Enhancing learning with hand gestures: Potential mechanisms
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is not clear which memory system is directly involved in any given linguistic task.
“While it is implicit knowledge which enables both L1 and L2 learners to use language productively [40], it is not clear which memory system is directly involved in any given linguistic task [23,24].”
From Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 121 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Cook, S. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cook, Susan Wagner
- ORCID
- Cook, Susan Wagner
- Venue
- Psychology of Learning and Motivation
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 107-133
- ISSN
- 0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900453795
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 121
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Keywords
- hand gestures, mathematics learning, word learning, learning mechanisms, memory, attention, perception, conceptual processes, children and adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
