multiple dimensions, such as reliability, resilience, accuracy, and completeness.
“The current consensus is that AI trustworthiness itself is a complex measurement with multiple dimensions, such as reliability, resilience, accuracy, and completeness [63,90].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [63] Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AIRMF1.0)National Institute of Standards and Technology20232023-09-20https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1 source
Section 3, “AI Risks and Trustworthiness” (page not supplied), describes trustworthiness through multiple characteristics, including reliability and resilience; the framework also says accuracy contributes to trustworthiness. The cited passages do not identify completeness as a characteristic, and “Availability of reliable metrics” says there is currently a lack of consensus on robust, verifiable ways to measure trustworthiness. Thus the multidimensional point is supported, but the claim’s list and measurement-consensus framing are not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [90] MattioliJSohierHDelabordeAAmokrane-FerkaKAwadidAChihaniZKhalfaouiSPedrozaGTowards a holistic approach for AI trustworthiness assessment based upon aids for multi-criteria aggregationProceedings of the Safe AI 2023-The AAAI’s Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety2023SafeAI '23February 13-14, 2023Washington, DC
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAI responsibility is centered on the uniqueness of AI, especially generative AI, in "human centricity, social responsibility, and sustainability".
“Moreover, this measure is centered on the uniqueness of AI, especially generative AI, in “human centricity, social responsibility, and sustainability” [63].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AIRMF1.0)National Institute of Standards and Technology20232023-09-20https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1 source
The Executive Summary (page unavailable) explicitly says that core concepts in responsible AI emphasize human centricity, social responsibility, and sustainability. It also describes AI risks as distinctive, and Appendix B mentions challenging risks related to generative AI, but neither passage singles out generative AI in connection with those three concepts. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
FindingreasoningBy systematically analyzing the diverse range of generative AI systems across health care settings using the key factors, the heterogeneous landscape of generative AI in health care can be classified into 5 overarching categories: medical diagnostics, drug discovery, virtual health assistants, medical research, and clinical decision support.
“By systematically analyzing the diverse range of generative AI systems across health care settings using the key factors discussed previously, we can classify the heterogeneous landscape of generative AI in health care into 5 overarching categories: medical diagnostics, drug discovery, virtual health assistants, medical research, and clinical decision support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The key factors used (setting, users, input data, output data, personalization level, workflow integration, validation needs, impact, risks, and human-AI collaboration) are sufficient to differentiate and classify generative AI applications in health care.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFui-Hoon et al discuss privacy issues related to generative AI, such as the potential disclosure of sensitive or private information, the widening of the digital divide, and the collection of personal and organizational data.
“They discuss several privacy issues related to generative AI, such as the potential disclosure of sensitive or private information by generative AI systems, the widening of the digital divide, and the collection of personal and organizational data by these systems, which raises concerns about security and confidentiality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningClinical decision support with generative AI could improve outcomes and reduce errors.
“This could improve outcomes and reduce errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCorGAN enhances predictive accuracy, providing more effective assistance to medical professionals.
“This approach enhances predictive accuracy, providing more effective assistance to medical professionals [43].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGenerative adversarial networks can be used to address increasing privacy concerns and strengthen privacy regulations in various applications, including medical image analysis.
“It highlights how GANs can be used to address increasing privacy concerns and strengthen privacy regulations in various applications, including medical image analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDifferential privacy is an approach that adds noise to the data to prevent the identification of individuals.
“For instance, differential privacy is an approach that adds noise to the data to prevent the identification of individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenGANs can create new and nonreal data points.
“GANs can create new and nonreal data points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn privacy and security models using generative adversarial networks, the generator can be modeled as an attacker aiming to fool a defender or as a defender resisting a powerful attacker.
“In the privacy and security models using GANs, the generator can be modeled in two ways: (1) as an attacker aiming to fool a defender (the discriminator) to simulate an attack scenario and (2) as a defender resisting a powerful attacker (the discriminator) to simulate a defense scenario.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenProtection mechanisms for decentralized learning include embedding a buried point layer in local models to detect abnormal changes and block attackers and integrating GAN with federated learning to produce realistic data without privacy leakage.
“Protection mechanisms include embedding a “buried point layer” in local models to detect abnormal changes and block attackers and integrating GAN with FL to produce realistic data without privacy leakage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe proposed framework clarifies the heterogeneous landscape of generative AI in health care and enables a trend analysis across categories.
“The proposed framework clarifies the heterogeneous landscape of generative AI in health care and enables a trend analysis across categories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The key factors used (setting, users, input data, output data, personalization level, workflow integration, validation needs, impact, risks, and human-AI collaboration) are sufficient to differentiate and classify generative AI applications in health care.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenOther advanced statistical and machine learning techniques attempt to balance data utility and privacy.
“Other advanced statistical and machine learning techniques attempt to balance data utility and privacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationmedGAN produces synthetic medical data suitable for distribution analysis, predictive modeling, and medical expert evaluations, minimizing privacy risks associated with identity and attributes.
“The outcome is synthetic medical data suitable for various uses, such as distribution analysis, predictive modeling, and medical expert evaluations, minimizing the privacy risks associated with both identity and attributes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] ChoiEBiswalSMalinBDukeJStewartWFSunJGenerating multi-label discrete patient records using generative adversarial networksProceedings of the 2017 Machine Learning for Health Care Conference2017MLHC '17August 18-19, 2017Boston, MA120
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn medical research, the widespread use of medical data, particularly in image analysis, raises significant concerns about the potential exposure of individual identities.
“In medical research, the widespread use of medical data, particularly in image analysis, raises significant concerns about the potential exposure of individual identities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn research settings, generative AI can formulate novel hypotheses by making unexpected combinations of concepts, mimicking human creativity and intuition.
“In research settings, generative AI can formulate novel hypotheses by making unexpected combinations of concepts, mimicking human creativity and intuition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGenerative AI has the potential to make a breakthrough in medical diagnostic applications, given its capability to build models using multimodal medical data.
“This subset of AI has the potential to make a breakthrough in medical diagnostic applications, given its capability to build models using multimodal medical data [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGenerative AI models can be biased, which could lead to inaccurate diagnoses and treatments.
“Another challenge of using generative AI models is that they can be biased, which could lead to inaccurate diagnoses and treatments [7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] source
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningDecentralized learning systems can protect data privacy to some extent, but it is not perfect.
“This setup can protect data privacy to some extent, but it is not perfect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [35] source
- cites [36] McMahanBMooreERamageDHampsonSCommunication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized dataProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics2017AISTATS '17April 20-22, 2017Fort Lauderdale, FL
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningA malicious server can reveal user-level privacy in distributed learning systems by training a multitask GAN with auxiliary identification.
“a malicious server can reveal user-level privacy in distributed learning systems by training a multitask GAN with auxiliary identification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningGenerative AI's unique generative capacity could accelerate scientific advancement.
“This unique generative capacity could accelerate scientific advancement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTorfi and Fox introduced CorGAN, which focuses on the correlations within medical records.
“In a parallel development, Torfi and Fox [42] introduced Correlation-Capturing Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks (CorGAN), which focuses on the correlations within medical records.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Torfi, A, 2020, arXiv Preprint posted online January 25, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWhen integrated into clinical workflows, generative AI may provide physicians with patient-specific treatment suggestions.
“When integrated into clinical workflows, it may also provide physicians with patient-specific treatment suggestions [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIntegrating generative AI into clinical workflows could provide patient-specific suggestions to assist physicians in decision-making.
“Integrating generative AI into clinical workflows could provide patient-specific suggestions to assist physicians in decision-making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe data-intensive nature and complexity of AI systems introduce acute privacy and security vulnerabilities that must be addressed to ensure safe and ethical deployment in clinical settings.
“However, the data-intensive nature and complexity of these systems introduce acute privacy and security vulnerabilities that must be addressed to ensure safe and ethical deployment in clinical settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningVirtual health assistants increase access and engagement for patients.
“This increases access and engagement for patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGAN-based models in decentralized learning systems can mimic data distribution and potentially threaten data privacy.
“The GAN-based models in these systems can mimic data distribution and potentially threaten data privacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [35] source
- cites [36] McMahanBMooreERamageDHampsonSCommunication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized dataProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics2017AISTATS '17April 20-22, 2017Fort Lauderdale, FL
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGenerative AI models can be trained on sensitive, multimodal patient data, which could be exploited by malicious actors.
“Generative AI models can be trained on sensitive, multimodal patient data, which could be exploited by malicious actors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningGenerative AI shows promise for expediting and enhancing drug discovery through inventing optimized molecular structures de novo.
“Generative AI shows promise for expediting and enhancing drug discovery through inventing optimized molecular structures de novo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFui-Hoon et al highlight regulatory and policy challenges, such as issues with copyright for AI-generated content, the lack of human control over AI behavior, data fragmentation, and information asymmetries between technology giants and regulatory authorities.
“In addition, they highlight regulatory and policy challenges, such as issues with copyright for AI-generated content, the lack of human control over AI behavior, data fragmentation, and information asymmetries between technology giants and regulatory authorities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe use of electronic health record medical records has significantly advanced medical research while simultaneously amplifying concerns regarding the privacy of this sensitive information.
“The use of EHR medical records has significantly advanced medical research while simultaneously amplifying concerns regarding the privacy of this sensitive information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth the EU AI Act and US AI Bill of Rights identify important issues such as potential bias, privacy risks, and the need for human control but tackle them differently-the EU through compliance requirements and the United States through voluntary principles.
“Both identify important issues such as potential bias, privacy risks, and the need for human control but tackle them differently—the EU through compliance requirements and the United States through voluntary principles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEthical risks around reliability, accountability, algorithmic bias, and data privacy as well as security risks related to confidentiality, integrity, and availability must be addressed through a human-centric approach.
“Ethical risks around reliability, accountability, algorithmic bias, and data privacy as well as security risks related to confidentiality, integrity, and availability must be addressed through a human-centric approach [55].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe US AI Bill of Rights, unveiled in 2023, is a nonbinding set of principles to guide AI development and use focused on algorithmic discrimination awareness, data privacy, notice and explanation of AI, and human alternatives and oversight.
“The US AI Bill of Rights, unveiled in 2023, takes a different approach as a nonbinding set of principles to guide AI development and use focused on concepts such as algorithmic discrimination awareness, data privacy, notice and explanation of AI, and human alternatives and oversight [54].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Blueprint for an AI bill of rights: making automated systems work for the American peopleThe White House2024-02-19https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough generative AI in health care holds great promise, substantial validation is required before real-world deployment.
