Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantifying Autophagic Structures in Mammalian Cells Using Confocal Microscopy

Lamb, C.A., Joachim, J., Tooze, S.A.·2017·Methods in Enzymology

Abstract

Autophagy relies on the sequential, hierarchical association of proteins with phagophores, and forming autophagosomes to allow completion of the process. Additionally, the trafficking of the unique transmembrane autophagy-related protein ATG9 is vital for autophagy progression. In this chapter, we discuss methods to monitor autophagosome number using confocal microscopy, by following the association of different autophagosomal markers with the phagophore and completed autophagosome. We also discuss methods to monitor the trafficking of ATG9 in mammalian cells under starvation conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.09.051

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Axe, 2008, Autophagosome formation from membrane compartments enriched in phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and dynamically connected to the endoplasmic reticulum, The Journal of Cell Biology, 182, 685, 10.1083/jcb.200803137 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Birgisdottir, 2013, The LIR motif—Crucial for selective autophagy, Journal of Cell Science, 126, 3237, 10.1242/jcs.126128 · DOI
  3. Dooley, 2014, WIPI2 links LC3 conjugation with PI3P, autophagosome formation, and pathogen clearance by recruiting Atg12-5-16L1, Molecular Cell, 55, 238, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.021 · DOI
  4. Kabeya, 2004, LC3, GABARAP and GATE16 localize to autophagosomal membrane depending on form-II formation, Journal of Cell Science, 117, 2805, 10.1242/jcs.01131 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Knævelsrud, 2013, Membrane remodeling by the PX-BAR protein SNX18 promotes autophagosome formation, The Journal of Cell Biology, 202, 331, 10.1083/jcb.201205129 · DOI
  6. Lamb, 2016, TBC1D14 regulates autophagy via the TRAPP complex and ATG9 traffic, The EMBO Journal, 35, 281, 10.15252/embj.201592695 · DOI
  7. Longatti, 2012, TBC1D14 regulates autophagosome formation via Rab11- and ULK1-positive recycling endosomes, The Journal of Cell Biology, 197, 659, 10.1083/jcb.201111079 · DOI
  8. Orsi, 2012, Dynamic and transient interactions of Atg9 with autophagosomes, but not membrane integration, are required for autophagy, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 23, 1860, 10.1091/mbc.E11-09-0746 · DOI
  9. Polson, 2010, Mammalian Atg18 (WIPI2) localizes to omegasome-anchored phagophores and positively regulates LC3 lipidation, Autophagy, 6, 506, 10.4161/auto.6.4.11863 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Puri, 2013, Diverse autophagosome membrane sources coalesce in recycling endosomes, Cell, 154, 1285, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.044 · DOI
  11. Young, 2006, Starvation and ULK1-dependent cycling of mammalian Atg9 between the TGN and endosomes, Journal of Cell Science, 119, 3888, 10.1242/jcs.03172 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lamb, C. A., Joachim, J., & Tooze, S. A.
Venue
Methods in Enzymology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2017
Pages
21-42
ISSN
0076-6879
Cited by
8
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review