Acoustic Communication in Birds

·1982·Elsevier eBooks

DOI 10.1016/c2009-0-03022-0

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/c2009-0-03022-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Natural language and natural selection
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081061 · Cited by 1,330
Acoustic sequences in non‐human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus
Kershenbaum, A., Blumstein, D. T., Roch, M. A., Akçay, Ç., Backus, G., Bee, M. A., Bohn, K., Cao, Y., Carter, G., Cäsar, C., et al. (2016) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12160 · Cited by 337
Taking turns: bridging the gap between human and animal communication
Pika, S., Wilkinson, R., Kendrick, K. H., & Vernes, S. C. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0598 · Cited by 215
SONG DIVERGENCE BY SENSORY DRIVE IN AMAZONIAN BIRDS: SENSORY DRIVE IN BIRDSONG EVOLUTION
Tobias, J. A., Aben, J., Brumfield, R. T., Derryberry, E. P., Halfwerk, W., Slabbekoorn, H., & Seddon, N. (2010) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01067.x · Cited by 184
Specificity and multiplicity in the recognition of individuals: implications for the evolution of social behaviour
Wiley, R. H. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00246.x · Cited by 136
Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
Derryberry, E. P., Seddon, N., Derryberry, G. E., Claramunt, S., Seeholzer, G. F., Brumfield, R. T., & Tobias, J. A. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3760 · Cited by 120
Angry birds need not apply: a perspective on the flexible form and multifunctionality of avian vocal duets
Dahlin, C. R., & Benedict, L. (2014) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/eth.12182 · Cited by 114
Tit for tat among neighboring hooded warblers
Godard, R. (1993) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00164345 · Cited by 109
Conformity Without Majority? The Case for Demarcating Social from Majority Influences
van Leeuwen, E. J. C., & Haun, D. B. M. (2014) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.08.004 · Cited by 61
Acoustic signals of animals: recording, field measurements, analysis and description
Gerhardt, H. C. (1998) · Animal Acoustic Communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-76220-8_1 · Cited by 45
Acoustic communication in crocodilians: information encoding and species specificity of juvenile calls
Vergne, A. L., Aubin, T., Martin, S., & Mathevon, N. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0533-7 · Cited by 42
A dear enemy relationship in a territorial cichlid: evidence for the threat-level hypothesis
Sogawa, S., Ota, K., & Kohda, M. (2016) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/1568539x-00003351 · Cited by 20
Acoustic cues to individuality in wild male adult African savannah elephants ( Loxodonta africana )
Wierucka, K., Henley, M. D., & Mumby, H. S. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.10736 · Cited by 15
Using acoustic indices to estimate wolf pack size
Papin, M., Aznar, M., Germain, E., Guérold, F., & Pichenot, J. (2019) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.010 · Cited by 14
Untitled work
Phillips (1998) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2361(1998)17:1

Venue: Elsevier eBooks
Publisher: Elsevier
Published: 1982
DOI: 10.1016/c2009-0-03022-0
OpenAlex: W4237255981
Cited by: 957
References: 0
FWCI: 6.36
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review