“Although generative AI in health care holds great promise, substantial validation is required before real-world deployment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGenerative medical research AI may update knowledge and literature databases with "wrong inputs" based on wrong findings in these databases or with synthesized but hallucinated findings.
“For example, generative medical research AI may update knowledge and literature databases with “wrong inputs” based on wrong findings in these databases or with synthesized but hallucinated findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAdversarial training is a method to check for the integrity and accountability of AI models.
“Adversarial training is a method to check for the integrity and accountability of AI models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe growth in the use of synthetic data by generative AI creates new concerns about data integrity and AI hallucination.
“The growth in the use of synthetic data by generative AI also creates new concerns about data integrity and AI hallucination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGenerative virtual health assistants may put dangerous advice into knowledge databases based on erroneous data from sources or again put synthesized but hallucinated advice into such databases.
“Similarly, generative virtual health assistants may put dangerous advice into knowledge databases based on erroneous data from sources or again put synthesized but hallucinated advice into such databases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGenerative AI, such as LLMs, often requires large volumes of data to train and therefore faces many existing and new security and privacy threats.
“Nevertheless, because generative AI, such as LLMs, often requires large volumes of data (eg, large volumes of patient data) to train, it faces many existing and new security and privacy threats.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Generative AI such as LLMs often requires large volumes of patient data to train.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMalicious use of deepfakes generated by deep generative models could fabricate a patient's medical history to falsely claim insurance or lead to incorrect treatments.
“For instance, the malicious use of deepfakes generated by deep generative models could fabricate a patient’s medical history to falsely claim insurance or lead to incorrect treatments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAttribute disclosure attacks allow an attacker to infer additional attributes about a patient by learning a subset of other attributes about the same patient.
“(5) attribute disclosure attacks—an attacker can infer additional attributes about a patient by learning a subset of other attributes about the same patient [86].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Matwin, S, 2015, Advanced Research in Data Privacy
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe EU law institutes enforceable accountability around risky AI, whereas the US bill espouses aspirational AI ethics principles.
“Although the EU law institutes enforceable accountability around risky AI, the US bill espouses aspirational AI ethics principles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeidentified data may become identifiable during the data collection and processing phase, and confidential proprietary medical information may be inferred during the data collection and processing phase, leading to data and privacy breaches.
“Deidentified data may become identifiable during the data collection and processing phase, and confidential proprietary medical information, such as drug development and treatment plans, may be inferred during the data collection and processing phase [76], leading to data and privacy breaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGenerative AI is built on machine learning and AI techniques and faces similar security and privacy threats as general AI and machine learning systems.
“Generative AI is built upon machine learning and AI techniques and hence faces similar security and privacy threats, as summarized in the studies by Liu et al [56] and Hu et al [57].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Liu et al [56]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hu et al [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAdversaries can use AI technologies to automatically generate large quantities of fake data to poison data to be fed into LLMs, resulting in deteriorated performance of the models and eventually AI hallucination, misinformation or disinformation, and deepfakes.
“Adversaries can use AI technologies to automatically generate large quantities of fake data to poison data to be fed into LLMs, resulting in deteriorated performance of the models (eg, accuracy and fairness) and eventually AI hallucination, misinformation or disinformation, and deepfakes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe relationship between AI hallucination by GANs and LLMs and synthetic data use is an unknown territory in research and practice, leading to unknown vulnerabilities such as adversarial attacks.
“The relationship between AI hallucination by GANs and LLMs and synthetic data use is an unknown territory in research and practice, leading to unknown vulnerabilities such as adversarial attacks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThere is a fine line between harmful AI hallucinations or deepfakes and beneficial synthetic data use by generative AI in health care.
“These applications indicate that there is a fine line between harmful AI hallucinations or deepfakes and beneficial synthetic data use by generative AI in health care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenAdversarial training is used to check for fake or realistic features in synthetic medical images created by GANs to avoid fabrication and misleading in the model training process.
“Adversarial training is used to check for fake or realistic features in synthetic medical images created by GANs to avoid fabrication and misleading in the model training process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the data processing phase of the AI life cycle, image scaling is the main threat; recommended defense strategies include image reconstruction and data randomization.
“(2) data processing phase—image scaling is the main threat; recommended defense strategies include image reconstruction and data randomization;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAdversarial attacks can pose long-term risks, such as thwarting AI innovation in health care because of concerns about misdiagnosis, mistreatment, and patient safety.
“In general, adversarial attacks can pose long-term risks, such as thwarting AI innovation in health care because of concerns about misdiagnosis, mistreatment, and patient safety.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCorGAN synthesizes discrete and continuous health care records for model training.
“CorGAN [42] synthesizes discrete and continuous health care records for model training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Torfi, A, 2020, arXiv Preprint posted online January 25, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen being trained with adversarial examples, a diagnostic AI could make an incorrect diagnosis, a conversational virtual assistant could offer harmful advice to patients, and a clinical decision support AI could make the wrong recommendations.
“When being trained with adversarial examples, a diagnostic AI could make an incorrect diagnosis, a conversational virtual assistant could offer harmful advice to patients, and a clinical decision support AI could make the wrong recommendations, to list a few.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLiu et al surveyed the security and privacy attacks related to machine learning and developed a taxonomy.
“Liu et al [56] surveyed the security and privacy attacks related to machine learning and developed a taxonomy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe growth of synthetic medical data in health AI systems raises concerns about the vulnerabilities of such systems and the challenges of the current regulations and policies.
“In addition, the growth of synthetic medical data in health AI systems raises concerns about the vulnerabilities of such systems and the challenges of the current regulations and policies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe EU AI Act categorizes systems by risk level and introduces mandatory requirements for high-risk AI related to data and documentation, transparency, human oversight, accuracy, cybersecurity, and so on.
“It categorizes systems by risk level and introduces mandatory requirements for high-risk AI related to data and documentation, transparency, human oversight, accuracy, cybersecurity, and so on.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] EU AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligenceEuropean Parliament20232024-02-16https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningMany security and privacy threats associated with generative AI in health care are not unique to generative AI and are also prevalent in broader AI systems and machine learning models in health care and other fields.
“It should be noted that although this study primarily discusses various security and privacy threats associated with generative AI in health care (such as AI hallucination in health care), many of these threats are not unique to generative AI systems and are also prevalent in broader AI systems and machine learning models in health care and other fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCurrently, there are insufficient use cases, especially for rare use cases, to establish clinical reference standards such as clinical quality measures and evaluation metrics to assess risks and benefits.
“Currently, there are just insufficient use cases, especially for rare use cases, to establish clinical reference standards such as clinical quality measures and evaluation metrics to assess risks and benefits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEven the benevolent use of synthetic medical data faces privacy and security challenges as well as integrity challenges.
“Nevertheless, even the benevolent use of synthetic medical data faces privacy and security challenges as well as integrity challenges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe taxonomy classifies attacks into three categories: attacks targeting classifiers; attacks violating integrity, availability, and privacy; and attacks with or without specificity.
“The taxonomy classifies those attacks into three categories: (1) attacks targeting classifiers; (2) attacks violating integrity, availability, and privacy (ie, part of confidentiality); and (3) attacks with or without specificity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLiu et al summarize defense techniques in the training phase and the testing and inferring phase of the life cycle of machine learning, for example, data sanitization techniques against data poisoning attacks in the training phase and privacy-preserving techniques against privacy attacks in the testing or inferring phase.
“They also summarize the defense techniques in the training phase and the testing and inferring phase of the life cycle of machine learning, for example, data sanitization techniques against data poisoning attacks in the training phase and privacy-preserving techniques against privacy attacks in the testing or inferring phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth the EU and US highlight growing policy makers' concern over AI's societal impacts and the emergence of either compulsory or optional frameworks aimed at accountability.
“Despite this schism, both highlight growing policy makers’ concern over AI’s societal impacts and the emergence of either compulsory or optional frameworks aimed at accountability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLLMs in health care face data quality and bias issues, similar to any machine learning model, leading to erroneous medical conclusions or recommendations.
“LLMs in health care also face data quality and bias issues, similar to any machine learning model, leading to erroneous medical conclusions or recommendations [61].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese studies collectively underscore the need for a balanced approach to leveraging the benefits of AI-driven health care innovations while ensuring robust privacy and security measures.
“These studies collectively underscore the need for a balanced approach to leveraging the benefits of AI-driven health care innovations while ensuring robust privacy and security measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe principles mentioned in the US AI Bill of Rights do not specifically address generative AI, but they provide a framework for the ethical and responsible use of all AI technologies, including generative AI.
“Although the principles mentioned in the US AI Bill of Rights do not specifically address generative AI, they provide a framework for the ethical and responsible use of all AI technologies, including generative AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Blueprint for an AI bill of rights: making automated systems work for the American peopleThe White House2024-02-19https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe EU legislates binding rules that companies must follow, whereas the United States issues guidance that organizations may freely adopt.
“Ultimately, the EU legislates binding rules that companies must follow, whereas the United States issues guidance that organizations may freely adopt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe EU AI Act, passed in 2023, is the first comprehensive legal framework to specifically regulate AI systems.
“The EU AI Act, passed in 2023, is the first comprehensive legal framework to specifically regulate AI systems [53].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] EU AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligenceEuropean Parliament20232024-02-16https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the data collection phase of the AI life cycle, main security threats include databases, fake data, data breaches, and sensor attacks; defense strategies include data sanitization and data government.
“(1) data collection phase—main security threats include databases, fake data, data breaches, and sensor attacks; defense strategies include data sanitization and data government;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSensor data can be spoofed, tampered with, and thus poisoned.
“Sensor data can be spoofed [65,66], tampered with, and thus poisoned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [65] ParkYSonYShinHKimDThis ain't your dose: sensor spoofing attack on medical infusion pumpProceedings of the 10th USENIX Workshop on Offensive Technologies2016WOOT '16August 8-9, 2016Austin, TX
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [66] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor generative AI such as ChatGPT, the EU AI Act mandates transparency requirements, such as disclosing AI-generated content, designing models to prevent illegal content generation, and publishing training data summaries.
“Specifically, for generative AI such as ChatGPT, the EU AI Act mandates transparency requirements, such as disclosing AI-generated content, designing models to prevent illegal content generation, and publishing training data summaries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] EU AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligenceEuropean Parliament20232024-02-16https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHu et al present an overall framework of attacks and defense strategies based on five phases of the AI life cycle.
