Use of Foodomics for Control of Food Processing and Assessing of Food Safety
Abstract
Food chain, food safety, and food-processing sectors face new challenges due to globalization of food chain and changes in the modern consumer preferences. In addition, gradually increasing microbial resistance, changes in climate, and human errors in food handling remain a pending barrier for the efficient global food safety management. Consequently, a need for development, validation, and implementation of rapid, sensitive, and accurate methods for assessment of food safety often termed as foodomics methods is required. Even though, the growing role of these high-throughput foodomic methods based on genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic techniques has yet to be completely acknowledged by the regulatory agencies and bodies. The sensitivity and accuracy of these methods are superior to previously used standard analytical procedures and new methods are suitable to address a number of novel requirements posed by the food production sector and global food market.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ganjewar used IoT to build a food monitoring framework to prevent food spoilage due to changes in environmental conditions during storage.
“Two years later, Ganjewar also used the IoT to build a food monitoring framework to prevent food spoilage due to changes in environmental conditions during the storage period.”
From Current Status and Future Trends in Removal, Control, and Mitigation of Algae Food Safety Risks for Human Consumption (2022) · cites this paper as [150]
Ganjewar's food monitoring framework predicts and analyses data recorded by sensors to determine factors affecting food spoilage.
“It also predicts and analyses the data recorded by sensors to determine the factors affecting food spoilage [150].”
From Current Status and Future Trends in Removal, Control, and Mitigation of Algae Food Safety Risks for Human Consumption (2022) · cites this paper as [150]
Current safety testing of seaweed foods is mainly focused on compositional studies and ingredient determination.
“In terms of seaweed safety testing techniques, the current safety testing of seaweed foods is mainly focused on compositional studies and ingredient determination [150].”
From Current Status and Future Trends in Removal, Control, and Mitigation of Algae Food Safety Risks for Human Consumption (2022) · cites this paper as [150]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 223 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Josić, D., Peršurić, Ž., Rešetar, D., Martinović, T., Saftić, L., & Kraljević Pavelić, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Rijeka (HR)
- Corresponding author
- Josić, D.
- Venue
- Advances in Food and Nutrition Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 81
- Pages
- 187-229
- ISSN
- 1043-4526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2576345878
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 223
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in food and nutrition research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
- Keywords
- foodomics, food safety assessment, food safety management, food chain, microbial resistance
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Food Handling, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Organisms, Genetically Modified, Proteomics, Food Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review