“Similarly, Hu et al [57] present an overall framework of attacks and defense strategies based on the following five phases of the AI life cycle:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI may cause physical harm to individual patients, damage a hospital's reputation owing to AI incidents, and even endanger society if it is weaponized (eg, being used to disrupt the global drug manufacturing and supply chain).
“For example, AI may cause physical harm to individual patients, damage a hospital’s reputation owing to AI incidents, and even endanger society if it is weaponized (eg, being used to disrupt the global drug manufacturing and supply chain).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAccuracy and reliability help to improve the integrity of an AI system.
“For instance, accuracy and reliability help to improve the integrity of an AI system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAI harm can occur to individuals, organizations, and societies.
“AI harm can occur to individuals, organizations, and societies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenAI responsibility is another key measure in AI risk assessment.
“AI responsibility is another key measure in AI risk assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGenerative AI enhances the ability to profile patients, thereby increasing the risk of privacy violations and attacks, although this capability is not unique to AI.
“Moreover, generative AI enhances the ability to profile patients, thereby increasing the risk of privacy violations and attacks, although this capability is not unique to AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe implementation contexts of generative AI matter.
“The implementation contexts of generative AI also matter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The implementation contexts of generative AI matter.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAI responsibility is a multifaceted measure depending on many other metrics and factors such as the ethical framework (eg, biases, fairness, and transparency) and legal perspective (eg, accountability and traceability).
“In other words, AI responsibility is a multifaceted measure depending on many other metrics and factors such as the ethical framework (eg, biases, fairness, and transparency) and legal perspective (eg, accountability and traceability).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAI inscrutability adds obfuscations to AI risk assessment to identify threats and vulnerabilities as well as biases owing to the lack of transparency and explainability in AI, especially in generative AI based on deep learning.
“Although AI inscrutability is not directly related to security and privacy, it adds obfuscations to AI risk assessment to identify threats and vulnerabilities as well as biases owing to the lack of transparency and explainability in AI, especially in generative AI based on deep learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationnone givenExplainability and interaction experience can be the determinants of the AI trustworthiness of a chatbot application on the patient portal, whereas reliability, accuracy, and completeness are significant factors in the AI trustworthiness of a radiology diagnosis AI for radiologists.
“application on the patient portal, whereas reliability, accuracy, and completeness are significant factors in the AI trustworthiness of a radiology diagnosis AI for radiologists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAvailability attacks such as denial of service can be used to flood conversational health AI applications to assess their resilience and availability before deployment, and integrity attacks with poisoned data can be used to test the stability of model performance and generalizability.
“For example, availability attacks such as denial of service can be used to flood conversational health AI applications to assess their resilience and availability before deployment, and integrity attacks with poisoned data can be used to test the stability of model performance and generalizability [57].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHealth care data are messy and tend to have organic biases.
“As discussed before, health care data are messy and tend to have organic biases (eg, a hospital specializes in serving a particular patient demographic, attending to gender-specific health requirements or offering dedicated care for rare diseases).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlgorithmic outputs highlighting potential issues such as biases or errors increase awareness, but this does not intrinsically amount to AI responsibility.
“Similarly, although algorithmic outputs highlighting potential issues such as biases or errors increase awareness, this does not intrinsically amount to AI responsibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAI harm is a risk measure highly related to AI responsibility and trustworthiness.
“Hence, AI harm is a risk measure highly related to AI responsibility and trustworthiness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningEstablishing genuine public trust and accountability in health care ultimately falls on the shoulders of health care administrators, innovators, and engaged communities, rather than solely on the algorithms themselves.
“Although progress indicators may serve as signals for these desired attributes, establishing genuine public trust and accountability in health care ultimately falls on the shoulders of health care administrators, innovators, and engaged communities, rather than solely on the algorithms themselves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTrue accountability involves diligent human investigation of problems that surface, enacting appropriate recourse, and continuous authority oversight.
“True accountability involves diligent human investigation of problems that surface, enacting appropriate recourse, and continuous authority oversight.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTrust emerges from human-centered institutional processes, and responsibility stems from human accountability.
“Although metrics aim to make models appear more trustworthy and responsible in reality, trust emerges from human-centered institutional processes, and responsibility stems from human accountability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenExcessive use of prompts may reveal copyright-protective data, proprietary research findings, and training models or algorithms.
“The excessive use of prompts may reveal copyright-protective data, proprietary research findings (eg, chemical compounds of a new drug), and training models or algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningTrustworthiness and responsibility are contingent on extensive institutional support structures rather than innate model capabilities.
“Thus, trustworthiness and responsibility are contingent on extensive institutional support structures rather than innate model capabilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenStrategies such as developing AI risk assessment protocols; formulating specific metrics for generative AI such as inscrutability, trustworthiness, responsibility, and harm; and ongoing model monitoring can help mitigate risks.
“Strategies such as developing AI risk assessment protocols; formulating specific metrics for generative AI such as inscrutability, trustworthiness, responsibility, and harm; and ongoing model monitoring can help mitigate risks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningVarious algorithms used in patient matching, diagnosis, and other proprietary applications often lack transparency because of their closed nature or intellectual property constraints.
“Various algorithms used in patient matching, diagnosis, and other proprietary applications often lack transparency because of their closed nature or intellectual property constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA medical chatbot that was thoroughly tested in adult populations may not be very useful in teenage populations.
“A medical chatbot that was thoroughly tested in adult populations may not be very useful in teenage populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A medical chatbot thoroughly tested in adult populations may not be very useful in teenage populations.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAI risks, including those of generative AI in health care, can emerge in a variety of ways at any phase of an AI project.
“AI risks, including those of generative AI in health care, can emerge in a variety of ways at any phase of an AI project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningGenerative AI models, especially when based on deep learning, can operate as "black boxes," making it even more difficult for practitioners to understand how conclusions or recommendations are derived.
“Generative AI models, especially when based on deep learning, can operate as “black boxes,” making it even more difficult for practitioners to understand how conclusions or recommendations are derived.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningDeveloping trustworthy AI and following responsible AI practices can reduce or avoid AI harm.
“Developing trustworthy AI and following responsible AI practices can reduce or avoid AI harm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenMany other AI metrics or factors, such as transparency, explainability, robustness, fairness, and user interactions or perceptions, can be the antecedents of AI trustworthiness.
“Many other AI metrics or factors, such as transparency, explainability, robustness, fairness, and user interactions or perceptions, can be the antecedents of AI trustworthiness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningResponsibility mainly manifests in organizational commitment to discovering issues, working with experts to properly assess AI harms, and instituting robust redress processes with stakeholder input.
“Metrics may aim for AI to appear more responsible, but responsibility mainly manifests in organizational commitment to discovering issues, working with experts to properly assess AI harms, and instituting robust redress processes with stakeholder input.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCollaborative efforts between AI developers, health care providers, policy makers, and domain experts will be critical to unlocking the benefits of generative AI while also prioritizing ethics, accountability, and safety.
“Collaborative efforts between AI developers, health care providers, policy makers, and domain experts will be critical to unlocking the benefits of generative AI while also prioritizing ethics, accountability, and safety.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe inscrutability of generative AI is a continuation of the broader issue of transparency in health care AI.
“Therefore, although the inscrutability of generative AI presents specific challenges owing to the complexity and novelty of these models, it is a continuation of the broader issue of transparency in health care AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningMany of the recommendations proposed can be applied to AI in non-health care contexts.
“Hence, many of the recommendations we propose in the subsequent section can be applied to AI in non–health care contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenClinical and nonclinical data have significantly different risks.
“The separation of clinical and nonclinical data is necessary, given the significantly different risks in these 2 types of data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Clinical and nonclinical data have significantly different risks.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIt may be challenging to humanize AI systems and transfer attributes such as trustworthiness to the algorithms themselves.
“It may be challenging to humanize AI systems and transfer attributes such as trustworthiness to the algorithms themselves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningMany AI algorithms, even those not based on generative techniques, face similar scrutiny regarding their lack of transparency.
“Therefore, many of them, even those that are not based on generative techniques, face similar scrutiny regarding their lack of transparency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAI trustworthiness helps reduce the probability and magnitude of security and privacy risks throughout the life cycle of generative AI in health care.
“Similar to AI inscrutability, although AI trustworthiness is not a direct measure of security and privacy risks, it helps reduce the probability and magnitude of such risks throughout the life cycle of generative AI in health care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn some cases, verification and validation are about not only factual accuracy but also communications and perceptions as well as cultures.
“In some cases, verification and validation are about not only factual accuracy but also communications and perceptions as well as cultures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningPublic trust fundamentally arises from the ethical data governance, risk communication, and oversight procedures instantiated by organizations.
“Indicators of model transparency, reliability, or accuracy may engender confidence among stakeholders, but public trust fundamentally arises from the ethical data governance, risk communication, and oversight procedures instantiated by organizations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationModifying training processes and models as well as training methods may help to control AI risks in the model training and building phase.
“Modifying training processes and models as well as training methods may also help to control AI risks in this phase [57].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningWithout robust governance and review processes overseeing development, data practices, and risk monitoring, claims of AI trustworthiness lack substantiation.
“Without robust governance and review processes overseeing development, data practices, and risk monitoring, claims of AI trustworthiness lack substantiation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningDeploying generative AI technologies introduces complex privacy and security challenges that must be proactively addressed to ensure safe and effective use.
“However, deploying these data-intensive technologies also introduces complex privacy and security challenges that must be proactively addressed to ensure the safe and effective use of these systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA deep learning model can carry significantly different risks than a probabilistic learning model.
“For example, a deep learning model can carry significantly different risks than a probabilistic learning model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A deep learning model can carry significantly different risks than a probabilistic learning model.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAI trustworthiness can be context dependent.
“AI trustworthiness can also be context dependent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA generative drug discovery AI may find a new molecular formula for a biochemical weapon.
“For example, a generative drug discovery AI may find a new molecular formula for a biochemical weapon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIf an IT system automatically runs behind the scenes to assist the work and decisions of human users, a trusting relationship must be established for users to interact with and rely on the system.
“The fundamental argument is that if an IT system automatically runs behind the scenes to assist the work and decisions of human users, a trusting relationship must be established for users to interact with and rely on the system [91].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningGesture and face recognition AI for medical diagnosis may need to be culturally sensitive to be useful.
“Gesture and face recognition AI for medical diagnosis may need to be culturally sensitive to be useful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Gesture and face recognition AI for medical diagnosis may need to be culturally sensitive to be useful.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIntegrating generative AI systems into health care offers immense potential to transform medical diagnostics, research, treatment planning, and patient care.
“Integrating generative AI systems into health care offers immense potential to transform medical diagnostics, research, treatment planning, and patient care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAI responsibility endorses responsible AI practices that facilitate the discovery of the negative consequences and risks of AI, including the security and privacy risks of generative AI.
“Again, although this measure does not directly evaluate security and privacy risks, it endorses responsible AI practices that facilitate the discovery of the negative consequences and risks of AI, including the security and privacy risks of generative AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe development and deployment of generative AI add complexity to the AI responsibility measure owing to its possible, unintended, but profound negative consequences and risks to human society.
“The development and deployment of generative AI add complexity to this measure owing to its possible, unintended, but profound negative consequences and risks to human society.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe challenge of inscrutability is not unique to generative AI and has been a long-standing issue in the broader field of AI, particularly in health care.
“we acknowledge that the challenge of inscrutability is not unique to generative AI and has been a long-standing issue in the broader field of AI, particularly in health care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe problem of inscrutability becomes pronounced in the context of generative AI because of its complex and often opaque decision-making processes, which can amplify the challenges already faced in health care AI.
“Nevertheless, the problem of inscrutability becomes pronounced in the context of generative AI because of its complex and often opaque decision-making processes, which can amplify the challenges already faced in health care AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a gap in the literature regarding a comprehensive examination of the unique security and privacy threats associated with generative AI systems.
“Despite the growing interest in generative AI in health care, there is a gap in the literature regarding a comprehensive examination of the unique security and privacy threats associated with generative AI systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Any compromise of medical data can have dire consequences for patients' trust and the perceived reliability of medical institutions.
“Given the sensitive nature of medical data, any compromise can have dire consequences, not just in data breaches but also in patients’ trust and the perceived reliability of medical institutions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The key factors used (setting, users, input data, output data, personalization level, workflow integration, validation needs, impact, risks, and human-AI collaboration) are sufficient to differentiate and classify generative AI applications in health care.
“The goal was to provide a framework for better understanding the diversity of generative AI across health care settings. We leverage several key factors to differentiate the applications and provide insights into this emerging field, described in the following sections.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The life cycle phases of data collection, model development, and implementation capture the relevant security and privacy threats for generative AI systems in health care.
“This study also aims to address the gap by identifying security and privacy threats and mapping them to the life cycle of various generative AI systems in health care, from data collection through model building to clinical implementation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Generative AI such as LLMs often requires large volumes of patient data to train.
“Nevertheless, because generative AI, such as LLMs, often requires large volumes of data (eg, large volumes of patient data) to train, it faces many existing and new security and privacy threats.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Health care is a heavily regulated field in terms of patient privacy and safety.
“Nevertheless, given that health care is a heavily regulated field in terms of patient privacy and safety, researchers even claim that synthetic medical data might be promising to overcome data sharing obstacles for health care AI and free developers from sensitive patient information [74].”
The paper relies on this without support.
Patients and clinicians expect factual, scientific answers or outputs with consistency from generative AI models.
“This can be a serious integrity and authenticity issue, as both patients and clinicians expect factual, scientific answers or outputs with consistency from such models.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinical and nonclinical data have significantly different risks.
“The separation of clinical and nonclinical data is necessary, given the significantly different risks in these 2 types of data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A deep learning model can carry significantly different risks than a probabilistic learning model.
“For example, a deep learning model can carry significantly different risks than a probabilistic learning model.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The implementation contexts of generative AI matter.
“The implementation contexts of generative AI also matter.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A medical chatbot thoroughly tested in adult populations may not be very useful in teenage populations.
“A medical chatbot that was thoroughly tested in adult populations may not be very useful in teenage populations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Gesture and face recognition AI for medical diagnosis may need to be culturally sensitive to be useful.
“Gesture and face recognition AI for medical diagnosis may need to be culturally sensitive to be useful.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In health care, there is a legal ambiguity related to AI responsibility.
“In health care, there is a legal ambiguity related to AI responsibility.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Hospitals are still unclear about their legal liability when facing an AI incident.
“Hospitals are still unclear about their legal liability when facing an AI incident.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ethical concerns may arise from employing AI chatbots in delicate domains pertaining to patient care, privacy, and confidentiality.
“Furthermore, ethical concerns may arise from employing AI chatbots in delicate domains pertaining to patient care, privacy, and confidentiality (52–54).”
From Digital affordances of AI chatbots in nursing education: a systematic review of learning gains and gaps in the evidence (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Medical diagnostics row refers to seven data sources but lists five
MinorThe medical diagnostics row numbers privacy breaches as applying to sources 1 through 7, but its data-source column lists only five sources.
“1-7: Privacy breaches (eg, reidentify patients)”
“Medical images (eg, x-rays, CTb scans, MRIc scans, pet scans, and microscopy images)Patient reports and EHRsd (eg, laboratory results, comorbidities, and symptoms)Clinical measurements (vital signs, tumor measurements, and fluid output)Patient metadata (demographics and family history)Expert annotations to train models”
Drug discovery row refers to a seventh data source that is not listed
MinorThe drug discovery row numbers privacy breaches as applying to sources 1 through 7, but its data-source column lists only six sources.
“6: Incorrect or inaccurate models1-7: Privacy breaches (eg, reidentify patients)”
“Genomic databases (DNA or RNA sequencing data)Chemical compound or protein structure databasesBioactivity assay data (in vivo and in vitro)Disease or treatment knowledge bases (peer-reviewed findings)Patient clinical trial dataToxicity predictions from pharmacokinetic models”
Cited works that were retracted
Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.
Cites a retracted work: 10.1155/2022/9985933
MajorThe cited work was retracted on 2023-08-02 (notice 10.1155/2023/9815652), before this paper was published (2024-03-08). Its authors could have known.
Cited work 10.1155/2022/9985933 · retracted 2023-08-02 · notice 10.1155/2023/9815652 · this paper published 2024-03-08
“Another study emphasizes the need for secure and robust machine learning techniques in health care, particularly focusing on privacy and security [50].”
Cites
1 retracted
Privacy Protection of Healthcare Data over Social Networks Using Machine Learning Algorithms
Khan, S., Saravanan, V., Gnanaprakasam, C. N., et al. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/9985933 · Cited by 32 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another study emphasizes the need for secure and robust machine learning techniques in health care, particularly focusing on privacy and security [50].”
RetractedMembership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models
Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.41 · Cited by 4,754 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…access to a set of real patient records and tries to determine whether any of the real patients are included in the training set of the GAN model [85]; and (5) attribute disclosure attacks—an attacker can infer additional attributes about a patient by learning a subset of other attributes about…”
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 · Cited by 4,584 · see citing works
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · Cited by 4,115 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Generative AI could power clinical practices in health care, from generating synthetic patient data to augmenting rare disease research to creating AI-assisted drug discovery systems [3].”
Large language models in medicine
Thirunavukarasu, A. J., Ting, D. S. J., Elangovan, K., Gutierrez, L., Tan, T. F., & Ting, D. S. W. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02448-8 · Cited by 3,944 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another challenge of using generative AI models is that they can be biased, which could lead to inaccurate diagnoses and treatments [7].”
Model Inversion Attacks that Exploit Confidence Information and Basic Countermeasures
Fredrikson, M., Jha, S., & Ristenpart, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2810103.2813677 · Cited by 2,961 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this attack, attackers aim to reconstruct the training data using their ability to constantly query the model [84]; (4) membership inference attacks—an attacker gains access to a set of real patient records and tries to determine whether any of the real patients are included in the training set…”
Privacy-preserving deep learning
Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2810103.2813687 · Cited by 2,356 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In decentralized learning systems, such as distributed selective stochastic gradient descent [35] and federated learning (FL) [36], data are trained locally by different participants without data sharing.”
Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine
Lee, P., Bubeck, S., & Petro, J. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr2214184 · Cited by 1,738 · cited 1× · see citing works
“If generative AI in health care is used for diagnostics, personalized medicine, or clinical assistance, AI hallucination can be extremely dangerous and may even harm patients’lives [83].”
Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development
Paul, D., Sanap, G., Shenoy, S., Kalyane, D., Kalia, K., & Tekade, R. K. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010 · Cited by 1,695 · see citing works
The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications
Bohr, A., & Memarzadeh, K. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818438-7.00002-2 · Cited by 1,636 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The outputs produced by the system, such as images, care planning, prescription advice, treatment options, drug molecules, text, risk scores, and education materials [17], demonstrate the wide range of generative AI capabilities in health care.”
Generative AI and ChatGPT: applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration
Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research · doi:10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814 · Cited by 1,363 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The applications and challenges of generative AI in health care, including privacy issues and AI-human collaboration, are explored by Fui-Hoon et al [48].”
Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures
Mcknight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1985347.1985353 · Cited by 1,185 · see citing works
Human-in-the-loop machine learning: a state of the art
Mosqueira-Rey, E., Hernández-Pereira, E., Alonso-Ríos, D., Bobes-Bascarán, J., & Fernández-Leal, Á. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-022-10246-w · Cited by 1,137 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Generative AI systems differ in the level of human involvement required, from fully automated to human-in-the-loop (human engagement in overseeing and interacting with the AI’s operational process) [19].”
Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
Tabassi, E. (2023) · doi:10.6028/nist.ai.100-1 · Cited by 1,136 · see citing works
Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learning
Wang, Z., Song, M., Zhang, Z., Song, Y., Wang, Q., & Qi, H. (2019) · IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications · doi:10.1109/infocom.2019.8737416 · Cited by 881 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Deidentified data may become identifiable during the data collection and processing phase, and confidential proprietary medical information, such as drug development and treatment plans, may be inferred during the data collection and processing phase [76], leading to data and privacy breaches.”
Eysenbach, G. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/46885 · Cited by 840 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Generative AI also has applications in engaging patients through natural conversation powered by LLMs [2].”
Synthetic data in machine learning for medicine and healthcare
Chen, R. J., Lu, M. Y., Chen, T. Y., Williamson, D. F. K., & Mahmood, F. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00751-8 · Cited by 728 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For instance, deep generative models are used to create synthetic images such as skin lesions, pathology slides, colon mucosa, and chest x-rays, thereby greatly improving the reproducibility of medical data [71].”
Albahri, A. S., Duhaim, A. M., Fadhel, M. A., Alnoor, A., Baqer, N. S., Alzubaidi, L., Albahri, O. S., Alamoodi, A. H., Bai, J., Salhi, A., et al. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Transforms the Future of Health Care
Noorbakhsh-Sabet, N., Zand, R., Zhang, Y., & Abedi, V. (2019) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.01.017 · Cited by 626 · cited 1× · see citing works
“From administrative automation to clinical decision support, AI holds immense potential to improve patient outcomes, lower costs, and accelerate medical discoveries [1].”
Xu, L., Sanders, L., Li, K., & Chow, J. C. L. (2021) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/27850 · Cited by 571 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, challenges remain around privacy, information accuracy, and integration into provider workflows [25].”
PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examples
Song, Y., Kim, T., Nowozin, S., Ermon, S., & Kushman, N. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.10766 · Cited by 562 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Input reconstruction is another mechanism to pinpoint sources of adversary training [89].”
Technology, Humanness, and Trust: Rethinking Trust in Technology
Marshall University, Lankton, N., McKnight, D. H., Michigan State University, Tripp, J., & Baylor University (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00411 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Harrer, S. (2023) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104512 · Cited by 480 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, many generative AI applications in health care rely on LLMs and are trained on large amounts of internet data without being properly screened and filtered [70].”
Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models
Hacker, P., Engel, A., & Mauer, M. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594067 · Cited by 466 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, improperly secured LLMs could enable bad actors to generate fake patient data or insurance claims [62].”
Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularization
Nasr, M., Shokri, R., & Houmansadr, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3243734.3243855 · Cited by 458 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…been proposed: (1) adding a regularization term in a loss function to avoid overfitting and improve robustness; for example, this method can be applied to defend against membership inference attacks, [37] and (2) adding acceptable noise into the model parameters to hinder privacy inference attacks.”
Applications of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): An Updated Review
Alqahtani, H., Kavakli, M., & Kumar, G. (2019) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-019-09388-y · Cited by 439 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Generative AI refers to techniques such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) and large language models (LLMs) that synthesize novel outputs such as images, text, and molecular structures [8].”
ChatGPT for healthcare services: An emerging stage for an innovative perspective
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., & Singh, R. P. (2023) · BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations · doi:10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100105 · Cited by 429 · cited 1× · see citing works
“When integrated into clinical workflows, it may also provide physicians with patient-specific treatment suggestions [13].”
A Survey on Security Threats and Defensive Techniques of Machine Learning: A Data Driven View
Liu, Q., Li, P., Zhao, W., Cai, W., Yu, S., & Leung, V. C. M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2805680 · Cited by 421 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Liu et al [56] surveyed the security and privacy attacks related to machine learning and developed a taxonomy.”
InfluentialGenerative AI in Medicine and Healthcare: Promises, Opportunities and Challenges
Zhang, P., & Kamel Boulos, M. N. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15090286 · Cited by 411 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Generative AI tools are tailored to different types of users in health care, from clinicians to researchers to patients [15].”
Athaluri, S. A., Manthena, S. V., Kesapragada, V. S. R. K. M., Yarlagadda, V., Dave, T., & Duddumpudi, R. T. S. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.37432 · Cited by 403 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AI hallucination is a newly-coined term describing the phenomenon wherein generative AI generates fake information that appears authentic [82].”
What Can Affect AOD–PM2.5 Association?
Kumar, N. (2010) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.0901732 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Generative Adversarial Networks: A Survey Toward Private and Secure Applications
Cai, Z., Xiong, Z., Xu, H., Wang, P., Li, W., & Pan, Y. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3459992 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Federated Learning for Privacy Preservation in Smart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Survey
Ali, M., Naeem, F., Tariq, M., & Kaddoum, G. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2022.3181823 · Cited by 366 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A study discusses the potential of FL as a privacy-preserving approach in health care AI applications [49].”
Next-generation synthetic gene networks
Lu, T. K., Khalil, A. S., & Collins, J. J. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1591 · Cited by 365 · cited 1× · see citing works
“From a broader perspective, generative AI is projected to build and use next-generation synthetic gene networks for various AI applications in health care, including medical diagnostics, drug discovery, and medical research [73].”
Walker, H. L., Ghani, S., Kuemmerli, C., Nebiker, C. A., Müller, B. P., Raptis, D. A., & Staubli, S. M. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/47479 · Cited by 363 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In practice, generative AI systems in health care have been found to experiencing integrity threats, such as generating disinformation and misinformation, and making biased decisions [81].”
GAN-Leaks: A Taxonomy of Membership Inference Attacks against Generative Models
Chen, D., Yu, N., Zhang, Y., & Fritz, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3372297.3417238 · Cited by 311 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Deep-faked patient face images could violate patient privacy and lead to the leakage or exploitation of PHI [75].”
Synthetic data augmentation for surface defect detection and classification using deep learning
Jain, S., Seth, G., Paruthi, A., Soni, U., & Kumar, G. (2022) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-020-01710-x · Cited by 302 · cited 1× · see citing works
“GANs use 2 neural networks, a generator and a discriminator, that compete against each other to become better at generating synthetic data [9].”
Deep generative molecular design reshapes drug discovery
Zeng, X., Wang, F., Luo, Y., Kang, S.-G., Tang, J., Lightstone, F. C., Fang, E. F., Cornell, W., Nussinov, R., & Cheng, F. (2022) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100794 · Cited by 295 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Generative AI also promises to accelerate drug discovery by inventing optimized molecular candidates [11].”
Ahmad, K., Maabreh, M., Ghaly, M., Khan, K., Qadir, J., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2022) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100452 · Cited by 291 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Ethical risks around reliability, accountability, algorithmic bias, and data privacy as well as security risks related to confidentiality, integrity, and availability must be addressed through a human-centric approach [55].”
Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigation
Wang, Z., Qinami, K., Karakozis, I. C., Genova, K., Nair, P., Hata, K., & Russakovsky, O. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00894 · Cited by 284 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, bias mitigation and high validation thresholds are critical before real-world adoption [28].”
Synthetic data generation for tabular health records: A systematic review
Hernandez, M., Epelde, G., Alberdi, A., Cilla, R., & Rankin, D. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.053 · Cited by 278 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Hernandez et al [47] discuss privacy concerns related to synthetic tabular data generation in health care.”
Unsupervised Reverse Domain Adaptation for Synthetic Medical Images via Adversarial Training
Mahmood, F., Chen, R., & Durr, N. J. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2842767 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Non-invasive Spoofing Attacks for Anti-lock Braking Systems
Shoukry, Y., Martin, P., Tabuada, P., & Srivastava, M. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40349-1_4 · Cited by 253 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sensor data can be spoofed [65,66], tampered with, and thus poisoned.”
Combining Noise-to-Image and Image-to-Image GANs: Brain MR Image Augmentation for Tumor Detection
Han, C., Rundo, L., Araki, R., Nagano, Y., Furukawa, Y., Mauri, G., Nakayama, H., & Hayashi, H. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2947606 · Cited by 253 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Noise-to-image and image-to-image GANs have been used to synthesize realistic training magnetic resonance imaging images to boost the performance of convolutional neural networks for image diagnostic AI [39,72].”
Artificial Intelligence Security: Threats and Countermeasures
Hu, Y., Kuang, W., Qin, Z., Li, K., Zhang, J., Gao, Y., Li, W., & Li, K. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3487890 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in public services: When and why citizens accept its usage
Gesk, T. S., & Leyer, M. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101704 · Cited by 195 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, corroboration by human researchers is crucial to prevent the blind acceptance of AI-generated findings [27].”
Generation and evaluation of privacy preserving synthetic health data
Yale, A., Dash, S., Dutta, R., Guyon, I., Pavão, A., & Bennett, K. P. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.12.136 · Cited by 179 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthering these advancements, Yale et al [41] conducted an in-depth evaluation of medGAN’s ability to protect privacy in medical records.”
Generative machine learning for de novo drug discovery: A systematic review
Martinelli, D. D. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105403 · Cited by 177 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Techniques such as GANs combined with reinforcement learning allow the intelligent generation of molecular graph representations [22].”
What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?
Brown, H., Lee, K., Mireshghallah, F., Shokri, R., & Tramèr, F. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3534642 · Cited by 165 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, deidentifying data for LLMs is challenging [60].”
Context-Aware Generative Adversarial Privacy
Huang, C., Kairouz, P., Chen, X., Sankar, L., & Rajagopal, R. (2017) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e19120656 · Cited by 156 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Examples of defense models include generative adversarial privacy [30], privacy-preserving adversarial networks [31], compressive adversarial privacy [32], and reconstructive adversarial network [33].”
The promise of large language models in health care
Arora, A., & Arora, A. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00216-7 · Cited by 153 · cited 1× · see citing works
“LLMs such as GPT-4 (OpenAI) are trained on massive text data and can generate synthetic natural language text, code, and so on [10].”
As artificial intelligence goes multimodal, medical applications multiply
Topol, E. J. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adk6139 · Cited by 132 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This subset of AI has the potential to make a breakthrough in medical diagnostic applications, given its capability to build models using multimodal medical data [5].”
Rane, N. L. (2024) · Innovations in Business and Strategic Management · doi:10.61577/ibsm.2024.100002 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
In Conversation with Artificial Intelligence: Aligning language Models with Human Values
Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I. (2023) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00606-x · Cited by 127 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Generative models such as LLMs can power conversational agents that understand and respond to patient questions and concerns [23].”
Garcia, S., & Miller, S. (2019) · American Mathematical Society eBooks · doi:10.1090/mbk/121/79 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
McCoy, L. G., Brenna, C. T. A., Chen, S. S., Vold, K., & Das, S. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.001 · Cited by 118 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Technically speaking, similar to all other AI models, generative AI models in health care, particularly those based on deep learning, are often seen as “black boxes” [78].”
Rane, N. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4603234 · Cited by 106 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Rane [44] explores the wider privacy and security implications of using generative AI models, such as ChatGPT, in health care within the context of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 transformation.”
InfluentialA Survey of Generative Adversarial Networks for Synthesizing Structured Electronic Health Records
Ghosheh, G. O., Li, J., & Zhu, T. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3636424 · Cited by 95 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Ghosheh et al [46] suggest that the use of GANs to create synthetic EHRs creates many privacy challenges (eg, reidentification and membership attacks).”
Li, X., Jiang, Y., Rodriguez-Andina, J. J., Luo, H., Yin, S., & Kaynak, O. (2021) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-021-00006-0 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Generative AI has the potential to detect signs, patterns, diseases, anomalies, and risks and assist in screening patients for various chronic diseases, making more accurate and data-driven diagnoses and improving clinical decision-making [4].”
Adversarial Attacks Against Deep Generative Models on Data: A Survey
Sun, H., Zhu, T., Zhang, Z., Jin, D., Xiong, P., & Zhou, W. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3130903 · Cited by 90 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, a study addresses the vulnerabilities of generative models to adversarial attacks (eg, evasion attacks and membership inference attacks), highlighting a significant area of concern in health care data security [51].”
Privacy-Preserving Adversarial Networks
Tripathy, A., Wang, Y., & Ishwar, P. (2019) · 2019 57th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) · doi:10.1109/allerton.2019.8919758 · Cited by 87 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Examples of defense models include generative adversarial privacy [30], privacy-preserving adversarial networks [31], compressive adversarial privacy [32], and reconstructive adversarial network [33].”
Ask, Acquire, and Attack: Data-Free UAP Generation Using Class Impressions
Mopuri, K. R., Uppala, P. K., & Babu, R. V. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01240-3_2 · Cited by 86 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Robustness, generalizability, and other vulnerability tests (eg, black-box and white-box tests) can further prevent integrity and availability attacks and data breaches [88].”
Data-Driven Design-By-Analogy: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions
Jiang, S., Hu, J., Wood, K. L., & Luo, J. (2022) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4051681 · Cited by 86 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In research settings, these generative AI techniques can hypothesize promising new directions by creatively combining concepts [12].”
Generating sequential electronic health records using dual adversarial autoencoder
Lee, D., Yu, H., Jiang, X., Rogith, D., Gudala, M., Tejani, M., Zhang, Q., & Xiong, L. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa119 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This approach enhances predictive accuracy, providing more effective assistance to medical professionals [43].”
Twelve key challenges in medical machine learning and solutions
Ellis, R. J., Sander, R. M., & Limon, A. (2022) · Intelligence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ibmed.2022.100068 · Cited by 61 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Ongoing challenges include reducing false positives and negatives [21].”
van Bussel, M. J. P., Odekerken–Schröder, G. J., Ou, C., Swart, R. R., & Jacobs, M. J. G. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08189-7 · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Companies such as Sensely and Woebot Health leverage these techniques to create virtual assistants that explain symptoms, provide health information, and offer screening triage advice through natural dialogue [24].”
Faithful AI in Medicine: A Systematic Review with Large Language Models and Beyond
Xie, Q., Schenck, E. J., Yang, H. S., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., & Wang, F. (2023) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3661764/v1 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationFaithful AI in Medicine: A Systematic Review with Large Language Models and BeyondPreprint
Xie, Q., Schenck, E. J., Yang, H. S., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., & Wang, F. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.04.18.23288752 · Cited by 57 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Prior research found that generative AI created nonfactual or unfaithful data and outputs [72,77].”
Self-citationChen, C.-S., Chang, S.-F., & Liu, C.-H. (2012) · Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2012.40.4.639 · Cited by 56 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Examples of defense models include generative adversarial privacy [30], privacy-preserving adversarial networks [31], compressive adversarial privacy [32], and reconstructive adversarial network [33].”
Chen, Y., Zahedi, F. M., Abbasi, A., & Dobolyi, D. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2020.103394 · Cited by 53 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The fundamental argument is that if an IT system automatically runs behind the scenes to assist the work and decisions of human users, a trusting relationship must be established for users to interact with and rely on the system [91].”
Self-citationCompressive Privacy Generative Adversarial Network
Tseng, B.-W., & Wu, P.-Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2020.2968188 · Cited by 48 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The compressive privacy GAN is designed to preprocess private data before the training stage in machine learning as a service scenarios [34].”
The role of Artificial intelligence in the assessment of the spine and spinal cord
Martín-Noguerol, T., Oñate Miranda, M., Amrhein, T. J., Paulano-Godino, F., Xiberta, P., Vilanova, J. C., & Luna, A. (2023) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110726 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Systems such as AI-Rad Companion leverage natural language generation models to compose radiology reports automatically, highlighting potential abnormalities and issues for clinician review [20].”
Privacy-Net: An Adversarial Approach for Identity-Obfuscated Segmentation of Medical Images
Kim, B. N., Dolz, J., Jodoin, P.-M., & Desrosiers, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3065727 · Cited by 43 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Noise-to-image and image-to-image GANs have been used to synthesize realistic training magnetic resonance imaging images to boost the performance of convolutional neural networks for image diagnostic AI [39,72].”
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
(2021) · Advanced technologies and societal change · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6265-2 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Barriers to accessing public cancer genomic data
Learned, K., Durbin, A., Currie, R., Kephart, E. T., Beale, H. C., Sanders, L. M., Pfeil, J., Goldstein, T. C., Salama, S. R., Haussler, D., et al. (2019) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0096-4 · Cited by 34 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…example, assembling genomic databases and chemical compound or protein structure databases for drug discovery is extremely challenging and could be error ridden because many genomic and protein databases lack necessary annotations, are inconsistent in formats, and may be poor in data quality [64].”
The promise of AI and technology to improve quality of life and care for older adults
Abadir, P. M., Chellappa, R., Choudhry, N., Demiris, G., Ganesan, D., Karlawish, J., Li, R. M., Moore, J. H., Walston, J. D., AITCs, D. &. A. O. T., et al. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00430-0 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such methods have been used for privacy protection, particularly the combination of differential privacy and neural networks [38].”
Summerfield, C. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192843883.001.0001 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Advanced Research in Data Privacy
Navarro‐Arribas, G., & Torra, V. (2014) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09885-2 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Medical Image Tampering Detection: A New Dataset and Baseline
Reichman, B., Jing, L., Akin, O., & Tian, Y. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68763-2_20 · Cited by 13 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…and moving it to another area), classical inpainting tampering (ie, patching a missing area with tampered image slices), deep inpainting tampering (ie, similar to classical inpainting tampering but using highly realistic image slides generated by GANs), sharpening, blurring, and resampling [69].”
InfluentialTang, X., Yin, P., Zhou, Z., et al. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12112437 · Cited by 11 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…models with newer model construction methods resistant to adversarial example attacks (eg, using deep neural networks and GAN-based networks [58,59]); (5) integration phase—AI models face AI biases, confidentiality attacks (eg, model inversion, model extraction, and various privacy…”
Security, privacy, and trust management in DNA computing
Fernandes, M., Decouchant, J., & Couto, F. M. (2023) · Advances in Computers · doi:10.1016/bs.adcom.2022.08.009 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fernandes et al [87] pointed out that genomic data such as DNA data are susceptible to inference attacks, reidentification attacks, membership attacks, and recovery attacks.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Nova, K, 2023, J Adv Anal Healthc Manag, 7, 115
- Byrne, DW, 2022, Artificial Intelligence for Improved Patient Outcomes: Principles for Moving Forward with Rigorous Science
- McMahanBMooreERamageDHampsonSCommunication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized dataProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics2017AISTATS '17April 20-22, 2017Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Torfi, A, 2020, arXiv Preprint posted online January 25, 2020
- Bale, AS, 2023, Int J Intell Syst Appl Eng, 12, 697
- Gu, S, 2014, arXiv Preprint posted online December 11, 2014
- ParkYSonYShinHKimDThis ain't your dose: sensor spoofing attack on medical infusion pumpProceedings of the 10th USENIX Workshop on Offensive Technologies2016WOOT '16August 8-9, 2016Austin, TX
- QuiringEKleinDArpDJohnsMRieckKAdversarial preprocessing: understanding and preventing image-scaling attacks in machine learningProceedings of the 29th USENIX Security Symposium2020USS '20August 12-14, 2020Boston, MA136380
- XiaoQChenYShenCChenYLiKSeeing is not believing: camouflage attacks on image scaling algorithmsProceedings of the 28th USENIX Security Symposium2019USENIXS '19August 14-16, 2019Santa Clara, CA
- ShafahiAHuangWNajibiMSuciuOStuderCDumitrasTAGoldsteinTPoison frogs! targeted clean-label poisoning attacks on neural networksProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems2018NIPS'18December 3-8, 2018Montréal, QC610616
- MattioliJSohierHDelabordeAAmokrane-FerkaKAwadidAChihaniZKhalfaouiSPedrozaGTowards a holistic approach for AI trustworthiness assessment based upon aids for multi-criteria aggregationProceedings of the Safe AI 2023-The AAAI’s Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety2023SafeAI '23February 13-14, 2023Washington, DC
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transforming Cardiovascular Care With Artificial Intelligence: From Discovery to Practice
Khera, R., Oikonomou, E. K., Nadkarni, G. N., Morley, J., Wiens, J., Butte, A. J., & Topol, E. J. (2024) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.003 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Saeidnia, H. R., Fotami, S. G. H., Lund, B. D., & Ghiasi, N. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13070381 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Freyer, O., Wiest, I. C., Kather, J. N., & Gilbert, S. (2024) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(24)00124-9 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Rabbani, S. A., El‐Tanani, M., Sharma, S., Rabbani, S. S., El‐Tanani, Y., Kumar, R. R., & Saini, M. (2025) · BioMedInformatics · doi:10.3390/biomedinformatics5030037 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Legal frameworks such as HIPAA require any AI vendor handling PHI to have formal agreements in place, and until healthcare-specific, secure AI systems become more common, this remains a critical ethical and compliance issue [112].”
AI'S IMPACT ON PERSONALIZED MEDICINE: TAILORING TREATMENTS FOR IMPROVED HEALTH OUTCOMES
Udegbe, F. C., Ebulue, O. R., Ebulue, C. C., & Ekesiobi, C. S. (2024) · Engineering Science & Technology Journal · doi:10.51594/estj.v5i4.1040 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Generative AI, IoT, and blockchain in healthcare: application, issues, and solutions
Mazhar, T., Khan, S., Shahzad, T., Khan, M. A., Saeed, M. M. A., Awotunde, J. B., & Hamam, H. (2025) · Discover Internet of Things · doi:10.1007/s43926-025-00095-8 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
University Students’ Insights of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools
Gasaymeh, A.-M. M., Beirat, M. A., & Abu Qbeita, A. A. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14101062 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Mirzaei, T., Amini, L., & Esmaeilzadeh, P. (2024) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-024-02656-3 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“Our thematic analysis not only confirms but also expands upon concerns highlighted in recent studies, particularly regarding data privacy as a critical ethical challenge in deploying generative AI and LLMs in healthcare [43].”
Self-citationMoulaei, K., Akhlaghpour, S., & Fatehi, F. (2025) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105872 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Communications of the Association for Information SystemsPreprint
Marabelli, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5250701 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Maximising the translation potential of electrochemical biosensors
Docherty, N., Macdonald, D., Gordon, A., Dobrea, A., Mani, V., Fu, Y., Pang, S., Jimenez, M., & Corrigan, D. K. (2025) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/d5cc02322j · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Pal, A., Wangmo, T., Bharadia, T., Ahmed-Richards, M., Bhanderi, M., Kachhadiya, R., Allemann, S. S., & Elger, B. S. (2025) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s527922 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“16,17 20 This leaves a concerning unaddressed gap regarding the risks, opportunities and ethical considerations when non-specialist audiences use gAI/LLMs as sources of plain language medical information.”
Wang, L., Li, J., Zhuang, B., Huang, S., Fang, M., Wang, C., Li, W., Zhang, M., & Gong, S. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/64486 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Ali, H., & Aysan, A. F. (2024) · International Journal of Ethics and Systems · doi:10.1108/ijoes-04-2024-0112 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Generative AI risks and resilience: How users adapt to hallucination and privacy challenges
Lee, C., Kim, J., Lim, J. S., & Shin, D. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.teler.2025.100221 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Opportunities and Challenges for AI-Based Support for Speech-Language Pathologists
Suh, H., Dangol, A., Meadan, H., Miller, C. A., & Kientz, J. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work · doi:10.1145/3663384.3663387 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Gupta, N., Khatri, K., Malik, Y., Lakhani, A., Kanwal, A., Aggarwal, S., & Dahuja, A. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06592-8 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“AI can utilize ML algorithms trained on large datasets to evaluate source trustworthiness using source consistency and reputation analysis, with the aim of identifying probable patterns of disinformation or the spread of incorrect information [159].”
Advancing Chinese biomedical text mining with community challenges
Zong, H., Wu, R., Cha, J., Feng, W., Wu, E., Li, J., Shao, A., Tao, L., Li, Z., Tang, B., et al. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104716 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“It is necessary to consider how to protect sensitive information while performing text mining and information processing using large language models [105,106].”
BackgroundDeep Learning-Based Brain Tumor Detection in Privacy-Preserving Smart Health Care Systems
Lata, K., Singh, P., Saini, S., & Cenkeramaddi, L. R. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3456599 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“By prioritizing security measures and adopting best practices in data protection, healthcare organizations can mitigate risks and safeguard the integrity of medical image data, thereby enhancing patient’s medical records safety [18], [19], [20].”
BackgroundFuture of Connectivity: A Comprehensive Review of Innovations and Challenges in 7G Smart Networks
Chamola, V., Peelam, M. S., Guizani, M., & Niyato, D. T. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3560035 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Farah, M. F., Ramadan, Z. B., & Nassereddine, Y. (2024) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.22097 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Singh, S., Singh, S., Kraus, S., Sharma, A., & Dhir, S. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100531 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
The Ethics of AI in Healthcare: An Updated Mapping Review
Morley, J., & Floridi, L. (2025) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-94690-5_2 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Ethical Challenges in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Palliative Care
Adegbesan, A., Akingbola, A., Ojo, O., Jessica, O. U., Alao, U. H., Shagaya, U. N., Adewole, O. A., & Abdullahi, O. (2024) · Journal of Medicine Surgery and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100158 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
A Critical Analysis of Generative AI: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Research Directions
Uddin, M., Laghari, S. U. A., Alanazi, F., Hussain, S., Mazhar, T., & Rahman, M. A. (2025) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-025-10355-z · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Navigating the Ethical Terrain of AI-Generated Text Tools: A Review
Mohamed, Y. A., Mohamed, A. H. H. M., Khanan, A., Bashir, M., Adiel, M. A. E., & Elsadig, M. A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3521945 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Jin, L., Shen, Z., Alhur, A., & Naeem, S. B. (2025) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669251340954 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Sallam, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Alshuaib, O., Alhajri, H., Alotaibi, F., Alkhurainej, D., Al-Balwah, M. Y., Barakat, M. M., & Egger, J. (2024) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-024-09725-y · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Conversational AI in Pediatric Mental Health: A Narrative Review
Mansoor, M. A., Hamide, A., & Tran, T. (2025) · Children · doi:10.3390/children12030359 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Modern LLMs fall into this category, offering unprecedented conversational flexibility but raising questions about consistency and safety [56]. using rule-based frameworks to guide the overall therapeutic structure while employing generative or retrieval-based techniques for specific conversational…”
AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics
Tiwari, A., Widodo, Krisnawati, D. I., Chen, C.-Y., & Kuo, T. (2026) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-025-02563-9 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Azenkot, T., Rivera, D. R. R., Stewart, M. D., & Patel, S. P. (2025) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk-25-473590 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Linardon, J., Liu, C., Messer, M., McClure, Z., Anderson, C., & Jarman, H. K. (2025) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.24385 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Enhancing HIPAA Compliance in AI-driven mHealth Devices Security and Privacy
Riad, A. K. I., Barek, M. A., Rahman, M. M., et al. (2024) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac61105.2024.00390 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Generative Adversarial Networks: Security, Privacy, and Ethical Considerations
Shafik, W. (2025) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76710-4_5 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Abumalloh, R. A., Nilashi, M., Ooi, K., Tan, G. W., & Chan, H. K. (2024) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2024.104128 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Navigating AI to Unpack Youth Privacy Concerns: An In-Depth Exploration and Systematic Review
Shrestha, A. K., Barthwal, A., Campbell, M., Shouli, A., Syed, S., Joshi, S., & Vassileva, J. (2024) · IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) · doi:10.1109/iemcon62851.2024.11093125 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“The need for transparent data practices is emphasized, as clear communication about how data is collected, used, and protected can help alleviate privacy concerns and build trust [9], [10].”
InfluentialZhang, X., Hu, X., Sun, Y., Li, L., Deng, S., & Chen, X. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15101398 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Despite their significant potential in various fields, the rapid proliferation of GenAI tools has raised multiple concerns related to data privacy and ethical risks (Chen & Esmaeilzadeh, 2024), academic integrity (Lo et al., 2024), and user trust (Choudhury & Shamszare, 2023).”
Digital Representation of Patients as Medical Digital Twins: Data-Centric Viewpoint
Demuth, S., Seze, J. D., Edan, G., Ziemssen, T., Simon, F., & Gourraud, P. (2025) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/53542 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Concerns are rising about the risk of linkage between a virtual patient and a real patient (ie, membership inference attacks) [48-50].”
Irish, A. L., Gazica, M. W., & Becerra, V. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00435-4 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“These applications demand not only technical proficiency but also a deep understanding of Gen AI’s limitations and ethical implications [8, 13].”
InfluentialYuan, Y., Fu, J., Leng, L., Wen, Z., Wei, X., Han, D., Hu, X., Liang, Y., Luo, Q., Zhang, X., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1672140 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Workplace security and privacy implications in the GenAI age: A survey
Diro, A. A., Kaisar, S., Saini, A., Fatima, S., Pham, H., & Erba, F. (2025) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2024.103960 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Embracing Generative Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Research and Beyond
Foote, H. P., Hong, C., Anwar, M. M., Borentain, M., Bugin, K., Dreyer, N. A., Fessel, J. P., Goyal, N., Hanger, M., Hernandez, A. F., et al. (2025) · JACC Advances · doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101593 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Liu, Y., & Du, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2465861 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Chen and Esmaeilzadeh (2024) discussed the role of GenAI in medical diagnosis, clinical decision support, etc. Hitsuwari et al. (2023) discovered that haiku generated by AI, with human intervention, received higher esthetic and creativity ratings from users.”
InfluentialThe role of personality traits in predicting educational use of generative AI in higher education
Arpacı, İ., Kuşci, İ., & Gibreel, O. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-16339-0 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Esmaeilzadeh, P. (2025) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-025-03182-6 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationEthical and practical challenges of generative AI in healthcare and proposed solutions: a survey
Tung, T., Hasnaeen, S. M. N., & Zhao, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1692517 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Any form of jeopardy to this right can result in major legal consequences, including the damaging of the faculty’s and the worker’s reputations and the potential risk of the patient’s life (3).”
InfluentialSemeraro, F. F., Schnaubelt, S., Hansen, C. M., Bignami, E. G., Piazza, O., & Monsieurs, K. G. (2024) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110250 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Currie, G. M., Hewis, J., Hawk, K. E., & ROHREN, E. M. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology · doi:10.2967/jnmt.124.268359 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Next-Generation Tools for Patient Care and Rehabilitation: A Review of Modern Innovations
Mehmood, F., Mumtaz, N., & Mehmood, A. (2025) · Actuators · doi:10.3390/act14030133 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Shanmugam, D., Agrawal, M., Movva, R., Chen, I. Y., Ghassemi, M., Jacobs, M. L., & Pierson, E. (2025) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-103123-095332 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Ethical framework for responsible foundational models in medical imaging
Jha, D., Durak, G., Das, A., Sanjotra, J., Susladkar, O., Sarkar, S., Rauniyar, A., Kumar Tomar, N., Peng, L., Li, S., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1544501 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“These AI systems’ ability to generate content that may resemble existing work raises significant questions about intellectual property rights and fair use [45, 46].”
Agentic AI and the rise of in silico team science in biomedical research
Li, B., Saini, A. K., Hernandez, J. G., & Moore, J. H. (2026) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-026-03035-1 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“The integration of agentic AI into biomedical research demands careful consideration of privacy and data security, especially when using sensitive patient data 121 .”
Bosco, C., Otenen, E., Torres, J. O., Nguyen, V. V., Chheda, D., Peng, X., Jessup, N. M., Himes, A. K., Cureton, B., Lu, Y. Y.-F., et al. (2024) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/60566 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“For example, a study by Chen and Esmaeilzadeh [32] demonstrated that generative models like generative adversarial networks could significantly improve the detection and diagnosis of diseases by creating high-quality medical images from existing data.”
Baxmann, M., Kárpáti, K., & Baráth, Z. (2025) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-025-06070-7 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Central to the capabilities of generative AI is its reliance on comprehensive databases, such as annotated clinical datasets, three-dimensional (3D) imaging libraries, and repositories of patient records [5, 6].”
Lee, J. Y., Ahn, E., Xu, A., Yang, Y., Chang, Y., Cha, H., & Ammari, T. (2024) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.13090 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Optimizing metabolic health with digital twins
Su, C., Wang, P., Foo, N., & Ho, D. (2025) · npj Aging · doi:10.1038/s41514-025-00211-6 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“However, addressing challenges related to data privacy and security, trustworthiness and explainability, and bias in GenAI is crucial to ensure its safe and effective integration into wearables and digital health technologies 65 – 67 .”
Mohammed, A. M., Mohammed, M., Oleiwi, J. K., Osman, A. F., Adam, T., Betar, B. O., Gopinath, S. C. B., & Ihmedee, F. H. (2024) · South African Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.sajce.2024.12.005 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Carchiolo, V., & Malgeri, M. (2025) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi17020076 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“[48], Chen and Esmaeilzadeh analyzed the current state of generative AI in healthcare, identifying opportunities and the privacy and security challenges posed by integrating these technologies into existing healthcare infrastructure.”
Quinn, T., & Thompson, O. K. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4405206/v1 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Value-Based Health Care
Shah, R. F., Bozic, K. J., & Jayakumar, P. (2025) · HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · doi:10.1177/15563316251340074 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Campbell, M., Barthwal, A., Joshi, S., Shouli, A., & Shrestha, A. K. (2025) · IEEE Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · doi:10.1109/ccwc62904.2025.10903925 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Research highlights that while developers acknowledge the importance of data control and user consent, their primary focus may shift toward innovation and performance [24], [25].”
Öğretmen adaylarının yapay zekaya (YZ) ilişkin metafor algıları
Eriçok, B., Karataş, F., & Yüce, E. (2024) · Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.33400/kuje.1511500 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Villena, F., Véliz, C., García-Huidobro, R., & Aguayo, S. D. (2025) · Dentistry Review · doi:10.1016/j.dentre.2025.100160 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Furthermore, privacy concerns remain regarding the protection of sensitive patient data used to train GenAI models, as well as worries related to racial or other bias in the resulting generated data [65, 66, 67].”
Regulatory sandbox expansion: Exploring the leap from fintech to medical artificial intelligence
Qiu, Y., Yao, H., Ren, P., et al. (2025) · Intelligent Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.intonc.2025.03.001 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Enhancing risk management in hospitals: leveraging artificial intelligence for improved outcomes
Guerra, R. (2024) · Italian Journal of Medicine · doi:10.4081/itjm.2024.1721 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Herzog, C., & Blank, S. (2024) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2024.2431350 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Miskeen, E., Alfaifi, J. A., Alhuian, D. M., Alghamdi, M. A. A., Alharthi, M. H., Alshahrani, N. A. M., Alosaimi, G. S., Alshomrani, R. A., Hajlaa, A., Khair, N., et al. (2025) · International Journal of General Medicine · doi:10.2147/ijgm.s490261 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Eacersall, D. C. F., Pretorius, L., Smirnov, I., Spray, E., Illingworth, S., Chugh, R., Strydom, S. C., Stratton-Maher, D., Simmons, J. S., Jennings, I., et al. (2025) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2025.8.2.9 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Das, U. (2025) · ChemistrySelect · doi:10.1002/slct.202502448 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Application of GenAI in Synthetic Data Generation in the Healthcare System
Farhadi, A., & Taheri, A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82963-5_3 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Scott, I. A., Reddy, S., Kelly, T., Miller, T., & van der Vegt, A. H. (2025) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/mja2.70057 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Jabal, M. S., Warman, P. I., Zhang, J., Gupta, K., Jain, A., Mazurowski, M. A., Wiggins, W. F., Magudia, K. A., & Calabrese, E. (2025) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.240551 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in sleep medicine: assessing the diagnostic precision of ChatGPT-4
Patel, A., & Cheung, J. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · doi:10.5664/jcsm.11732 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“28,29 Although this study employed a vignette-based approach, we envision future clinical applications of LLMs may support clinical decision-making.”
Yang, W., Lü, Y., Yeom, S., & Herbert, D. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3622002 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“GenAI models must be trained on de-identified or synthetic data to protect patient privacy while maintaining data utility [103].”
Generative AI for Threat Intelligence and Information Sharing
Sindiramutty, S. R., Prabagaran, K. R. V., Jhanjhi, N. Z., et al. (2024) · Advances in digital crime, forensics, and cyber terrorism book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8944-7.ch006 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Unpacking Youth Privacy Management in AI Systems: A Privacy Calculus Model Analysis
Shouli, A., Barthwal, A., Campbell, M., & Shrestha, A. K. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3585635 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Current research underscores the significance of transparency, dependability, and ethical issues in cultivating confidence in AI systems [16], [17].”
Piechowiak, M., Goch, A., Panas, E., Masiak, J., Mikołajewski, D., Rojek, I., & Mikołajewska, E. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14234699 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“It allows multiple edge devices or healthcare institutions to co-create a global model while storing sensitive data locally [83].”
The Evaluation of GenAI Capabilities to Implement Professional Tasks
Kouzminov, Y., & Kruchinskaia, E. V. (2024) · Foresight-Russia · doi:10.17323/2500-2597.2024.4.67.76 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Anthropomorphism, dependency, and trust in Generative Artificial Intelligence
Mazhar, B., Niu, J., Ren, Y., & Haq, I. U. (2026) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.25116.maz · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Infrastructure and Investment Needs for AI Implementation in Education
Sayari, K. T. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1017-6.ch005 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Transforming Physiology and Healthcare through Foundation Models
Godwin, R. C., Tung, A., Berkowitz, D. E., & Melvin, R. L. (2025) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00048.2024 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Lim, R. E., Kim, S., Abernathy, A. M., Shin, S., & Avance, R. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2025.2497259 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Srinivasulu, A., Agrawal, A., & Vedaiyan, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Virology · doi:10.3389/fviro.2025.1625855 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Physician Use of Large Language Models: A Quantitative Study Based on Large-Scale Query-Level Data
Qiu, L., Tang, C., Bi, X., Burtch, G., Chen, Y.-M., & Zhang, H.-P. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/76941 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Second, the conversational nature of GenAI models requires substantial effort to sequentially input a complete patient health profile [30,31].”
Self-citationYou, C., Ghosh, R., Vilaro, M. J., Venkatakrishnan, R., Venkatakrishnan, R., Maxim, A., Peng, X., Tamboli, D. N. A., & Lok, B. C. L. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1655860 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Balancing privacy and performance in healthcare: A federated learning framework for sensitive data
Tanveer, F., Iradat, F., Iqbal, W., AlSagri, H. S., Alhakbani, H. A., Ahmad, A., & Khan, F. A. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251381769 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“38 We encourage future researchers to test PPFL across these domains via pilot projects or fi eld deployments.”
Baumann, S., Stone, R., & Abdelall, E. S. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25196067 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Chen & Esmaeilzadeh [80] developed a trust framework featuring real-time data provenance and audit trails, allowing users to track how their data are collected, processed and shared to enhance users’ sense of control and transparency.”
Topaz, M., Peltonen, L. M., Michalowski, M., Pruinelli, L., Ronquillo, C. E., Zhang, Z., & Babic, A. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.70016 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Schultz, K. S., Hughes, M. L., Akram, W., & Mongiu, A. K. (2024) · Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.scrs.2024.101037 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Lightening the Load: Generative AI to Mitigate the Burden of the New Era of Obesity Medical Therapy
Stevens, E. R., Elmaleh-Sachs, A., Lofton, H. F., & Mann, D. M. (2024) · JMIR Diabetes · doi:10.2196/58680 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Krishnamoorthy, M. V. (2025) · JMIRx Med · doi:10.2196/70100 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Lim, J. S., Lee, C., Shin, D., Kim, J., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2025.2501552 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Research further emphasizes that institutional responsibility extends beyond compliance; it requires active engagement in ethical governance, continuous monitoring of AI-driven decision-making, and adaptive responses to emerging data protection risks (Chen & Esmaeilzadeh, 2024).”
Ophthalmic Image Synthesis and Analysis with Generative Adversarial Network Artificial Intelligence
Masalkhi, M., Sporn, K., Kumar, R., Ong, J., Nguyen, T. A., Waisberg, E., Zaman, N., Lee, A. G., & Tavakkoli, A. (2025) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-025-01519-1 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“These regulatory frameworks also emphasize key principles such as explainability, auditability, and data governance while responding to global calls for harmonization through initiatives like the Accelerating Clinical Trials in the EU (ACT EU) [96, 102].”
InfluentialLederman, O., Llana, A., Murray, J., Stanton, R., Chugh, R., Haywood, D., Burdett, A., Warman, G., Walker, J., & Hart, N. H. (2025) · BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s13102-025-01182-7 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Unauthorised access and misuse of such information are likely to compromise patient confidentiality and erode trust in AI-driven healthcare solutions [33].”
Lin, H.-C. K., Feng, C.-H., & Liu, Y.-L. E. (2025) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-025-09993-y · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“A well-designed interface increases user trust and reduces the cognitive load associated with interacting with medical technology (Chen & Esmaeilzadeh, 2024).”
Gazit, T., Eitan, T., Gal, L., & Gradovitch, N. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70162 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Ethical considerations for clinical adoption of ambient digital scribe technology
Anderson, T. N., Mohan, V., & Gold, J. A. (2025) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaf227 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Prediction of Lupus Classification Criteria via Generative AI Medical Record Profiling
Nair, S., Lushington, G. H., Purushothaman, M., Rubin, B., Jupe, E., & Gattam, S. (2025) · BioTech · doi:10.3390/biotech14010015 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“…adversarial networks to reassemble extracted information according to speci-fi ed formats (e.g., reports, summaries or answers to query responses) [27 In operative practice, genAI proceeds from an intelligent query (often phrased in terms of human language), to draw information (in reality, word…”
Adversarial AI in Radiology: A Hidden Threat
Dietrich, N., & Patlas, M. N. (2025) · Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal · doi:10.1177/08465371251331437 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“5 While strategies to develop more resilient models are emerging, they remain in early stages, with minimal implementation in clinical AI systems.”
Jia, F., Jia, F., Li, H., et al. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104130 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, Y., & Esmaeilzadeh, P.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Esmaeilzadeh, Pouyan
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2024-03-08
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- e53008
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10960211
- OpenAlex
- W4392599656
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 107 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 71
- FWCI
- 33.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1418511, 1418504, 1533768)
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
- Samsung
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- generative AI, health care, privacy, security threats, protected health information, medical diagnostics, drug discovery, virtual health assistants, medical research, clinical decision support, AI ethics, data privacy regulation, security vulnerabilities, AI adoption in healthcare
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Data Collection, Humans, Language, Privacy, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review